Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • ESG: THE NEW IMPERATIVE
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • COVID-19
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Transformation
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Digital Health
  • Insights
    • ACA 10 Years After
    • Best Practices
    • Special Reports
    • Innovations
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top 25 Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Supply Chain
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • Data Center
    • Data Center Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • MORE +
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Newsletters
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Finance
June 20, 2018 01:00 AM

Antitrust experts, providers warn against CVS-Aetna merger at Calif. hearing

Shelby Livingston
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    AP

    CVS Health and Aetna executives defended their $69 billion proposed merger before the California insurance commissioner on Tuesday, as a panel of antitrust experts and healthcare providers chipped away at the companies' promise to lower U.S. healthcare costs and improve the quality of care without harming competition.

    Although California Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones doesn't have direct approval authority over the merger because Aetna isn't based in California, his opinion could influence how other state regulators view the deal.

    During Tuesday's hearing, executives from pharmacy chain CVS Health and insurer Aetna rattled off the benefits of their merger, in which Aetna would become a subsidiary within CVS. The deal, which is being scrutinized by the U.S. Justice Department, would allow the companies to create a new model of healthcare where patients could get the information and resources they need to manage their own care at convenient community retail clinics at a lower price, the executives said.

    CVS pharmacists would help fill gaps in care between regular doctor appointments to keep patients healthy and prevent illness, while also referring CVS' Minute Clinic patients to primary care doctors in the area, company officials explained. They would provide personalized counseling to tackle chronic diseases and deploy digital tools to manage care and simplify patients' experience.

    The deal would result in $750 million in cost savings in about two years, largely by getting patients to stick to their medication regimens, said Thomas Moriarty, an executive vice president and general counsel at CVS. Those saving would be passed to consumers through lower premiums and better quality services, he said.

    Nothing in CVS-Aetna plans would harm competition or raise prices in the insurance, PBM or retail pharmacy markets, the companies' executives told Jones.

    "Our acquisition of Aetna does not further concentrate the healthcare sector," Moriarty said. "Instead it reconfigures it to bring together disparate parts of the healthcare system that today lead to inefficient, ineffective and more costly care."

    Antitrust experts and provider organization representatives who testified at the hearing weren't buying it. Dr. Barbara McAneny, president of the American Medical Association and an oncologist in Albuquerque, told Jones that the AMA is recommending that state and federal regulators block the proposed merger after an analysis found it "would substantially lessen competition in many healthcare markets to the detriment of patients."

    The association's analysis concluded the deal would increase premiums for Medicare Part D drug plans and increase drug spending and out-of-pocket costs. Speaking as a physician, McAneny also argued that the merger would make it harder for oncologists to care for patients by increasing the price of already expensive specialty pharmaceutical drugs used to treat complex diseases like cancer, cystic fibrosis and autoimmune diseases.

    CVS' size and dominant position in the specialty pharmacy market allows the company to "effectively force" patients to use a CVS specialty pharmacy, she said. The merger would mean Aetna members would likely be compelled to use a CVS specialty pharmacy instead of going to a hospital or doctor's office to have the drugs administered, which could harm patient safety, she said.

    The proposed deal between CVS and Aetna is described as a vertical merger because the companies provide different services along the supply chain. While federal regulators have blocked proposed horizontal mergers between companies providing the same type of service, including Aetna's proposed merger with Humana, they haven't challenged many vertical mergers in the healthcare industry.

    A wave of hospital-physician mergers that went unchallenged by antitrust enforcers ended up raising healthcare prices for consumers, and that's likely to happen with the CVS-Aetna deal, said Tim Greaney, a professor at University of California Hastings College of the Law and former assistant chief in the Justice Department's antitrust division.

    "Based on what we know right now, I think the CVS-Aetna merger has the potential and is likely to lessen competition in the standalone prescription drug plan market," Greaney said.

    The companies' officials, however, argued that there is little overlap in the Medicare Part D market, and divestitures could address any significant concerns.

    Greaney also said that the CVS-Aetna deal, when viewed alongside another proposed merger between Cigna Corp. and Express Scripts, would give the companies incentive to exclude competitors by cutting them off or raising prices.

    For instance, CVS' PBM now deals with all insurers, but when it merges with Aetna, CVS would have a greater incentive to raise cost for Aetna's competitors or cut them off from PBM services completely, said Diana Moss, president of the American Antitrust Institute. Payers and employers could search for another PBM, but choice is limited in the consolidated market.

    CVS' Moriarty argued it would continue to serve other health plans besides Aetna and Aetna customers would still be able to fill prescriptions at non-CVS pharmacies. He added the company has no plans to change or narrow its network post-merger. Kristen Miranda, Aetna's California market president, likewise said the insurer doesn't plan to change up its provider network as a result of the merger.

    Lawton Burns, a healthcare management professor at the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School of Business, argued that the CVS-Aetna merger has failed to prove any benefits would outweigh its anti-competitive effects. The two companies are merging not to deliver on their lofty promises, he said, but to defend against new competitors like Amazon, which is moving into the pharmacy business, and old competitors like UnitedHealth Group, which has long been an integrated healthcare company with an insurer and a pharmacy benefit manager under one roof.

    Burns said there have been no past vertical mergers that benefited patients.

    Several antitrust experts also warned that the merger between Time Warner and AT&T, which was cleared by a federal judge last week, did not clear the path for all vertical mergers. Many industry analysts had said that blockbuster merger boded well for the CVS-Aetna deal.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    HCA Healthcare sign
    HCA moves forward on capital projects, outpatient expansion despite tough year ahead
    clinicaltrial.JPG
    Venture capital firms launch clinical trial tech company with $203M in funding
    Most Popular
    1
    More healthcare organizations at risk of credit default, Moody's says
    2
    Centene fills out senior executive team with new president, COO
    3
    SCAN, CareOregon plan to merge into the HealthRight Group
    4
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan unveils big push that lets physicians take on risk, reap rewards
    5
    Bright Health weighs reverse stock split as delisting looms
    Sponsored Content
    Daily Finance Newsletter: Sign up to receive daily news and data that has a direct impact on the business and financing of healthcare.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • COVID-19
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Digital Health
    • Insights
      • ACA 10 Years After
      • Best Practices
      • Special Reports
      • Innovations
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top 25 Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Supply Chain
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Data Center
      • Data Center Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • MORE +
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Newsletters
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing