“There is an overwhelming amount of vendors,” said Dr. Eve Cunningham, chief of virtual care and digital health at Renton, Washington-based Providence. “The problem is we see a lot of ideas but not a lot of proof that they’ve been able to get people to use [the technology].”
Developing in-house is not without its challenges. Finding and keeping the right AI talent and infrastructure to develop models internally is hard and costly, said Erik Pupo, commercial health information technology advisory director at consulting firm Guidehouse.
“AI requires more of a data science experience, which is very expensive in the market,” Pupo said. “It also requires a lot of actual data and many hospitals do not have that or are able to afford access to large amounts of data.”
Related: How good is AI at diagnosing patients? Better than you’d think
Here is how three health systems are weighing their options.
Providence: Too big to buy many AI solutions
Providence owns 51 hospitals across seven states. Its sheer size means a lot of small, narrowly-focused AI vendors aren't the right fit for the health system, Cunningham said. The company is looking to adopt AI solutions that can address large-scale problems across its various regions while also getting widespread buy-in from clinicians.
The nonprofit Catholic health system's AI governance structure evaluates if the technology addresses a strategic priority, can integrate into its electronic health record system and is built on ethical, unbiased datasets. The process is lengthy and not easy to navigate for a smaller company, Cunningham said.
“Any startup or company that works with us will need to have the right resourcing to be able to handle the size, scope and magnitude, and complexity of what we have inside of our system,” Cunningham said. “But if you solve it in Providence, you can probably solve it for healthcare.”
The system has developed its own AI-enabled tools including MedPearl, an EHR-integrated digital assistant and clinical knowledge platform for primary and urgent care clinicians. MedPearl, which provides subspecialty guidance on more than 700 conditions, is used by nearly 7,000 Providence clinicians, according to research the health system published last Wednesday in the journal NEJM Catalyst.
Providence has developed a home-grown chatbot that answers patient questions, as well, Cunningham said. The system also works with large vendors including Microsoft’s Nuance for its AI scribe solution, which takes recordings of patient-doctor conversations and adds them to the EHR. If Providence adopts AI for imaging analysis, it’s also likely to use a vendor solution since that’s a more mature market, she said.
Ochsner Health searches for AI talent
Ochsner Health employed a data science team long before other health systems jumped on the trend, said chief digital officer Dr. Denise Basow. The New Orleans-based health system has a long history of either building its own models or customizing EHR vendor Epic's models for Ochsner's patient population, she said.
For example, Ochsner created an AI model that predicts who's going to deteriorate in the hospital and may need more intensive care services, Basow said.
Finding talent to develop and customize these models is challenging. The nonprofit health system is thinking differently about pay structures and growth opportunities for employees who work on AI models compared to other roles at the organizations. As Ochsner searched for the right talent, it brought in data scientists outside of healthcare and taught them about the industry, she said.
Like Providence, Ochsner adopted an ambient AI vendor to use across the 46-hospital health system. The company inked a deal with DeepScribe because the vendor was more likely than others to customize its solution by specialty, Basow said.
Hartford HealthCare looks in-house
Hartford HealthCare is an active AI builder, buyer and researcher. The system, which works with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and technology companies such as Google on various innovation ventures, does not want to solely rely on commercial products, said Dr. Barry Stein, the nonprofit health system’s chief clinical innovation officer.
“If you want to be a leader in this space and you're relying only on commercial products that you can buy, you’ll always be, at best, equal to those that have access to all of the same stuff,” Stein said.
Hartford developed and spun out an AI startup called Holistic Hospital Optimization, which helps healthcare providers optimize the flow of patients. In February, the seven-hospital system launched the Center for AI Innovation to conduct AI research, verify applications and educate its clinicians and operational employees.
But the company isn’t afraid to adopt some solutions from vendors and is working with clinical AI research company Medeloop. Hartford has a high threshold when choosing these companies, as many in the marketplace are not proven, Stein said. The company is looking for full transparency on how a vendor’s algorithms are run.
“We treat AI coming to healthcare systems like a new drug where everybody has to understand how it works, what the risks are, how to recognize the risks and how to mitigate the risks,” Stein said.