Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • ESG: THE IMPLEMENTATION IMPERATIVE
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Digital Health
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Transformation
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Unwell in America
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top 25 Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • Data Center
    • Data Center Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Newsletters
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Medicaid
March 27, 2021 01:00 AM

Threat of Medicaid cuts weighs on outlook for safety-net providers

Maggie Van Dyke
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    A provider giving a vaccine to a patient.
    HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM

    Henry Ford Health System in Detroit treated more Medicaid patients in 2020 while it was dealing with the clinical and financial challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    It’s budget season in most states, meaning safety-net hospitals are anxiously waiting to hear whether their Medicaid payments will be cut.

    The concerns regarding Medicaid reimbursement reductions are greater given the pandemic-related threat of an economic downturn, which generally translates to more people being added to the program when tax revenue may be falling.

    “It’s this perfect storm that leads to states having to make some very difficult decisions,” said Matt Salo, executive director of the National Association of Medicaid Directors, who saw this pattern play out during the Great Recession of 2008 and the 2001 recession.

    On a net basis, states lost $13.6 billion in Medicaid revenue comparing the periods of April through December in 2019 and 2020, in order to estimate the effects of the pandemic, according to the Urban Institute.

    That sizable revenue loss is smaller, though, than what some expected. “The budget outlook looks a lot better than we thought it would, although there are certainly states with big revenue deficits,” Salo said.

    This time around, states that rely heavily on tourism and oil and gas have seen much of the revenue declines. For instance, Alaska’s revenue fell by 41.4%, Florida’s by 11.3%, Texas’ by 10.4% and New York’s by 4.1%, according to the Urban Institute.

    Meanwhile, 22 states collected more revenue during the pandemic months of 2020 (April-December) than they did during the same period in 2019, ranging from a 0.1% increase in Maryland to a 10.4% increase in Idaho.

    Experts credit federal stimulus money, including unemployment supplement payments, with shoring up consumer spending and associated sales taxes. The 6.2% enhanced federal Medicaid match known as the federal medical assistance percentage, or FMAP, is also helping.

    In addition, many states took advantage of risk corridors to carve back dollars from Medicaid managed-care plans when utilization fell dramatically due to COVID. These dollars helped some states, such as Michigan, cover COVID-related losses.

    Impact on providers

    Hospitals and other providers should not be shy if they want to influence state decisions related to Medicaid rates. Shawn Stack, director of perspectives and analysis at the Healthcare Financial Management Association, recommends having a dialogue with state policymakers. “Engagement is important, not only to contest Medicaid cuts, but to educate policy folks on what is happening real-time, both positively and negatively, in the healthcare community,” he said.

    One topic of discussion: the financial challenges that Medicaid providers face. Safety-net hospitals were already operating on relatively low margins prior to COVID-19. The aggregate 2018 operating margin was 2.5% among the 300 members of America’s Essential Hospitals, while hospitals nationwide had a 7.6% aggregate operating margin in 2018.

    At Henry Ford Hospital in Detroit, the percentage of Medicaid patients rose from 23.5% in 2019 to 25% in 2020, part of a 2 percentage-point shift from commercial to Medicaid and uninsured. (Across Henry Ford Health System, 20% of patients are enrolled in Medicaid.)

    This shift contributed to greater Medicaid losses. In 2019, the cost of caring for Medicaid patients across Henry Ford was $135 million more than the system received in Medicaid payments. In 2020, the cost-to-reimbursement difference rose to $166 million, an increase of 23%.

    “We had a lot more Medicaid patients in inpatient beds with high acuity due to COVID because vulnerable populations have been disproportionately impacted by COVID,” said Robin Damschroder, Henry Ford’s executive vice president and chief financial officer.

    The health system relies on disproportionate-share supplemental payments and 340B drug program reimbursement to cover part of its Medicaid losses. Being a large health system with its own health plan and a diverse payer mix also gives Henry Ford flexibility in managing its finances.

    “We are an integrated delivery system, which is a very efficient way to coordinate care,” Damschroder said. “There are programs like Medicaid where we are going to lose money, and traditionally the commercial programs help balance out those losses.”

    In fiscal 2020 and 2021, Michigan hospitals benefited from Medicaid outpatient rate increases. Henry Ford’s 2020 average Medicaid outpatient rate increased 8.8% compared with the prior year. The governor’s draft budget for fiscal 2022 does not mention any Medicaid cuts.

    In contrast, providers in other states had to absorb Medicaid cuts over the past year and are preparing for additional cuts. New York, for example, issued a 1.5% across-the-board Medicaid rate reduction in fiscal 2021, which ends March 31, and has included a 1% across-the-board reduction in its draft fiscal 2022 budget, although this may change after the state receives federal dollars from the American Rescue Plan Act.

    “We get nervous about any cuts to funding, especially in Medicaid, which historically has paid less compared to Medicare and private insurance,” said Erin O’Malley, senior director of policy at America’s Essential Hospitals. “We see the low rates associated with the Medicaid program as a way of undervaluing the provision of care to Medicaid beneficiaries.”

    Near-term state Medicaid outlook

    When it comes to Medicaid payments, “It’s a moving target given where states are as they go through their legislative sessions,” said Tom Betlach, a partner at Speire Healthcare Strategies.

    Most state fiscal years begin on July 1, which means officials are developing fiscal 2021-22 budgets amid continued uncertainty about the coronavirus, particularly contagious variants and whether vaccines can be administered fast enough to turn the economy around.

    The $195 billion in state aid included in the American Rescue Plan Act is intended, in part, to help states plug budget holes created by the pandemic. Time will tell whether states choose to use that aid to bolster Medicaid or address other pressing priorities.

    “We’re not out of the woods yet,” Betlach said. He is concerned about the expiration of the enhanced FMAP, which has been extended to at least the end of December 2021. After the Great Recession, some of the largest Medicaid cuts came after an enhanced federal match ended. For instance, in Arizona, some providers saw rate reductions up to 15% over multiple years.

    “There’s that cliff coming when we lose FMAP, and it will be a challenging budget exercise for states to determine how to replace those dollars,” he said.

    Seeking increased equity

    Jon Swiatkowski, CFO at Erie County Medical Center in Buffalo, N.Y., believes policymakers need to create a more equitable reimbursement methodology.

    “The problem is that our most vulnerable community members, our Medicaid patients, are underinsured,” he said. “That has created this two-tiered system where the same care provided to Medicaid patients that is provided to Medicare or commercial patients is paid at a significantly lower rate than Medicare or commercial payers pay.”

    With 38% of its patients on Medicaid, Erie County Medical Center typically operates at or around break-even. “We believe that when you lead with quality, the finances will follow, but it’s been very challenging,” Swiatkowski said.

    In 2020, the 573-bed hospital had to cut its capital budget in half and lay off 70 staff member to help cover Medicaid and COVID-19-related losses.

    Swiatkowski is concerned that future Medicaid rate cuts may mean eliminating needed programs. For instance, Erie County Medical Center is one of the only dental providers for Medicaid enrollees in the area.

    “Further cuts could jeopardize these types of programs both here and nationally, and it will be difficult for us to stand up new services that the community wants, such as a behavioral health intensive outpatient service,” Swiatkowski said.

    Meanwhile, with 43% of its patients on Medicaid, University Medical Center of Southern Nevada, a public academic medical center in Las Vegas, also struggles to cover reimbursement shortfalls.

    “Prior to COVID, we’ve been advocating to have Medicaid rates help cover the true costs of running a hospital,” said CEO Mason Van Houweling, who is also vice chair of the Nevada Hospital Association. “When you look at Medicaid reimbursement in Nevada compared to the cost of delivering care, it only covers about 71% of our costs. So it becomes very difficult when 43% of your business is not fully covered on true costs.”

    Providers’ advocacy work paid off when Nevada issued a 2.5% Medicaid increase for medical-surgical services in December 2019, which raised UMC’s $1,500 per day payment to $1,538.

    But then COVID hit, devastating Nevada’s tourism-dependent economy. The state had a 9.2% unemployment rate in December, second-highest in the country after Hawaii.

    As a result, Nevada instituted a 6% across-the-board Medicaid rate reduction, effective Aug. 15, 2020, reducing UMC’s medical-surgical payment to $1,410 per day. In January, the governor released a proposed two-year budget that reverses the 6% Medicaid cuts; however, at deadline, it is unknown how the final budget will play out.

    “It wouldn’t surprise us if there are more cuts on the horizon as the state is faced with balancing the budget,” Van Houweling said. “We certainly do not envy the job that the state and governor are faced with.”

    ERIE COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER

    Jon Swiatkowski, CFO at Erie County Medical Center in Buffalo, N.Y., said, “The problem is that our most vulnerable community members, our Medicaid patients, are underinsured.”

    Getting creative

    HFMA’s Stack recommends healthcare leaders engage state policymakers about new care approaches, efficiencies, and technologies that are yielding cost savings or healthier outcomes for Medicaid members.

    “State Medicaid agencies are concerned about their patient members and don’t want to cut rates unless they have to,” he said. “The agencies are usually willing to collaborate with hospitals to find creative ways not to cut those rates.”

    Improving health equity for Medicaid patients is another critical topic that providers and states need to discuss. “States are very interested in social determinants of health and looking for ways to connect Medicaid patients to services that impact their health, such as employment or housing,” said Tom Betlach, a partner at Speire Healthcare Strategies. “They are engaging hospital partners to build alignment around that.”

    UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER OF SOUTHERN NEVADA

    University Medical Center of Southern Nevada in Las Vegas struggles to cover Medicaid reimbursement shortfalls with 43% of its patients in the program, said CEO Mason Van Houweling, who is also vice chair of the Nevada Hospital Association.

    Value-based payment

    In addition to discussions with state policymakers, Medicaid providers also need to start conversations with the Medicaid managed-care plans they contract with, Stack said. “Talk about, ‘How can we cut costs? How can we put in value-based initiatives or alternative payment models that focus on quality of care and cost savings? How can we team up to make this work?’ ”

    Almost 70% Medicaid patients in the U.S. are enrolled in managed care. These plans are typically paid a capitated per-member-per-month rate by states. The plans then negotiate payments with providers, typically offering a certain percentage of the Medicaid fee-for-service rates that the state pays providers to care for patients not enrolled in managed care.

    The adoption of risk-based provider payment in Medicaid has been slow. In the federal fiscal 2020, 24 states required Medicaid managed-care plans to have some percentage of provider contracts or enrolled members in alternative payment models. However, most arrangements were pay-for-performance structures to incentivize providers to perform well on quality metrics. The use of risk-based payment models, such as shared losses and capitation, is less common.

    Salo, of the National Association of Medicaid Directors, would like to see states and Medicaid managed-care plans pick up the pace of value-based payment. “The pandemic has shown us the challenges associated with a pure fee-for-service, volume-based system,” he said. “If you were a physician who couldn’t see many patients for six months because of the pandemic, you could be going out of business.”

    But some safety-net hospitals like Erie County Medical Center are not ready to take on care-management risk overnight.

    “Safety-net providers like us don’t have the capital resources or funding to invest in the technology and population health infrastructures to manage patient populations and take on additional risk as quickly as we need to,” Swiatkowski said. “We need the funding and a longer runway.”

    Maggie Van Dyke is a freelance writer based in Brookfield, Ill.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    California hospital pic
    California wants Medicaid to cover 6 months of rent
    NC Medicaid Expansion
    North Carolina Medicaid expansion bill heads to Gov. Cooper
    Most Popular
    1
    More healthcare organizations at risk of credit default, Moody's says
    2
    Centene fills out senior executive team with new president, COO
    3
    SCAN, CareOregon plan to merge into the HealthRight Group
    4
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan unveils big push that lets physicians take on risk, reap rewards
    5
    Bright Health weighs reverse stock split as delisting looms
    Sponsored Content
    Daily Dose Newsletter: Sign up to receive a late afternoon weekday roundup of that day’s breaking news and developments in healthcare.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Digital Health
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Unwell in America
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top 25 Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Data Center
      • Data Center Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Newsletters
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing