Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • Data Center
    • Data Center Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Providers
September 19, 2018 01:00 AM

RACs seek to regain reviewing privileges for Medicare claims

Virgil Dickson
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    Recovery audit contractors are hoping a new report on the hundreds of millions they've recovered for Medicare will cause the CMS to reverse course on its decision to limit the number of claims they can review.

    RACs recovered $473.92 million in improper payments in fiscal 2016, according to a report issued Monday by the CMS. That number is up from $440.69 million in fiscal year 2015.

    RACs argue that they could recover more money for the Medicare trust fund if their hands were not tied by the agency. Over the last several years, the CMS has removed their ability to review inpatient status claims, such as whether a patient was on observation status or had a short stay at hospital.

    The agency has also limited the number of documents RACs can request from providers as part of their reviews. Providers with a low history of denial rates are required to turn over less documentation compared to those with known to have higher denial rates.

    CMS made the changes after hospital industry executives raised concerns that RACs are incentivize to deny claims, and that many of their decisions are overturned on appeal.

    "This lack of oversight is taking place at a time when the program is losing approximately $40 billion per year due to preventable billing mistakes," Kristin Walter, spokesperson for the Council for Medicare Integrity, a RAC trade association said in a statement. "The vital billing oversight provided by the RAC program continues to be severely hampered by a [documentation] limit that allows 99.5% of Medicare fee-for-service claims to be paid without review."

    The Council is asking Congress to broaden their ability to review claims before they are paid.

    Dr. Ann Sheehy, division head of the department of medicine at the University of Wisconsin Hospital, said the report issued by the CMS doesn't do RACs any favors and said she is against them taken on additional oversight of hospital claims.

    The report found that the overturn rate for Medicare Part A hospital claims was 37%, up from 22% the prior fiscal year.

    "The problems with the RAC audit process remain," Sheehy said. "Appealing a claim is an enormous amount of work to prove that hospital was right all along."

    The American Hospital association has found that 43% of all hospitals reported spending more than $10,000 managing the RAC process during the third quarter of 2016, 24% spent more than $25,000 and 4% spent over $100,000.

    The report comes as the AHA is seeking to further limit the ability for RACs to review their claims. RACs continue to have the ability to review inpatient hospital claims for compliance reasons such as whether the correct billing code was used.

    Of the overpayments collected in fiscal 2016, 63% or more than $278 million, were for inpatient hospital claims, including coding validation reviews.

    The AHA told a federal court this past summer that hospital claims should be reviewed by quality improvement organizations, or QIOs, instead of RACs. The suggestion was in response to a request made by U.S. District Judge James Boasberg on how the Medicare appeals backlog could be reduced.

    QIOs are the contractors that took over review of the inpatient status claims from RACs. Their staffs include health quality experts, clinicians and consumers. Physicians are often the first to review claims in these organizations and because they're practitioners, are more likely to understand clinical decisions that may have led to the denied claim.

    Hospitals also like QIOs as they are much more transparent in their decision-making when they decide to flag a claim, according to Jessica Gustafson, a founder of the Health Law Partners firm in Farmington Hills, Mich.

    HHS officials have told Boasberg they are against giving QIOs more hospital claims to view. QIOs have oversight of inpatient claims to help educate hospitals about various changes around the two-midnight policy. RACs focus on program integrity and protecting the Medicare trust fund.

    Taking away more claim reviews from RACs will undermine those efforts, according to HHS. RACs recovered $6.2 billion for the Medicare trust funds from fiscal 2011 to 2013. QIOs have recouped $32 million since 2016.

    The difference in recoveries between the two contractors isn't enough of a reason for QIOs to not take on more claims, especially since many RAC denials get overturned added Abby Pendleton, another founder of Health Law Partners.

    "Just because RACs generated more savings, doesn't mean they're valid cost savings," Pendleton said.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    The Check Up: Bobby Sepucha, Interwell Health
    The Check Up: Bobby Sepucha, Interwell Health
    hospital mergers roundtable
    CEOs sound off on mergers, healthcare disruptors
    Most Popular
    1
    More healthcare organizations at risk of credit default, Moody's says
    2
    Centene fills out senior executive team with new president, COO
    3
    SCAN, CareOregon plan to merge into the HealthRight Group
    4
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan unveils big push that lets physicians take on risk, reap rewards
    5
    Bright Health weighs reverse stock split as delisting looms
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare A.M. Newsletter: Sign up to receive a comprehensive weekday morning newsletter designed for busy healthcare executives who need the latest and most important healthcare news and analysis.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Data Center
      • Data Center Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing