Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • ESG: THE NEW IMPERATIVE
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • COVID-19
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Transformation
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Digital Health
  • Insights
    • ACA 10 Years After
    • Best Practices
    • Special Reports
    • Innovations
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top 25 Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Supply Chain
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • Data Center
    • Data Center Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • MORE +
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Newsletters
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Safety & Quality
November 02, 2019 01:00 AM

As pressure injuries climb, debate arises over whether some are avoidable

Maria Castellucci
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Print
    Hospital bed
    Getty Images / Modern Healthcare Illustration

    While hospitals have succeeded in the last few years in reducing the incidence of most healthcare-acquired conditions tracked by the federal government there is one persistent problem: pressure injuries.

    Instead of decreasing, the most recent data from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality show they are actually increasing. The preliminary national rate of pressure injuries, previously called pressure sores or ulcers, was 23 per 1,000 discharges in 2017, which represents a 6% increase from 2014 when the national rate was 21.7. That’s compared with other conditions like adverse drug events, which saw a 26% decrease over the same time period, or central line-associated blood stream infections, which saw a 6% drop.

    “Pressure ulcers are the only (hospital-acquired condition) pointing up in the wrong direction, so while we have managed to stabilize or reduce these other conditions, pressure ulcers are still harming patients,” said William Padula, assistant professor of health economics at the University of Southern California who has done extensive research on pressure injuries.

    There are tough financial consequences for hospitals that do report these painful skin sores. Since 2008, the CMS stopped paying for care related to treating a pressure injury that develops during a hospital stay along with other conditions like some infections, determining they were “reasonably preventable based on the application of published, evidence-based guidelines.” Research shows treating a single pressure injury can cost a hospital anywhere from $500 to more than $70,000.

    But wound-care specialists claim that unlike other hospital-acquired conditions followed by the CMS, not all pressure injuries can be prevented even when all guidelines are followed. Patients admitted to the hospital for long stays are much sicker than a decade ago because of longer life-expectancies. Most pressure injuries—painful lesions on the skin that develop due to pressure from lying in bed or being attached to medical devices—occur among patients in intensive-care units who are elderly, frail, have comorbidities and are experiencing organ failure. The severity of their conditions makes pressure injuries impossible to prevent even when the nursing staff does its due diligence, wound-care nurses argue. Given the challenges, they question the fairness of the regulation as it stands.

    “If we had an incentive that we wouldn’t be financially penalized for unavoidable pressure injuries, across the country everyone would do better. Everyone’s game would step up,” said Sue Creehan, the former program manager of the inpatient wound-care team at the Virginia Commonwealth University Health System. “We get dinged for things that we can’t prevent, and it’s discouraging from a nurse’s point of view.”

    This question of how to determine when a pressure injury is preventable or not will be addressed at a conference held in February by the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, which creates guidelines for the prevention and treatment of pressure injuries used widely across settings. The panel is coming out with new guidelines in mid-November. Janet Cuddigan, president of the panel, said she couldn’t offer any details about the new guidelines. They were last updated in 2014.

    The science to determine if a pressure injury is avoidable is still in its infancy. “We are trying to get a better handle on which ones are avoidable and unavoidable,” Cuddigan said.

    The CMS is unlikely to change its policy until there is better evidence supporting the notion that some injuries are unavoidable, Padula said in an email. He added that there aren’t any clinical studies yet on this subject and most of the literature is “commentary and qualitative work rather than data driven, grade-A trial evidence.”

    The CMS did not respond for comment.

    Even as some in the industry question the fairness of the CMS regulation, it did wake hospitals up to the problem of pressure injuries, which up until then was largely being ignored, Creehan said.

    Pressure injury facts

    Number of patients affected: 2.5 million annually

    Cost: $9.1 billion to $11.6 billion per year

    Lawsuits: More than 17,000 lawsuits are related to pressure ulcers annually

    Death: About 60,000 patients die as a direct result of a pressure ulcer each year

    Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality

    Before the regulation “taking care of patients with pressure injuries was taking care of them after the injury had already occurred,” she said. “It was after that move by the CMS that hospitals got serious about developing pressure injury prevention programs.”

    Preventing pressure injuries is incredibly resource-intensive. Every patient must be given a comprehensive skin assessment regularly to determine if they are at risk of developing a pressure injury throughout their stay. Even if they aren’t at risk initially, the assessments must continue because the sores can develop at any point. For patients who are at risk, a host of interventions are recommended such as rotating the patient in their bed or a chair, applying dressings to bony areas of the body and changing their meals to enhance nutrition.

    Some organizations, like Johns Hopkins Hospital, have invested in expensive pressure-reducing mattresses. “Everything about (preventing pressure injuries) is expensive,” said Amanda Owen, a wound nurse specialist at Johns Hopkins Hospital.

    Training staff is another key component. At the University of Chicago Medical Center, since 2014 the focus has been educating nurses on appropriately identifying pressure injuries. Sometimes what looks on the surface like a pressure injury is actually another kind of skin lesion, said Susan Solmos, manager of nursing clinical services at the hospital.

    The training is part of orientation and all nurses are re-trained each year. Additionally, each unit has at least two nurses, called champions, who ensure pressure injury prevention stays top of mind. The University of Chicago’s pressure injury rate has declined by 94% since 2014.

    Despite the high cost of treating injuries, Padula questioned how much most hospitals are actually focusing on prevention, which takes more upfront planning.

    “Hospitals have limited financial bandwidth,” he said. “They say to themselves, ‘We spend $1 million on pressure ulcers every year.’ But they only have to spend the $1 million once they happen … If they need half a million dollars in new prevention technology and labor to support it, then they would have to budget for it from the beginning of the year.”

    But having an effective prevention program is one of the most important elements in figuring out if an injury was avoidable, Solmos said. “High-performing organizations that are able to demonstrate that practices were implemented and a pressure injury still occurred, that would be unavoidable.”

    Executive buy-in is key to effectively prevent pressure injuries, Creehan added. She forged relationships back in 2006 with the C-suite at VCU Health to get the resources to begin a prevention program.

    “You need CEO support,” she said. “A group of nurses aren’t able to really orchestrate organizationwide culture change. You need the help of senior leadership to set the expectations, monitor the data and allocate resources. I can’t stress that enough.”

    Federal regulations also do little to provide an incentive to focus on prevention, Padula argued, saying the CMS “shot themselves in the foot” with the PSI-90 measure, which is used in the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program.

    PSI-90 is a composite measure that includes pressure injuries and nine other measures. Under the program, the score a hospital gets on PSI-90 is evenly weighted along with the scores it gets for five infection measures to determine if they get a penalty. Those who score greater than the 75th percentile compared with their peers are hit with a 1% penalty on their Medicare payments.

    Padula said the composite approach of the PSI-90 measure encourages hospitals to focus less on pressure injuries because it’s just one of many events that are part of the measure and therefore doesn’t have as much influence. “(It) led to hospitals prioritizing the things they could do well at low financial investment,” he said.

    While the PSI-90 measure didn’t affect VCU Health’s work on pressure injuries, Creehan said composite measures do make it challenging for hospitals to track their improvement.

    Padula said the CMS should consider weighing pressure injuries individually in the program so hospitals pay attention to it more. “If you don’t treat each (infection or injury) as important, it gives hospitals the opportunity to game the system,” he said.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    Nursing Home covid
    AHCA sounds alarm on nursing home staffing crisis
    Collage of images, medication pills, elderly man in hospital, bacteria, and triangle caution symbol
    High adverse event rate paints ‘serious’ picture of inpatient harm
    Most Popular
    1
    More healthcare organizations at risk of credit default, Moody's says
    2
    Centene fills out senior executive team with new president, COO
    3
    SCAN, CareOregon plan to merge into the HealthRight Group
    4
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan unveils big push that lets physicians take on risk, reap rewards
    5
    Bright Health weighs reverse stock split as delisting looms
    Sponsored Content
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • COVID-19
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Digital Health
    • Insights
      • ACA 10 Years After
      • Best Practices
      • Special Reports
      • Innovations
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top 25 Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Supply Chain
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Data Center
      • Data Center Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • MORE +
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Newsletters
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing