Trick or treaties
TN visas allow for expedited work authorization in the country for Canadian and Mexican citizens per the trade treaty of the USMCA. TN visas are approved for workers in certain categories, usually in relation to whether there is a shortage of that employment category in the U.S.
There are roughly 62 USMCA TN visa categories covering jobs from economists to dentists to hotel managers. Henry Ford uses about eight or nine classifications, said Marc Topoleski, managing attorney at Ellis Porter and HFH’s immigration attorney on the case against the feds.
“The category of scientific technologists or technicians, that’s a category we’ve used for at least 15 years,” Topoleski said. “Nothing has changed in the treaty, nothing about our employees’ jobs duties or jobs have changed. We have no idea why they’ve revoked these visas. After multiple conversations with them (CBP), they are not being helpful. We have no choice but to go to court.”
Not a Modern Healthcare subscriber? Sign up today.
Topoleski is referencing longtime HFH employee, and Canadian, Tibor Hric, who has worked for HFH since 2009, when his first TN visa was approved to work as a radiologic technologist in Detroit.
Hric received his latest TN visa approval on April 15 last year, with status granted through April 30, 2026. However, Hric was denied entry into the U.S. at the Detroit-Windsor Tunnel on May 2, with CBP declaring he had not presented a valid visa. The border agents told Hric that his visa “appears to have been issued in error,” the lawsuit alleges.
A more than month-long back and forth between CBP and HFH’s attorneys resulted in U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services revoking Hric’s visa, alleging that radiologic technologists do not qualify for a TN visa, noting a technologist must work in the fields of agricultural sciences, astronomy, biology, chemistry, engineering, forestry, geology, geophysics, meteorology or physics.
HFH alleges this new interpretation is “wholly inconsistent with (USCIS’) prior interpretation of this requirement, and CBP’s prior interpretation of this requirement, in all six of their previous approvals of Mr. Hric’s applications for TN status with the same employer, and in the same position, since 2009.”
HFH has fought for a return of status for Hric, including arguing radiologists apply under the TN category of medical physics. USCIS most recently denied Hric’s latest petition for a TN visa in late July, denying he works under a physics discipline.
“This new rule by which USCIS is seeking to utilize to adjudicate TN petition had not been published, promulgated, or otherwise made known to TN petitioners previousy,” the lawsuit reads.
In August, USCIS denied the TN visa renewal of Alex Lau, another Canadian HFH radiologic technologist, under the same principle, saying his previous TN visa approvals were an error.
“Due to the actions of defendants USCIS and CBP, plaintiff (HFH) has been unable to continue to employ Mr. Hric and Mr. Lau in the positions they had held since 2009 and 2017, respectively, and their absence has created critical staffing issues that have negatively impacted plaintiff’s ability to deliver patient care,” the lawsuit reads.