Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Blogs
    • AI
    • Deals
    • Layoff Tracker
    • HIMSS 2023
  • Opinion
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - AI and Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
  • Data & Insights
    • Data & Insights Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Insurance
October 09, 2020 12:09 PM

Fewer Medicare Advantage plans score high quality ratings

Shelby Livingston
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    AP

    Fewer Medicare Advantage plans scored high quality ratings for their 2021 plans than the year before, according to the latest federal data.

    Of the 400 Advantage plans with prescription drug coverage that received a rating, roughly 49% earned four stars or higher on a scale of one to five stars, with five being the highest. For 2020 plans, 52% scored four stars or more.

    According to CMS, a smaller percentage of seniors are currently enrolled in plans that will have four stars or more next year. The agency said that weighted by enrollment, 77% of Advantage members are in plans with four stars or higher, compared with 81% for 2020. Those weighted enrollment figures are subject to change as CMS reviews the data.

    The Medicare Advantage star ratings, born out of the Affordable Care Act, are meant to measure the quality of services that seniors receive. CMS says the ratings also reflect seniors' experience with their plans and can be used to help them shop.

    The stars are crucial for health insurers. Plans that score four stars or more receive a 5% increase to their benchmark, which is the maximum amount the federal government will pay, plus other advantages. Those extra dollars can be used to fund extra benefits for seniors, though it's not a requirement. According to the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, the quality bonus payments add about $6 billion to Medicare program expenditures each year.

    Four-star or higher plans are also able to tout their ratings and potentially attract more customers. Fewer plans will have that advantage for 2021. The average star rating across all rated plans weighted by enrollment was 4.06, compared with 4.16 for 2020 plans. About 350 plans weren't rated because they are too new or lacked enough data. CMS said 206 plans received 3.5 stars or less.

    There are a few reasons that plans fared worse overall. Advantage plans are rated on up to 44 quality and performance measures. Some measures have to do with Medicare Advantage Part C and some pertain to Part D prescription drug coverage. There were no new measures for this year, but some of the measures were weighted heavier in the scoring methodology.

    Melissa Smith, a Medicare Advantage stars expert and executive vice president of consulting and professional services at HealthMine, said insurers have struggled to perform well on the Part D measures, which include things like a member's ability to get needed drugs or medication adherence for various chronic conditions.

    Plans also had trouble with health outcomes survey measures and administrative measures, she said. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, CMS eliminated the requirement that plans submit new data for the calculation of those measures and instead used the same data it did to score 2020 plans. For some insurers that was a blessing, but it was a headache for others that invested in improving those measures, Smith said.

    At the same time, CMS jacked up the weight of measures for patient experience, complaints and access. Some plans weren't ready.

    "They didn't realize that rule had already taken effect and they didn't change their stars work plans and investments rapidly enough to cope with that," Smith said.

    Some of the dominant Advantage insurers fared worse. About 72% of UnitedHealthcare's Advantage members are in plans with four stars or higher, compared with 82% the year before, according to an analysis by Evercore ISI analyst Michael Newshel.

    Kent Monical, senior vice president at UnitedHealthcare for stars, quality and performance improvement, said in a statement that the pandemic created challenges but stressed that the insurer's average rating is above four stars and three in four members are in those highly rated plans.

    The analysis also found that 51% of Anthem's Advantage members are in four-star plans or higher, down from 58%. An Anthem spokesman explained that "continued pressure in our pharmacy results negatively impacted our overall 2021 star ratings."

    The company moved its Medicare membership to its newly created in-house pharmacy benefit manager, IngenioRx, in January. An Anthem spokesman said the move enables Anthem "to directly influence and improve our seniors' pharmacy experience and drive better outcomes as we move forward."

    A plan's star rating can affect Medicare Advantage enrollees. A plan that drops beneath four stars will lose its quality bonus payment, which may mean that seniors in the plan will lose some benefits.

    "At the end of the day, it will be the benefits they receive that are diminished when those plans lose quality bonus payments, and that's just an unfortunate reality," Smith said. "There are so many seniors that are loyal to their physicians and their health plan that it will be interesting to see whether those plans that dropped below four stars ultimately lose members."

    Meanwhile, the average star rating for standalone prescription drug plans was 3.58, improved from 3.5 stars the year before. Just 17% of enrollees in prescription drug plans are in contracts with four or more stars. Another 81% are in plans with 3.5 stars or higher.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    Elevance Health
    Elevance, Blue Cross Louisiana halt $2.5B proposed deal
    Sachin Jain ai
    SCAN Group approaching AI cautiously, CEO says
    Most Popular
    1
    CMS tries luring providers to revamped Medicare ACOs
    2
    Oregon joins other states in setting ratios for nurse staffing
    3
    Blue Shield CA taps Amazon, Mark Cuban, CVS for new PBM model
    4
    A health innovation hub grows in Lake Nona Medical City
    5
    Hospital-at-home providers push for Medicaid coverage
    Sponsored Content
    Daily Finance Newsletter: Sign up to receive daily news and data that has a direct impact on the business and financing of healthcare.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Help Center
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Blogs
      • AI
      • Deals
      • Layoff Tracker
      • HIMSS 2023
    • Opinion
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - AI and Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
      • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
    • Data & Insights
      • Data & Insights Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing