Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • ESG: THE NEW IMPERATIVE
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • COVID-19
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Transformation
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Digital Health
  • Insights
    • ACA 10 Years After
    • Best Practices
    • Special Reports
    • Innovations
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top 25 Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Supply Chain
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • Data Center
    • Data Center Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • MORE +
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Newsletters
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Payment
October 06, 2020 03:17 PM

CMS' plan to end inpatient-only list worries providers

Michael Brady
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Getty Images/iStockphoto

    Providers want CMS to proceed cautiously in its attempt to phase out paying for some services only in inpatient settings, according to comments on CMS' proposed outpatient payment rule due Monday.

    CMS in August proposed to phase out the inpatient-only list over three years. The agency claimed the list wasn't necessary, saying physicians should use their knowledge, judgment and assess patient needs to determine the right care site. Under the proposal, Medicare would start paying for nearly 270 musculoskeletal-related services delivered in outpatient departments in 2021.

    Providers asked CMS to stop or slow the payment shift, citing safety and quality concerns. The American Hospital Association and the American Medical Association said CMS should continue its current policy of removing services from the list on a case-by-case basis. AHA said, "it would be premature and myopic" to end the inpatient-only list because many of the services are high-risk. Independent experts warned CMS was too optimistic about how providers decide where to deliver care.

    "There is no guarantee that physicians will always select the most appropriate setting. Factors other than clinical knowledge and judgment, such as financial considerations, can affect these decisions," the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission said.

    Hospitals worried the changes would hurt their finances by shifting more care from higher-cost inpatient settings to lower-cost outpatient settings.

    "It would be unconscionable to finalize this policy when the financial impact of the COVID-19 public health emergency … has already been devastating for hospitals — and there still remains an uncertain future as to the path of the pandemic," AHA said.

    Physicians worried it would require clinicians to do more paperwork.

    "Hospitals, as well as private payors, often influence determinations regarding the appropriate site-of-service for procedures and services. The burden then falls on the physician to convince a hospital or payor that a particular patient should receive a given procedure in an inpatient setting due to patient safety concerns," AMA said.

    The American Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons said it was concerned the two-midnight rule would stay in effect during the phase-out "in light of the ongoing confusion surrounding the (rule) and the subsequent decisions by hospitals and private payers to require that some procedures … default to the outpatient setting."

    Several commenters recommended CMS phase out the inpatient-only list over a longer period and study each change's effects before removing more services from the list. They also said CMS should give stakeholders more opportunities to weigh-in on any proposed changes.

    Hospital groups had mixed opinions about CMS' proposed changes to how it decides which surgical procedures to reimburse under the ambulatory surgical center payment system. The agency had asked providers to comment on whether it should use a nomination process to decide which procedures to cover or change the regulations it currently uses to make those determinations. Some hospital groups opposed making any changes, while others supported a nomination process.

    "The nomination alternative should include a requirement that any individual or group that nominates a procedure or procedures for inclusion in the ASC (covered procedures list) should not be involved in the process of approving the nominated procedure or procedures to the list," MedPAC said.

    Hospital groups were especially concerned about CMS' proposal to end the agency's current exclusion criteria, which bans Medicare from reimbursing ASCs for procedures with high-risk characteristics, including those that generally result in extensive blood loss or are life-threatening.

    The Ambulatory Surgery Center Association supported all of CMS' proposed changes to the ASC covered procedures list, saying it "encourages further policy changes to ensure that the appropriate site of care is determined by healthcare providers."

    Hospitals groups and MedPAC cautioned CMS' proposal to require prior authorization for complex services like cervical fusion with disc removal and implant of spinal neurostimulators could lower Medicare beneficiaries' access to care.

    "As CMS expands prior authorization requirements based solely on increases in services, then it is possible that more services will be subject to prior authorization requirements, particularly in light of CMS' proposal to eliminate the (inpatient only) list," the Association of American Medical Colleges said.

    Hospitals continued to oppose CMS' planned cuts to the 340B drug discount program, site-neutral payment policy and changes to support physician-owned hospital expansion. They generally supported changes to the agency's hospital quality star ratings.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    charging for advice
    How much is a MyChart message worth? It's complicated
    dialysis
    ESRD providers to receive pay boost in 2023
    Most Popular
    1
    More healthcare organizations at risk of credit default, Moody's says
    2
    Centene fills out senior executive team with new president, COO
    3
    SCAN, CareOregon plan to merge into the HealthRight Group
    4
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan unveils big push that lets physicians take on risk, reap rewards
    5
    Bright Health weighs reverse stock split as delisting looms
    Sponsored Content
    Daily Finance Newsletter: Sign up to receive daily news and data that has a direct impact on the business and financing of healthcare.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • COVID-19
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Digital Health
    • Insights
      • ACA 10 Years After
      • Best Practices
      • Special Reports
      • Innovations
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top 25 Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Supply Chain
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Data Center
      • Data Center Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • MORE +
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Newsletters
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing