Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Blogs
    • AI
    • Deals
    • Layoff Tracker
    • HIMSS 2023
  • Opinion
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - AI and Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
  • Data & Insights
    • Data & Insights Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Medicare
April 17, 2020 02:21 PM

HHS: Appeals court should defer to agency on site-neutral payments

Michael Brady
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Modern Healthcare Illustration / Getty Images

    The Trump administration on Friday pushed three federal appeals judges to resurrect its site-neutral payment policy for office visits, saying the panel should defer to HHS' expertise.

    HHS determined that too many office visits were occurring in hospital outpatient departments, which was increasing taxpayer spending under Medicare's outpatient prospective payment system. Congress gave the agency the power to reduce that service volume, Department of Justice attorney Alisa Klein told the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.

    Since Congress defined methods broadly under the Medicare statute, the justices should defer to the agency's interpretation of the law since Congress didn't speak to the precise issue at hand, Klein argued.

    "Congress may not have anticipated what was not a problem until years (after it changed the law), which is that for these particular services . . . you had a perverse incentive introduced by a Medicare payment differential," Klein said during Friday's oral arguments, which were held telephonically due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

    The payment difference between evaluation and management services performed in outpatient clinics and physician practices led hospitals to buy up neighboring practices, which cost taxpayers money because Medicare paid more for the same services, she said.

    It's the same argument that didn't hold water with U.S. District Judge Rosemary Collyer last fall when she sided with hospitals, ruling that Congress didn't give HHS the ability to change reimbursement rates to lower utilization and that the law required payment changes to be budget-neutral. The three-judge panel on Friday did not show any sign of which side it would take.

    "Could a method include simply not paying for a service?" Judge Patricia Millett said. "What if the (HHS) secretary just, at some point, said here's a procedure that I just don't think should be performed in outpatient clinics at all?"

    That would mean that any amount of that procedure would be too high and effectively bar it from being performed inside an outpatient setting under Medicare, Millett said.

    Judge Sri Srinivasan acknowledged that some of the law's language was a "feather in (the government's) quiver," but he wondered whether other parts of the statute contradicted HHS' interpretation of the law since they detail how the agency should calculate payments.

    Catherine Stetson, an attorney for Hogan Lovells representing hospitals, argued that HHS has two ways to make payment adjustments. It can make targeted, budget-neutral payment changes or adjust the conversion factor to increase or decrease all payments under the outpatient prospective payment system. The agency cannot make targeted payment adjustments that aren't budget-neutral, according to Stetson.

    "I think the reason that Ms. Klein was resisting calling this an adjustment (is because there's) a very specific list, as Chief Justice Srinivasan said, of fee schedule adjustments," Stetson said.

    The court needs to decide whether payment changes are one of the methods outlined by Congress in the statute to determine whether it's reviewable, said Judge Merrick Garland.

    "There's no dispute that there's a bar on judicial review of methods," Millett said. "If this is a method, there's no review of how well or sloppily or reasonably they adopted the method."

    But Garland suggested that the law could allow for targeted adjustments that aren't budget-neutral if service volume increases after HHS adjusts payments using the methods outlined by Stetson.

    If the court finds that payment adjustments are a method, as defined by Congress, it would be a big win for the Trump administration and advocates for site-neutral payments because the court wouldn't be able to review the changes. Hospitals are hoping they find the opposite.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    older people - Medicare - insurance
    Medicare Advantage marketing was different in 2023. That's no accident.
    older people - Medicare - insurance
    CMS proposes raising Medicare Advantage marketing, ratings stakes
    Most Popular
    1
    Centene to lay off 2,000 workers
    2
    How health systems are battling price-gouging allegations
    3
    Senate advances bill to temporarily aid hospitals, health centers
    4
    Elevance, Blue Cross Louisiana halt $2.5B proposed deal
    5
    Tower Health to sell urgent care centers, close others
    Sponsored Content
    Daily Dose Newsletter: Sign up to receive a late afternoon weekday roundup of that day’s breaking news and developments in healthcare.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Help Center
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Blogs
      • AI
      • Deals
      • Layoff Tracker
      • HIMSS 2023
    • Opinion
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - AI and Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
      • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
    • Data & Insights
      • Data & Insights Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing