A new lawsuit alleges Centene took advantage of enrollee churn between Medicaid and health insurance exchange policies to defraud the federal government and dupe consumers.
The plaintiffs claim the insurer acquired local Medicaid carriers to enroll people into its Ambetter exchange products when they lose eligibility for the low-income health program. Centene then named its exchange policies after the Medicaid plans to mislead members into thinking they were enrolling in coverage with similar benefits, the lawsuit alleges. For example: the insurer named its Florida exchange plan “Ambetter from Sunshine Health” after its Medicaid managed-care insurer, “Sunshine State Health Plan,” the complaint says. Six Centene policy holders represented by Wexler Boley & Elgersma filed the suit in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois Friday.
The company's focus on developing Silver-level Ambetter plans underscored its strategy to capture lower-income people eligible for federal premium subsidies from the marketplaces, the lawsuit alleges. These exchange plans marketed inaccurate provider networks, violated federal network adequacy standards and improperly denied care to patients, according to the lawsuit.
“Because the federal government is paying up to 90% of the premiums for Ambetter plans, the Ambetter enterprise is defrauding the federal government of hundreds of millions—potentially billions—of dollars every year,” the complaint alleges. The plaintiffs want Centene to refund their premiums and a court order halting Centene's allegedly illegal practices.
Centene strongly denied any wrongdoing. “Centene and its local subsidiaries have worked successfully with regulatory partners to help members and their families gain access to comprehensive, affordable and high-quality marketplace health plans. This lawsuit is merely one more attack on the health insurance marketplace and the [Affordable Care Act] itself. Centene will fight this lawsuit vigorously and will continue to uphold the important purpose of the ACA to improve the health of our communities, one person at a time," the company said in a statement.
Download Modern Healthcare’s app to stay informed when industry news breaks.
The plaintiffs allege the insurer’s use of federal resources to falsely market Ambetter plans' benefits and provider networks violates the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act of 1970. The complaint also claims Centene broke 11 states’ laws restricting unjust enrichment, consumer fraud and unfair competition.
By failing to pay for services advertised as covered, and by improperly listing providers as in-network, many patients were unable to get needed care, delayed treatment or were forced to pay out-of-pocket, according to the lawsuit. “The provider networks that are represented on Ambetter plans’ websites are simply false and often are just copies of physician directories from other sources,” the complaint alleges.
The proposed class includes as many as 10 million people who are or were enrolled in an Ambetter plan from August 2018 to the present time, and who reside in Arizona, Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas or Washington, according to a news release from Wexler Boley & Elgersma.
Centene has previously faced legal challenges over its Ambetter operations, including an ongoing lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio in 2019 that alleges the insurer advertised inaccurate provider directories and faced network adequacy issues.