Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • ESG: THE IMPLEMENTATION IMPERATIVE
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Digital Health
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Transformation
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Unwell in America
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top 25 Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • Data Center
    • Data Center Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Newsletters
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Safety & Quality
October 01, 2019 03:49 PM

CMS readmissions penalty adjustment reducing the hit for high dual-eligible hospitals

Maria Castellucci
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    Hospitals that treat large populations of patients insured by both Medicare and Medicaid appear to be benefiting from the changes made to the CMS' Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program with lower penalties, according to new data.

    In the recent release of fiscal 2020 penalties for the program, the CMS for the second time risk-adjusted hospitals into five peer groups by proportion of inpatient stays where the patient was dually eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid. Hospitals in peer group one had the lowest percentage of dual-eligible patients while hospitals in peer group five had the highest percentage.

    Lehigh Valley Hospital - Schuylkill, a rural hospital in Pottsville, Pa., has experienced lower penalties since the program changes. The hospital fell into peer group five and will only receive a 0.54% penalty on its Medicare payments for fiscal 2020. That's much lower compared with fiscal 2018, before the CMS began risk-adjusting hospitals by dual-eligibility status, when it received a 1.68% penalty. The maximum penalty a hospital can receive is 3%.

    Dr. Matthew McCambridge, chief quality officer of Lehigh Valley Health Network, said the changes have provided much needed financial relief to the hospital. About 64% of its patients are insured by Medicare and about 18% are insured by Medicaid.

    The risk adjustment "is a nice nod to these kind of hospitals," he said. "It understands that the challenges related to readmissions are related to a lot of different social determinants of health."

    The CMS was mandated by Congress in 2016 to categorize hospitals by dual-eligibility status to address complaints from safety-net hospitals that they received higher penalties. Safety-net hospitals claim readmissions are harder for them to control because a patient's unique social risks may influence whether or not they are readmitted to the hospital within 30 days.

    Status on dual eligibility was selected because it's data the CMS can easily obtain and it's viewed as an indicator of poor socio-economic conditions. The population also accounts for a significant percentage of Medicare spending because patients usually have complex healthcare needs.

    The results this year show once again the risk-adjustment change to the readmissions program had its intended effect, which hospitals are pleased with. "CMS' incorporation of peer grouping in the readmissions penalty program was an important first step to account for the impact of social risk factors on hospital readmissions performance," said Akin Demehin, the American Hospital Association's director of policy, in an email. "Peer grouping provides relief to many hospitals serving the poorest and most vulnerable communities."

    Similar to last year, it's rare for a hospital in peer group five to get dinged with a 3% penalty. Of the 626 hospitals in peer group five, just four will receive a 3% penalty. Further, 406 will receive a 1% penalty or lower. The penalties will apply to Medicare fee-for-service payments beginning Oct. 1.

    Many hospitals in peer group five likely experienced lower penalties because they have just slightly above average readmission rates compared with hospitals nationally, said Dr. Karen Joynt Maddox, assistant professor at Washington University School of Medicine, who has studied the readmissions program.

    Some hospitals in peer group five still received a high penalty but it's likely only because their dual-eligibile patient population was much higher than their peers, with much higher readmissions.

    "It's still a large improvement from the old program in terms of being more equitable for hospitals with a high proportion of duals," she added.

    Hospitals on the other end of the spectrum—in peer group one—were more likely to get hit with higher penalties. Of the 626 hospitals included in peer group one, 27 will receive a 3% payment penalty. Also 287 hospitals in peer group one will receive a 1% or lower penalty, which is lower than the number of hospitals in peer group five.

    Even with the changes, hospitals are pushing the CMS to do more to account for social risk factors in the program going forward.

    The AHA's Demehin said, "Congress gave CMS the ability to refine its social risk factor adjustment approach over time, and because the research and science on this issue continues to evolve, the AHA has encouraged CMS to consider adopting more sophisticated approaches going forward."

    Although there remain barriers to finding new approaches. There still isn't industry consensus about the best data sources to use for factoring in social risk factors and how to acquire them.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    Ecri kids main mental health STATIC
    Pediatric mental health, workplace violence are top 2023 safety concerns: ECRI
    A patient safety student with the Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine vaccinates a patient.
    Patient safety courses a tough sell at medical schools
    Most Popular
    1
    More healthcare organizations at risk of credit default, Moody's says
    2
    Centene fills out senior executive team with new president, COO
    3
    SCAN, CareOregon plan to merge into the HealthRight Group
    4
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan unveils big push that lets physicians take on risk, reap rewards
    5
    Bright Health weighs reverse stock split as delisting looms
    Sponsored Content
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Digital Health
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Unwell in America
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top 25 Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Data Center
      • Data Center Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Newsletters
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing