Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • ESG: THE IMPLEMENTATION IMPERATIVE
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Digital Health
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Transformation
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Unwell in America
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top 25 Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • Data Center
    • Data Center Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Newsletters
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Legal
December 10, 2019 04:08 PM

Supreme Court may side with insurers on risk-corridor payments

Michael Brady
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    AP

    U.S. Supreme Court justices came down hard on the federal government Tuesday in a case over whether it owes insurers more than $12 billion in Affordable Care Act payments.

    Several of the justices seemed skeptical of the government's argument that it doesn't have to make risk-corridor payments to insurers that provided ACA exchange plans because Congress later decided not to appropriate the funds.

    The government doesn't have an obligation to pay insurers risk-corridor payments because it doesn't have a contract with insurers, and the law doesn't mandate HHS to make the payments, deputy solicitor general Edwin Kneedler argued.

    But Justice Elena Kagain said Congress "induced" payers to participate in the ACA exchanges when it created the risk-corridor program.

    Similarly, other justices took notice of the incentives for insurers.

    "(It was) a good business opportunity for (insurers) because the government promised to pay," Chief Justice John Roberts said.

    Insurers were willing to offer ACA exchange plans to people who had preexisting conditions or were uninsured because Congress promised that the federal government would insure them against outsized financial losses through the risk-corridor program, argued Paul Clement, a partner at Kirkland & Ellis who represented insurers in the appeal.

    "This case involves a massive government bait-and-switch and the fundamental question of whether the government has to keep its word," Clement said.

    Kneedler disagreed, noting that Congress gave the HHS secretary instructions on which funds the agency could use to pay out risk-corridor payments. But the provision didn't mean HHS was obligated to shell out the funds because the legislation is not a contract, he said.

    That argument didn't sit well with some of the justices who thought that insurers had a reasonable expectation that the federal government would provide them with a backstop against financial losses because Congress said in a statute that it would.

    "So why does the government not have to pay its contracts, just like anybody else?" Justice Stephen Breyer said. "They didn't say they wouldn't pay ... end of the case."

    The government was arguing that when Congress promises to pay for something, "they don't really mean it," Breyer said. The justices questioned what Congress was trying to do when it created the risk-corridor program.

    "What policy, constitutional or otherwise, would be served by a rule that says a (government employee) can make the United States pay the money, but the Congress of the United States, House and Senate, signed by the president, cannot ... does not?" Justice Breyer said.

    Some of the justices were also skeptical that Congress intended to overturn the government's obligation to pay insurers when it didn't appropriate the funds because they never repealed the risk-corridor provision of the ACA, even though they had an opportunity. Congress knows how to write a law that is conditional on appropriations and it never said that the risk-corridor payments were conditional, Justices Kagan and Brett Kavanaugh said.

    "So whatever they did, it didn't repeal the ... risk corridors obligation," Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said.

    Another issue at stake was whether the risk-corridor payments were for services to the government or on behalf of people shopping for qualified health plans on the ACA exchanges. Insurers didn't offer policies on the ACA exchanges solely because of the risk-corridor payments, Kneedler said, citing their other business interests including subsidies and market opportunities.

    But Justice Kagan noted that Congress compelled insurers to offer services that were "materially different" from what they would have if the risk-corridor program didn't exist.

    Plus, the payments didn't directly subsidize coverage for people buying exchange-based plans. Insurers had to lose money in order to qualify for risk-corridor payments, Clement said. They didn't get them for merely issuing the policies, so it was an insurance program, not a subsidy, he argued. Payers were pressured into offering plans with lower premiums by Congress' promise to pay, said Justice Kavanaugh.

    "What could be worse than getting an insurance policy and at the point that you actually suffer a loss and try to make a claim (they say they won't pay out)," Clement said.

    Justice Kagan took issue with the government's argument that insurers had to pay into the risk-corridor fund but the government didn't need to reimburse those that lost money selling exchange based plans. The government will only pay out if "we feel like it," she said.

    "What kind of statute is that?" she said.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    PBM3_i.png
    Ohio files price-fixing lawsuit against Express Scripts, Humana, Prime
    outcome-main_1.jpg
    Google investor describes troubling rumors heard before Outcome Health fell
    Most Popular
    1
    More healthcare organizations at risk of credit default, Moody's says
    2
    Centene fills out senior executive team with new president, COO
    3
    SCAN, CareOregon plan to merge into the HealthRight Group
    4
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan unveils big push that lets physicians take on risk, reap rewards
    5
    Bright Health weighs reverse stock split as delisting looms
    Sponsored Content
    Daily Dose Newsletter: Sign up to receive a late afternoon weekday roundup of that day’s breaking news and developments in healthcare.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Digital Health
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Unwell in America
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top 25 Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Data Center
      • Data Center Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Newsletters
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing