Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • ESG: THE NEW IMPERATIVE
Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • COVID-19
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Transformation
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Digital Health
  • Insights
    • ACA 10 Years After
    • Best Practices
    • Special Reports
    • Innovations
  • Data/Lists
    • Rankings/Lists
    • Interactive Databases
    • Data Points
  • Op-Ed
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Awards
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top 25 Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
    • Women in Healthcare
    • - Luminaries
    • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
    • - Leaders to Watch
    • - Luminaries
    • - Top 25 Women Leaders
    • - Women to Watch
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Custom Media Event: ESG Summit
    • Transformation Summit
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Supply Chain Revenue Cycle
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Strategic Marketing
    • - Virtual Health
  • Listen
    • Podcast - Next Up
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • MORE +
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Newsletters
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Government
November 07, 2017 12:00 AM

CMS overhaul of Medicaid may face legal challenges

Virgil Dickson
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    The CMS will approve requests coming in from various states to impose work requirements on Medicaid enrollees, according to CMS Administrator Seema Verma. While only a handful of states have asked for waivers for the requirement, others could follow.

    "These are individuals who are physically capable of being actively engaged in their communities, whether it be through working, volunteering, going to school or obtaining job training," Verma said at the National Association of Medicaid Directors conference on Tuesday. "Let me be clear to everyone in this room, we will approve proposals that promote community engagement activities." Verma said the agency will adjust its workflow to accommodate those requests.

    The move could drastically change the direction of Medicaid. But experts say the CMS will likely face legal challenges to the waivers if granted.

    Verma's remarks come days after New Hampshire became the latest state to submit its request to impose work requirements in its Medicaid enrollees. Arkansas, Arizona, Indiana, Kentucky, Maine, Utah and Wisconsin also have pending requests waiting for approval.

    Given Verma's past experience as a consultant drafting these types of policies for states like Indiana, it was curious that the agency hadn't already approved the requests. Kentucky has been waiting for over a year for a response.

    Opponents of the work requirement policy say it's a contradiction of the purpose of Medicaid, which was established by Congress in 1965 to provide coverage to low-income people.

    The CMS can only offer waivers in states that want to experiment in Medicaid but continue to ensure coverage for low-income people, said Eliot Fishman, who oversaw 1115 waiver demonstrations for the Obama administration and is now senior director of health policy at Families USA.

    But work requirements could cause as many as 11 million people to lose coverage if every state imposed them, according to a Health Affairs study published earlier this month. Despite giving people with disabilities an exemption from the requirement, many beneficiaries may have physical or mental limitations that prevent them from working, but don't qualify them as disabled.

    "A work requirement is illegal on its face," said Leonardo Cuello, director of health policy for the National Health Law Program.

    The Health Affairs study notes that the waivers do not take into account that some people in active treatment may not technically be disabled, but really can't work.

    "Imagine someone in the middle of cancer treatment being terminated from their health coverage," Cuello said.

    Verma said the Obama administration's opposition to the waivers contradicted its approval of waivers that created voluntary work programs for people with disabilities.

    "For people living with disabilities, the CMS has long believed that meaningful work is essential to their economic self-sufficiency, self-esteem, well-being and improving their health. Why would we not believe that the same is true for working age, able-bodied Medicaid enrollees?" Verma said. "Believing that community engagement requirements do not support or promote the objectives of Medicaid is a tragic example of the soft bigotry of low expectations consistently espoused by the prior administration."

    Verma believes the core objective of the Medicaid program is to serve the health and "well-being" of low-income individuals and families, according to a CMS spokesman. And that requiring able-bodied adults to work meets that standard by improving their quality of life and possibly moving them out of poverty.

    Sara Rosenbaum, a professor health policy at the George Washington University, isn't convinced.

    "How do you focus on a person's 'well-being' without considering healthcare coverage?" she asked.

    Judges hearing any arguments on the work requirements would have to decide not whether work or community engagement is positive or negative, but if those requirements are beyond the scope of the Medicaid program, said Cindy Mann, a former Medicaid director who is now a partner at the law firm of Manatt, Phelps & Phillips

    "The issue is whether it is Medicaid's business to not only promote work but to condition the health coverage Medicaid is designed to provide on work," she said.

    Verma did not indicate how soon the outstanding waiver requests would be approved.

    But she did say the agency would be making changes to the Medicaid waiver process.

    These include:

    • Clear time lines will be provided under which a decision will be made on a waiver request
    • Routine proposals and renewals will get fast-track approval
    • States requesting a waiver that's similar to another state's will also be approved more quickly
    • State waivers can last up to 10 years if they are shown to be successful. That's up from the usually three- to five-year period in place now.
    "This will relieve the burden of states having to come back to the CMS time and time again, increasing administrative costs for taxpayers, and detracting our focus from improving the health outcomes of our beneficiaries," Verma said.

    Mann questioned whether federal law allows 10-year waivers. HHS can not permanently change a law, it only has the authority to approve experiments that maintain the original intent of the law.

    "The question is whether a 10-year waiver approval is no longer an experiment, pilot or demonstration and therefore exceeds … authority," Mann said.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    Ezike 800.jpg
    Former Illinois health chief Ezike under scrutiny by state's top ethics investigator
    AHRQ Director Robert Valdez in front of American flag
    Q&A: AHRQ chief aims to help communities improve their health systems
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare Alert: Sign up for this breaking news email to be kept in the loop as urgent healthcare business news unfolds.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2022. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • COVID-19
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Digital Health
    • Insights
      • ACA 10 Years After
      • Best Practices
      • Special Reports
      • Innovations
    • Data/Lists
      • Rankings/Lists
      • Interactive Databases
      • Data Points
    • Op-Ed
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Awards
      • Nominate/Eligibility
      • 100 Most Influential People
      • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
      • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
      • Excellence in Governance
      • Health Care Hall of Fame
      • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
      • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
      • Top 25 Innovators
      • Diversity in Healthcare
        • - Luminaries
        • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
        • - Leaders to Watch
      • Women in Healthcare
        • - Luminaries
        • - Top 25 Women Leaders
        • - Women to Watch
    • Events
      • Conferences
        • Transformation Summit
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Leadership Symposium
      • Galas
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Supply Chain Revenue Cycle
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Strategic Marketing
        • - Virtual Health
      • Webinars
      • Custom Media Event: ESG Summit
    • Listen
      • Podcast - Next Up
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • MORE +
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Newsletters
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing