Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Login
  • My Account
  • Logout
  • Register For Free
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Blogs
    • AI
    • Deals
    • Layoff Tracker
    • HLTH 2024
    • Sponsored Content: Vital Signs Blog
  • Opinion
    • Letters
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • 40 Under 40
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Innovators Awards
    • Diversity Leaders
    • Leading Women
    • Best in Business Awards
    • The 2030 Playbook Conference
    • Innovations in Patient Experience
    • Leading Women Conference & Awards Luncheon
    • Leadership Summit
    • Workforce Summit
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Diversity Leaders Gala
    • - Looking Ahead to 2025
    • - Financial Growth
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Looking Ahead to 2026
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
  • Data & Insights
    • Data & Insights Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Skilled Nursing Facilities
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
    • Sponsored Content
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Safety & Quality
November 16, 2023 05:00 AM

Hospitals worried about CMS pay-for-performance sepsis measure

Mari Devereaux
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    sepsis doctors
    MH Illustration/Getty Images/CDC

    Worries about care quality and antibiotic resistance are growing as a financial component is added to hospital compliance with federal requirements designed to reduce sepsis cases.

    The severe sepsis and septic shock management metrics were added to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program in 2015  and require facilities to report their sepsis treatment performance. Starting in January, hospitals will have to improve their compliance with the metrics to receive full points and avoid a penalty under the Hospital Value-Based Purchasing Program.

    Related: CDC announces new guidelines for sepsis programs, treatment

    How many points hospitals receive as part of the program is determined by their ability to improve performance on a variety of measures. Hospitals must reach a certain total score across all measures to receive full reimbursement.

    No widespread requirements around sepsis care existed prior to the introduction of CMS’ measure in 2015. More than 1.7 million U.S. adults develop sepsis each year, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Some clinicians and medical groups want to see the SEP-1 bundle, as the metrics are called, replaced by a measure focused on improving patient outcomes, as well as comprehensive guidelines that allow for more freedom in how providers treat patients.

    In response to this feedback, CMS has begun collaborating with the CDC to develop an electronic clinical quality measure for sepsis outcomes that is less burdensome on providers and gives a better picture of how hospitals are performing on metrics like 30-day mortality.

    “What we know about sepsis care is that it can present quite differently depending on the patient you're treating,” said Akin Demehin, senior director for quality and safety policy with the American Hospital Association. “Not all of those individual parameters within the sepsis bundle measure make sense for every patient.”

    To comply with the measure, which is part of CMS’ Inpatient Quality Reporting Program, providers must meet and document timed requirements for each sepsis patient around lactate measurements, blood cultures and administration of broad-spectrum antibiotics and intravenous fluids. In particular, all patients identified with sepsis must receive broad-spectrum antibiotics within three hours of diagnosis.

    Because the SEP-1 bundle does not track patient outcomes, a low or high compliance rate is not necessarily the best reflection of a hospital’s performance when it comes to reducing sepsis-related mortality or readmissions, Demehin said.

    There also are concerns about timing. Requiring providers to take action within a certain time frame doesn’t leave enough time to determine which antibiotics, if any, a patient needs, said Dr. Chanu Rhee, infectious disease and critical care physician at Brigham and Women's Hospital and an associate professor at Harvard Medical School.

    Giving sepsis patients unnecessary antibiotics runs the risk of them developing a resistance to antibiotics, Rhee said. Improper antibiotic use can also lead to kidney damage, various infections, hypersensitivity reactions and increased mortality rates.

    Nationwide, more than 2.8 million antimicrobial-resistant infections occur annually, leading to 35,000 deaths, according to 2019 data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Though CMS understands and supports the focus on antimicrobial stewardship, the agency is not aware of any evidence proving its sepsis measure has contributed to antibiotic overutilization, a spokesperson said in an email statement.

    While Brigham and Women’s Hospital typically performs well on timely antibiotic administration, it often struggles to comply with the requirements concerning the intravenous administration of fluids, as it would not be safe in many cases for patients with cardiac issues or borderline respiratory failure to be treated with so many fluids, Rhee said.

    “I don't think trying to shoot for 100% compliance makes sense, because to get to 100% compliance, you're going to have to do a lot of overtreatment,” she said. “Do we focus on trying to increase our hospital's SEP-1 scores just for payment purposes when we don't think they're going to actually lead to better patient outcomes?”

    On average, hospitals in 2022 were in compliance with the 2015 requirements for 59% of sepsis patients, according to CMS. Only six hospitals out of nearly 3,000 were in compliance for 100% of their patients.

    At Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, compliance with the sepsis measure and detecting cases of sepsis early have helped the facility improve rates of patient deterioration and mortality.

    The hospital will continue to track both its sepsis-related patient outcomes and its compliance with the SEP-1 bundle, said Dr. Edward Pollak, chief quality officer at Henry Ford Hospital and Henry Ford Medical Group. For every case of non-compliance, Henry Ford has a cross-functional team of physicians, nurses and quality team members investigate whether sepsis could have been addressed sooner.

    Pollak said sometimes there are opportunities to improve compliance without compromising patient care, and sometimes there aren’t.

    Some providers believe the requirements are associated with better patient outcomes, despite worries that the SEP-1 bundle becoming a pay-for-performance measure will force more clinicians to adopt sepsis treatment protocols that are too rigid.

    CMS has cited several studies that suggest immediate antibiotic administration, specifically in patients with septic shock, has led to reductions in mortality, readmissions and hospital length of stay.

    For the last nine months, the University of Kansas Medical Center, in Kansas City, has been in compliance with the bundle for 100% of patients coming into its emergency department with sepsis.

    “Even though our mortality rate was already sitting at 5% for those patients, it's [gone] down even further since we got ourselves more compliant, into the 3% range,” said Dr. Steven Simpson, board chair of the Sepsis Alliance and professor of medicine at the University of Kansas.

    Adding a financial component to the measure will ensure even more hospitals spend more time and effort on adequate sepsis treatment for patients, Simpson said.

    “We need hospitals in America to be doing the basics uniformly,” he said. “Then we can talk about adding on more complexity or personalized medicine layered on top.”

    Rather than dictating what providers can and cannot do with regard to sepsis treatment, organizations like the Infectious Diseases Society of America and American Hospital Association have recommended CMS offer more detailed guidance around infection control processes, antibiotic de-escalation, and diagnostic tests that can more quickly identify sepsis causes.

    Hospitals should also be required to track and report how long it takes to administer antibiotics from the time they are ordered for a patient with septic shock, Rhee said.

    “Early recognition and treatment matter, but there are a lot of steps along the way that are important and ultimately affect the outcome of patients with sepsis,” she said.

    Related Articles
    AI can reduce sepsis-related deaths, study shows
    Just 49% of hospitals follow CMS' sepsis treatment protocols
    Sepsis treatment costs shoot up $1.5 billion for hospitals over three years
    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    patient nurse grade
    Leapfrog hospital grades improve with help from AI, tech
    Leapfrog grades hospital
    Leapfrog makes updates to annual hospital survey
    Most Popular
    1
    UnitedHealth under criminal investigation for Medicare fraud: WSJ
    2
    States, providers face brunt of GOP Medicaid cuts plan
    3
    UnitedHealth Group to cut Medicare drug plan commissions
    4
    Federal dementia pilot has rocky rollout for some providers
    5
    'Legendary' Hemsley takes over at UnitedHealth amid rough seas
    Sponsored Content
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Help Center
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2025. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Blogs
      • AI
      • Deals
      • Layoff Tracker
      • HLTH 2024
      • Sponsored Content: Vital Signs Blog
    • Opinion
      • Letters
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • 40 Under 40
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Innovators Awards
        • Diversity Leaders
        • Leading Women
        • Best in Business Awards
      • Conferences
        • The 2030 Playbook Conference
        • Innovations in Patient Experience
        • Leading Women Conference & Awards Luncheon
        • Leadership Summit
        • Workforce Summit
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Diversity Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Looking Ahead to 2025
        • - Financial Growth
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Looking Ahead to 2026
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
      • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
    • Data & Insights
      • Data & Insights Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Skilled Nursing Facilities
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing
      • Sponsored Content