Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Login
  • My Account
  • Logout
  • Register For Free
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Blogs
    • AI
    • Deals
    • Layoff Tracker
    • HLTH 2024
    • Sponsored Content: Vital Signs Blog
  • Opinion
    • Letters
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • 40 Under 40
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Innovators Awards
    • Diversity Leaders
    • Leading Women
    • Best in Business Awards
    • The 2030 Playbook Conference
    • Innovations in Patient Experience
    • Leading Women Conference & Awards Luncheon
    • Leadership Summit
    • Workforce Summit
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Diversity Leaders Gala
    • - Looking Ahead to 2025
    • - Financial Growth
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Looking Ahead to 2026
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
  • Data & Insights
    • Data & Insights Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Skilled Nursing Facilities
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
    • Sponsored Content
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Safety & Quality
July 27, 2018 12:00 AM

Just 49% of hospitals follow CMS' sepsis treatment protocols

Maria Castellucci
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    More than half of hospitals on average fail to comply with the CMS' sepsis treatment requirements, new data from the agency reveals.

    The data, publicly released Wednesday on Hospital Compare for the first time, show that the national average compliance rate for the CMS' sepsis treatment measure was 49%. But patient safety experts say the generally low compliance rate for the measure doesn't necessarily mean sepsis treatment is poor at hospitals. The measure is a process measure, so it doesn't directly reflect outcomes for patients with sepsis. Additionally, clinical nuance and trouble reporting the measure must be taken into account when looking at the data.

    The measure—called the Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle—was adopted by the CMS in July 2015 to improve hospitals' identification and treatment of sepsis, a serious and life-threatening condition. More than 200,000 people die each year from sepsis, according to the agency. A study last year also found the mortality rate from the condition has worsened in recent years.

    The measure requires hospitals to follow multiple, time-sensitive steps to comply. Physicians and researchers say that early dedication and intervention is critical to prevent death from sepsis.

    For patients with severe sepsis, the hospital must measure the patient's serum lactate levels, obtain blood cultures and administer antibiotics within three hours after diagnosis. Hospitals must follow the same steps for patients with septic shock plus additional steps within six hours.

    Sepsis has been on hospitals' radar for several years, so the low compliance rate for the measure may point to the elementary nature of its protocols, said Dr. Dave Gaieski, a professor of emergency medicine at Jefferson Health who has studied sepsis treatment.

    Gaieski points to Rhode Island and Delaware as examples. Both states had some of the lowest average compliance rates for the measure but both states have hospitals that have worked hard on interventions to improve sepsis detection and treatment, he said. For instance, Rhode Island Hospital, which is involved in the Surviving Sepsis Campaign, has a compliance rate of 21% out of a sample of 96 patients for the measure. The statewide average is 40%. Sample sizes are used for this measure, especially for hospitals with high volumes, because it must be manually reported by hospital staff to the CMS.

    "It makes me wonder whether there is a disconnect between the reporting and the outcomes," Gaieski said. "You could certainly make the hypothesis that places that got involved in sepsis care earlier would be less compliant with the steps if they felt they didn't have the potential to impact the outcomes."

    Some in the field question if the measure can improve sepsis mortality rates, but there is literature showing it does. A 2016 study found patients at the University of Chicago suffered higher mortality rates when their lactate levels weren't measured in the three-hour time window outlined by the CMS measure.

    Even so, there will always be limitations to full compliance with the measure because clinical judgment and nuance play an important role, said Dr. David Mayer, vice president of quality and safety at Columbia, Md.-based MedStar Health and board member of the Patient Safety Movement.

    If the electronic health record alerts clinicians the patient has signs of sepsis, the team has the power to decide if going forward with prevention treatment is appropriate.

    "Every time you activate that bundle (the CMS measure), the patient may not have sepsis. Sometimes it (sepsis) is obvious, but 25-30% of the time it's a false trigger," Mayer said. "We still want good clinical judgment, and we don't want to be overtreating those who we feel pretty confidently don't have sepsis."

    There is also the issue of proper documentation of the measure. Although MedStar is vigorously keeping tabs on sepsis, there is the potential the measure isn't documented appropriately or in time for the hospital to be considered in compliance. The measure must be manually entered by doctors within three-hour and six-hour windows. Doctors can document too late, so staff who code services are forced to say the measure wasn't used.

    "Many times when we go back in the charts we are compliant with many of these bundles, be it sepsis or ventilator-associated pneumonia, but someone didn't document it correctly or they documented later in the day," Mayer said.

    However, Mayer emphasizes that he isn't following this process measure as much as sepsis mortality. The outcome measure tells him so much more about clinical care and opportunities for improvement.

    "What CMS has done with sepsis has elevated everyone's game and made us all aware of the importance of compliance but I take these numbers with a grain of salt," he said.

    The CMS data set includes performance of 3,005 hospitals for the first nine months of 2017.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    patient nurse grade
    Leapfrog hospital grades improve with help from AI, tech
    Leapfrog grades hospital
    Leapfrog makes updates to annual hospital survey
    Most Popular
    1
    'Legendary' Hemsley takes over at UnitedHealth amid rough seas
    2
    Big retail tried to disrupt healthcare—who is making a dent?
    3
    These are the regulations the AHA wants RFK Jr. to scrap
    4
    Downside risk, upside payment highlight new CMS innovation agenda
    5
    Medicaid cuts bill clears key House committee
    Sponsored Content
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Help Center
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2025. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Blogs
      • AI
      • Deals
      • Layoff Tracker
      • HLTH 2024
      • Sponsored Content: Vital Signs Blog
    • Opinion
      • Letters
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • 40 Under 40
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Innovators Awards
        • Diversity Leaders
        • Leading Women
        • Best in Business Awards
      • Conferences
        • The 2030 Playbook Conference
        • Innovations in Patient Experience
        • Leading Women Conference & Awards Luncheon
        • Leadership Summit
        • Workforce Summit
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Diversity Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Looking Ahead to 2025
        • - Financial Growth
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Looking Ahead to 2026
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
      • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
    • Data & Insights
      • Data & Insights Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Skilled Nursing Facilities
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing
      • Sponsored Content