Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • ESG: THE NEW IMPERATIVE
Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • COVID-19
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Transformation
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Digital Health
  • Insights
    • ACA 10 Years After
    • Best Practices
    • Special Reports
    • Innovations
  • Data/Lists
    • Rankings/Lists
    • Interactive Databases
    • Data Points
  • Op-Ed
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Awards
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top 25 Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
    • Women in Healthcare
    • - Luminaries
    • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
    • - Leaders to Watch
    • - Luminaries
    • - Top 25 Women Leaders
    • - Women to Watch
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Custom Media Event: ESG Summit
    • Transformation Summit
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Supply Chain Revenue Cycle
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Strategic Marketing
    • - Virtual Health
  • Listen
    • Podcast - Next Up
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • MORE +
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Newsletters
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Transformation Hub

Where healthcare challenges find solutions

  • Patients
  • Operations
  • Care Delivery
  • Payment
Payment
November 09, 2021 05:12 PM

MedPAC wades back into outpatient site-neutral payments

Maya Goldman
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Copy of mh20190520_lead-regional_outpatient_WEB_i.jpg

    The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission wants to keep exploring aligned payment for care provided at hospital outpatient departments, ambulatory surgical centers and physician offices in an effort to reduce incentives for healthcare consolidation and make sure beneficiaries aren't paying more than needed, commissioners said Tuesday.

    While hospitals can provide ambulatory care in those three settings, Medicare's fee-for-service reimbursement system is different for each category. These differences in payment rates can lead to healthcare consolidation, because providers in higher-cost settings are incentivized to acquire providers in lower-cost settings and bill at higher payment rates, MedPAC staff said.

    Hospital consolidation is already prevalent, and service delivery reflects this change. For example, 35.2% of chemotherapy administration occurred at hospital outpatient departments in 2012, compared to 50.9% in 2019, MedPAC staff said. This shift generally leads to higher beneficiary cost sharing.

    But aligning outpatient payment is still difficult. Not all services provided at an outpatient department can be delivered in offices or ASCs, as they're not covered under those payment systems. The OPPS and ASC payment systems also have different payment units than the fee schedule.

    Download Modern Healthcare’s app to stay informed when industry news breaks.

    To tackle these issues, MedPAC staff first put services into the payment classification system from OPPS, and aligned each classification with the setting that provided the largest share of that care. For 57 out of 162 classifications, payment could be aligned across all three ambulatory settings, leading to a 12% decrease in cost sharing and program outlay costs under OPPS and 6% under the ASC payment system. Rates from OPPS could be aligned with ASC rates for another 11 classifications, which also led to a small decrease in beneficiary cost sharing and program outlays. But MedPAC staff caution that rural areas may have fewer ASCs. If ASC rates are aligned with OPPS and hospitals respond to lower ASC rates by providing these services less, that could lead to access problems.

    MedPAC staff say hospitals would see a decrease in overall Medicare revenue if officials made the outlined payment changes, but this decrease could disproportionately impact hospitals serving vulnerable populations. To remedy this, MedPAC staff came up with a stop-loss policy that would limit overall Medicare revenue loss for hospitals with an above-average disproportionate share hospital percentage.

    Commissioners expressed strong interest in continuing to look into ambulatory site neutrality.

    "I think this is urgent. It is not something that can wait 10 years — by then it'll be kind of irrelevant in terms of the amount of consolidation that will have happened," Commissioner Dr. Lawrence Casalino said.

    Despite the enthusiasm, many wanted to tweak MedPAC staff's method for determining which of the three settings should govern payment for a service. Some commissioners questioned the use of one year of data to make that determination, while others said the system needs to take patient characteristics into account, as other unified payment policies do. Several commissioners said setting the payment based on where the procedure is most often performed misses important information, and suggested adjusting for acuity.

    "To me, the whole thing kind of hinges on this," Casalino said. "The method we use to determine which of the three sites would set the payment rate is obviously critical, and I think probably deserves plenty more thought."

    Commissioners were also concerned with the potential impact of site-neutral payments on safety-net and rural hospitals, and several members suggested sharing savings from the policy with these facilities. Commissioner Lynn Barr, who currently leads Caravan Health and previously served as chief information officer for a rural hospital, also proposed MedPAC think about exempting rural hospitals from this system altogether.

    Vice Chair Paul Ginsburg said savings shouldn't be the main goal of site neutrality. Instead, MedPAC should focus on bringing payment closer to relative costs for delivery. This could include paying more for services unique to the hospital outpatient department, he said.

    "Perhaps even this would make it more politically feasible to move forward and be somewhat less of a threat to the viability of hospitals," Ginsburg added.

    Hospital pushback to such a policy is likely. Hospitals have come out strongly against previous site-neutral payment models. When the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 aimed to align the outpatient prospective payment system with the physician fee schedule rates by establishing site-neutral payment for new off-campus hospital outpatient departments, the American Hospital Association sued the federal government over the policy. The Supreme Court declined to hear AHA's appeal of the suit in June.

    But this change hasn't had much of an effect on actual payment because it applies to few OPPS payments, MedPAC staff said.

    Congress also directed the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services in 2014 to create a unified payment system for post-acute care, a prototype for which is due next year. However, post-acute providers and hospital lobbyists are now pushing Congress to reset that timeline.

    MedPAC plans to continue discussing this issue but won't make recommendations on site-neutral payment for ambulatory services this cycle.

    Tags: Payment, Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC), Outpatient care, Ambulatory Care, American Hospital Association (AHA), Payment reform, This Week in Healthcare, Payment, Transformation, Transformation Hub, Policy
    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    Mayo Clinic and UnitedHealthcare_i.jpg
    Mayo Clinic, UnitedHealthcare reach network agreement
    dialysis
    CMS proposes pay boost for ESRD facilities
    Sponsored Content
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2022. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • COVID-19
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Digital Health
    • Insights
      • ACA 10 Years After
      • Best Practices
      • Special Reports
      • Innovations
    • Data/Lists
      • Rankings/Lists
      • Interactive Databases
      • Data Points
    • Op-Ed
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Awards
      • Nominate/Eligibility
      • 100 Most Influential People
      • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
      • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
      • Excellence in Governance
      • Health Care Hall of Fame
      • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
      • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
      • Top 25 Innovators
      • Diversity in Healthcare
        • - Luminaries
        • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
        • - Leaders to Watch
      • Women in Healthcare
        • - Luminaries
        • - Top 25 Women Leaders
        • - Women to Watch
    • Events
      • Conferences
        • Transformation Summit
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Leadership Symposium
      • Galas
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Supply Chain Revenue Cycle
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Strategic Marketing
        • - Virtual Health
      • Webinars
      • Custom Media Event: ESG Summit
    • Listen
      • Podcast - Next Up
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • MORE +
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Newsletters
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing