Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • ESG: THE NEW IMPERATIVE
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • COVID-19
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Transformation
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Digital Health
  • Insights
    • ACA 10 Years After
    • Best Practices
    • Special Reports
    • Innovations
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top 25 Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Supply Chain
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • Data Center
    • Data Center Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • MORE +
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Newsletters
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Policy
March 22, 2022 05:00 AM

Q&A with Elizabeth Fowler of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation: ‘We want to be a good partner to good actors’

Maya Goldman
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Liz Fowler

    Elizabeth Fowler, director of the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation (CMMI) and deputy administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, discusses the decision-making behind recent changes to Medicare direct contracting models.

    What would you say to progressives and other groups that wanted to see Medicare direct contracting thrown out or changed more drastically than you have?

    I would start by saying that we did, in fact, permanently cancel the Geographic Direct Contracting Model, which has been on hold since March of last year. And there was a lot of confusion between the Geo Model and the Global and Professional Direct Contracting Model. It seems like some of the criticism about GPDC was based on some features included in the Geo Model, so I hope this step puts to rest some of that criticism.

    Second, we made important changes that address concerns raised by critics. In addition to the focus on health equity and the shift toward provider-led organizations, we tightened the risk adjustment policy—and of course the increased monitoring and compliance activities.

    Finally, I just want to add that an immediate end to GPDC—or any innovation model—could result in care disruption for beneficiaries. Patients served by accountable care organizations can receive care that they might not get under traditional Medicare, like greater support managing chronic conditions, supporting transitioning from the hospital to their homes, transportation assistance and in some cases, Part B cost-sharing assistance. Ending the model would also be disruptive to participants, and we want to be a good partner. We want to be a good partner to good actors, including many who have succeeded in prior CMMI models.

    Some people have also raised concerns that even with such big changes to a model, CMMI might lose the trust of some participants. How do you plan to mitigate that?

    We have to do a good job of communicating the changes we’re making and why we’re making them. And I’ll tell you, we’ve received a lot of positive feedback about the changes from participants. This isn’t surprising given that a lot of the changes we made were in response to the experience participants had during the first year of the program. In fact, we’ve talked to participants in other models who are now asking if we’ll consider adding the health equity policies to those models.

    We value our model participants and understand the effort and resources that go into participating. Our goal is to be transparent with model participants, the general public and particularly beneficiary groups as we work together on important information that we need to improve models over time. Regarding current model participants, I think it bears saying that those who meet the requirements of the ACO REACH model who are participating today will be able to continue participating. We’re committed to value-based care. We believe the infrastructure investments made to date will continue to provide valuable benefits to Medicare beneficiaries and to the Medicare trust funds.

    This all will require a lot of relationship building and trust building with participants, both current and future. Are there any specific activities in that sphere that you plan to undertake?

    Regarding the monitoring and compliance activities, again, we want to ensure that beneficiaries are receiving the best care possible. So we’re committed to making sure that (direct contracting entities) this year and ACOs going forward adhere to the requirements of their participation agreements with CMS. Doing that involves monitoring compliance for both GPDC and ACO REACH. So in addition to reviewing marketing materials and communications sent to beneficiaries, and investigating beneficiary complaints, we’ll be using more data analytics to monitor use of services over time, and comparing that to a reference population. This will allow us to assess whether there have been changes in beneficiaries’ access to care. We’ll look annually at whether beneficiaries are being shifted into Medicare Advantage and looking more closely at inappropriate risk score growth. We plan to continue our audits of contracts that ACOs have with providers and learn more about their downstream arrangements, and identify any concerns. And we’ll monitor for non-compliance with prohibitions against anti-competitive behavior and misuse of beneficiary data. We have the capacity today and we are ready to carry out these new activities.

    “Our goal is to be transparent with model participants,
    the general public and particularly beneficiary groups as we
    work together … to improve models over time.”

    Where does the funding for these activities come from? Do you expect this to create any extra burden on model participants?

    We don’t expect that it will create a burden for model participants. It will be more of a burden on CMS. I think we have the data needed to make sure we have the resources and capabilities. We can use some existing resources, and I need to make sure they’re not stretched too thin, but we think we have the capacity to do it.

    You’ve mentioned health equity. ACO REACH addresses those issues head-on, and we know this is a major priority for CMMI models going forward. Tell us more about how you plan to monitor the models’ health equity impacts.

    This is a really important point. As I mentioned, we’re really pleased with the direction of these new policies. You can expect future CMMI models to include features from ACO REACH, like the requirement of a health equity plan. In fact, regarding ACO REACH, this design really laid a lot of groundwork for our thinking and we engaged in partners across CMS and HHS to operationalize this model with meaningful requirements to advance health equity. We’re continuing to explore avenues on how to increase the number of beneficiaries from underserved communities, in part by increasing participation of providers that serve them. We’re looking more closely at the application and selection processes for our previous models to identify barriers and challenges that some providers might have faced in participating, and our findings will inform potential changes.

    Download Modern Healthcare’s app to stay informed when industry news breaks.

    We would be remiss not to mention the COVID-19 public health emergency. What role might CMMI play in continuing new care delivery systems made possible by waivers once the PHE is over?

    We’re having those conversations right now at CMS. It comes back to the question of what is the purpose of CMMI. I believe it should be used to test ideas for ways to make the health system better. If we discovered something that worked really well during the pandemic, those good ideas should become a permanent part of the CMS programs. And if there are care-delivery flexibilities and innovations from the PHE that increased access to care, then we should consider including and testing them and further CMMI models. We intend to be doing that review and looking more closely for sure.

    Related Articles
    The Check Up: Elizabeth Fowler of Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation
    CMS redesigns Direct Contracting into an ACO model
    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    Policy and outpatient main
    What policies 3 CEOs say they want to drive health innovation
    Indiana hospitals restrict visitors over flu rates
    Indiana hospitals restrict visitors over flu rates
    Most Popular
    1
    More healthcare organizations at risk of credit default, Moody's says
    2
    Centene fills out senior executive team with new president, COO
    3
    SCAN, CareOregon plan to merge into the HealthRight Group
    4
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan unveils big push that lets physicians take on risk, reap rewards
    5
    Bright Health weighs reverse stock split as delisting looms
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare Alert: Sign up for this breaking news email to be kept in the loop as urgent healthcare business news unfolds.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • COVID-19
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Digital Health
    • Insights
      • ACA 10 Years After
      • Best Practices
      • Special Reports
      • Innovations
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top 25 Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Supply Chain
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Data Center
      • Data Center Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • MORE +
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Newsletters
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing