Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • ESG: THE NEW IMPERATIVE
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • COVID-19
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Transformation
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Digital Health
  • Insights
    • ACA 10 Years After
    • Best Practices
    • Special Reports
    • Innovations
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top 25 Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Supply Chain
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • Data Center
    • Data Center Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • MORE +
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Newsletters
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Not-for-Profit Hospitals
October 09, 2020 04:53 PM

Sutter and Calif. AG revamp their search for antitrust monitor

Tara Bannow
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    Sutter Health, California's Attorney General and several health plans are headed back to the drawing board in their search for a watchdog to oversee the health system's compliance with the terms of its antitrust settlement.

    Not-for-profit Sutter and the plaintiffs, which also include UFCW & Employers Benefit Trust, will submit a new formal plan for selecting a monitor by Oct. 15, with a hearing Oct. 19 on the proposed plan. After that, the selection process is expected to take 3 months.

    San Francisco Superior Court Judge Anne-Christine Massullo rejected the preliminary settlement agreement in the antitrust lawsuit after after the Sacramento, Calif.-based health system and other parties only interviewed white men for the monitor position. The preliminary settlement agreement required Sutter to have a monitor handle complaints over potential anticompetitive business practices for up to 13 years.

    "The idea that in 2020 there are only five white men in the United States who are qualified to be interviewed for this position is anathema to what are today basic notions of fairness, equity and justice," Judge Massullo wrote in her Sept. 22 order.

    Judge Massullo said the selection process was done hastily and in secret, as both sides worked against the clock to avoid a trial. The day the parties announced their preliminary settlement in October 2019 was the same day opening arguments were expected to start. At that time, the judge had expected a final settlement by March 2020.

    Sutter was accused of driving up prices in Northern California through illegal, anticompetitive business practices, claims it denies.

    The health system has agreed to terms that include limits on how much it can charge out-of-network insurers. Insurers, employers and self-funded plans also will no longer have to include all of Sutter's hospitals, clinics or other commercial products in their plans' networks, among others.

    None of those rules will take effect, however, until Massullo approves the final settlement. In the meantime, court records show Sutter has declined to abide by the terms of the preliminary settlement prior to its final approval.

    Insurers UnitedHealthcare and Heath Net said their contracts with Sutter expire at the end of 2020 and they want their next ones to comply with the settlement terms. United said it tried to include anti-tiering and anti-steering provisions in its new contract, but Sutter informed the insurer it did not want to negotiate based on the preliminary settlement provisions because the final approval will likely be delayed.

    "United has long offered tiered and premium savings products to its members across the country, and it would like to make those offerings available for Northern California members in light of the provisions in the proposed final judgment, and in anticipation of its approval," wrote Janet Lundbye, United's vice president of network management.

    Health Net wrote that it is concerned if the court doesn't approve the final settlement by the end of the year, Sutter won't agree to abide by the settlement terms in its next contract.

    "It just underscores that without antitrust action, these behaviors aren't changing," said Elizabeth Mitchell, CEO of the Pacific Business Group on Health, an employer coalition that includes 20 of the lawsuit's class members.

    In response to the plans' claims, Sutter spokeswoman Lisa Page wrote in an email, "The settlement is still working its way through the approval process with the court."

    Flawed monitor search

    In her order denying the preliminary settlement, Massullo wrote that the California Attorney General's office and Sutter began their hunt for a monitor in September 2019, soliciting candidates by invitation.

    The parties had agreed on a set of standards. They wanted a monitor with no conflicts, who was well-versed in antitrust law, had experience with healthcare operations and had previously served as a monitor in a healthcare case of similar magnitude. They ultimately contacted six candidates, five of whom applied. All five were white males.

    They ultimately chose Jesse Caplan, managing director of corporate oversight with Affiliated Monitors in Boston. They said his application was boosted because his team includes Dionne Lomax. Lomax, a black woman, is a managing director of antitrust and trade regulation with Affiliated Monitors and a lecturer in Boston University's law and business schools.

    During the selection process, Sutter's attorney identified Lomax as a potential candidate, and the parties encouraged her to apply after they had picked their initial six candidates. She declined to apply, and instead joined Caplan's application.

    Massullo wrote that Lomax did not feel she was able to apply because she lacked the resources to take the lead position.

    "Diverse candidates are not prohibited from applying, but they are often found to lack the 'experience' or 'resources' that white male candidates possess on paper, and thus are weeded out of the process before getting even an opportunity to establish themselves," Massullo wrote.

    Massullo also said the selection process could have been public.

    In an era of appropriately increased sensitivity around diversity and inclusion, the monitor selection process should reflect that, PBGH's Mitchell said.

    "There is a limited pool of people with the necessary expertise to appropriately monitor the implementation of the injunctive relief provisions, which we believe are incredibly important, so we appreciate the diligence they are applying to select the monitor," she said.

    Sutter has also fought to get information in more than 300 court documents kept under seal so they won't be publicly accessible. The judge has allowed some of those documents be kept under seal.

    "As part of this process, it is routine for parties to file motions to seal certain confidential materials," Page said. "Sutter, the plaintiffs, and third parties such as health plans have all filed such motions in this case."

    The antitrust case against Sutter has stretched on for years. UEBT initiated the lead case in April 2014. California Attorney General Xavier Becerra added his case, which is now consolidated with the UEBT case, in March 2018. The proposed settlement in October 2019 followed years of contentious litigation.

    "We believe the injunctive relief provisions, assuming they're approved, will make a very significant difference in the healthcare marketplace to avoid anticompetitive practices," Mitchell said. "So we are eager for approval."

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    Dr. Rhonda Medows
    Dr. Rhonda Medows of Providence Health: ‘We embrace that old adage: It doesn’t count unless you measure it’
    iStock-1203342306_WEB_i.jpg
    ProMedica fundraising $20M to invest in underserved Michigan city
    Most Popular
    1
    More healthcare organizations at risk of credit default, Moody's says
    2
    Centene fills out senior executive team with new president, COO
    3
    SCAN, CareOregon plan to merge into the HealthRight Group
    4
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan unveils big push that lets physicians take on risk, reap rewards
    5
    Bright Health weighs reverse stock split as delisting looms
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare A.M. Newsletter: Sign up to receive a comprehensive weekday morning newsletter designed for busy healthcare executives who need the latest and most important healthcare news and analysis.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • COVID-19
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Digital Health
    • Insights
      • ACA 10 Years After
      • Best Practices
      • Special Reports
      • Innovations
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top 25 Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Supply Chain
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Data Center
      • Data Center Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • MORE +
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Newsletters
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing