Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Blogs
    • AI
    • Deals
    • Layoff Tracker
    • HIMSS 2023
  • Opinion
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • 40 Under 40
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - AI and Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
  • Data & Insights
    • Data & Insights Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Government
November 08, 2018 11:00 PM

New VA ban on clinicians' union work spurs litigation threats

Susannah Luthi
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    AP

    Unions representing Veterans Affairs Department medical workers are ramping up for another legal battle over the VA's decision Thursday to bar 430 VA clinicians from doing any union work during their salaried employment hours to ensure a full-time focus on hands-on patient care.

    VA Secretary Robert Wilkie's move overrides a collective bargaining agreement made by the Obama administration and will take effect Nov. 15. It targets agreements made with the American Federation of Government Employees, National Federation of Federal Employees, National Association of Government Employees-SEIU and National Nurses United.

    It will impact VA physicians, dentists, podiatrists, chiropractors, optometrists, registered nurses, physician assistants, and expanded-duty dental auxiliaries who are employed under a specific provision, Title 38 of the U.S. Code for medical employees.

    On Friday, members of the National Nurses Organizing Committee/National Nurses United condemned the move as administrative overreach and vowed to take the Trump administration to court.

    "We'll have to go through a battle of the courts," said Irma Westmoreland, a registered nurse who has worked for the VA for nearly 30 years. Since 2010 she has been full-time on union work, representing nurses at 23 VA facilities across 12 states.

    She said she is one of four registered nurses, out of 11,000 in the region she represents, who work full time on union responsibilities. Most clinicians split up the hours required for union duties, Westmoreland added: some of the 430 people in roles specified by the decision may spend as little as one hour per week on union work.

    She also acknowledged that Congress has granted the VA secretary wide authority, and there aren't arbitration or appeals processes to reverse this kind of decision outside the courts.

    "This shows why the rules that Congress has put in place to assist the VA need to be repealed, because whoever is in the position can make unfettered decisions," she added. "They abuse their power all the time, and you have to be able to prove that they overstep their bounds."

    In this case, she feels the unions can prove this action is an overstep by Wilkie.

    Curt Cashour, a spokesperson for the VA, said that federal law bars the Title 38 medical employees from using official time "when it negatively impacts patient care." He added in an email that "certain matters are precluded from collective bargaining for Title 38 employees, including matters related to direct patient care."

    "As stated in VA's repudiation notices to labor unions, Title 38 employees will no longer be able to utilize official time as doing so negatively impacts direct patient care," Cashour said. "Federal agencies are allowed to repudiate collective bargaining agreements or provisions thereof that conflict with law."

    Thursday's decision and the subsequent outcry follow months of bad blood between the VA and the unions after President Donald Trump issued a May 25 executive order to limit the hours federal workers spend salaried time on union duties to 25%.

    The order, which called out VA employees including 74 nurses, spurred a lawsuit from the American Federation of Federal Employees, filed in the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia.

    Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson in a mixed judgment specifically invalidated that provision of the order.

    "As to the merits of the Unions' contentions, while past precedents and pertinent statutory language indicate that the President has the authority to issue executive orders that carry the force of law with respect to federal labor relations, it is undisputed that no such orders can operate to eviscerate the right to bargain collectively as envisioned in the FSLMRS (Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute)," Jackson wrote in an Aug. 25 decision. "In this Court's view, the challenged provisions of the executive orders at issue have that cumulative effect."

    Cashour said that the latest VA administrative action "had nothing to do with any executive orders."

    Debate over salaried VA medical workers has been ongoing on Capitol Hill. The VA is the only federal department that employs Title 38 medical workers, who were granted collective bargaining rights under the VA Labor Relations Act of 1991. In 2005, they were allowed to start using official time.

    Official time accounts for about $32.5 million in VA salaries as of fiscal 2017, according to data from the Government Accountability Office. This was up from about $22 million in fiscal 2016.

    A breakdown of the GAO data obtained by Modern Healthcare in June showed that the number of medical clinicians who worked official time varied. Boston's VA health system paid three nurses working 100% official time salaries ranging from $115,000 to $138,000, for example.

    Westmoreland said numbers cited by the administration are misleading because they tally up the total number of work hours and accompanying salaries of all VA medical workers who log any official time to show how many federal dollars are being funneled to union work.

    "What they are forgetting to say is that Congress said it was in the interest of taxpayers to have folks on official time, because it keeps us having open lines of communication and helps us settle issues faster," she said.

    She added that no matter whether she is involved in hands-on care or as a nurse representative she is working for the veterans and said medical workers have been unfairly targeted by the move, particularly since many of the VA's nonmedical personnel also work official time on federal salaries.

    "Nurses stand up for the patients, and I need to stand up for the nurses so when they feel they have to whistleblow about a problem, or about patients getting abused, it needs to be reported—they need someone to stand up for them."

    In Congress, Rep. Jodey Arrington (R-Texas) sponsored a bill that would essentially codify into law a stronger version of the official time curbs of the court-invalidated provision of Trump's executive order. With the Democrats taking control of the House in January, it's unlikely the legislation will advance.

    Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) introduced a companion bill in the Senate.

    Current House VA Committee Chair man Phil Roe (R-Tenn.) supports the latest action, a committee aide said.

    "Roe's No. 1 concern is that veterans are receiving the care and support they deserve," the aide added. "It is imperative that taxpayer-funded dollars are not being wasted and that the doctors, nurses, and other medical professionals at the VA are doing the jobs they were hired to do so veterans are able to receive timely and quality care."

    Westmoreland has already made plans to report back for clinical work Nov. 15 at her home VA facility in Augusta, Ga. But as the battle heads to the courts she said she will continue representing the nurses in her region.

    "I will be doing it on my off-time," she said. "I will do it before work, after work, and lunch time."

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    congress prescription drugs
    PBMs, Big Pharma face off in House hearing
    Biden COVID copy_i_i.jpg
    Biden administration asks employers to help more workers who lose Medicaid
    Most Popular
    1
    Centene to lay off 2,000 workers
    2
    How health systems are battling price-gouging allegations
    3
    Senate advances bill to temporarily aid hospitals, health centers
    4
    Elevance, Blue Cross Louisiana halt $2.5B proposed deal
    5
    Tower Health to sell urgent care centers, close others
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare Alert: Sign up for this breaking news email to be kept in the loop as urgent healthcare business news unfolds.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Help Center
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Blogs
      • AI
      • Deals
      • Layoff Tracker
      • HIMSS 2023
    • Opinion
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • 40 Under 40
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - AI and Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
      • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
    • Data & Insights
      • Data & Insights Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing