Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Blogs
    • AI
    • Deals
    • Layoff Tracker
    • HIMSS 2023
  • Opinion
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • 40 Under 40
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - AI and Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
  • Data & Insights
    • Data & Insights Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Government
August 28, 2017 12:00 AM

Experts: States can adjust to lower CHIP match if they have time to prepare

Mara Lee
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    Keeping the enhanced match that was added to CHIP as part of the Affordable Care Act is unlikely to be the sticking point for a bipartisan deal, a senior House Republican aide said.

    The enhanced match of 23 percentage points, which means the federal government pays the full cost of the Children's Health Insurance Program in 12 states, was passed as part of the Affordable Care Act, and is scheduled to expire Oct. 1, 2019.

    While Republicans don't like the enhanced match—which means 12 states have no cost-sharing for CHIP—they recognize states need time to adjust.

    Dr. Michael Burgess, chairman of the Health Subcommittee in the House of Representatives, noted at a hearing in June that Texas has already passed a biennial budget, which means even changing funding in fiscal 2019 could hurt the state. About 40% of states have biennial budget processes.

    "Any changes we make now would have a significant effect on the state budget that has already been passed and I believe signed into law. Is that correct?" Burgess asked witness Jami Snyder, associate Medicaid commissioner in Texas, his home state. "Exactly, an $800 million impact over the biennium," she replied.

    A senior Republican aide in the House said he doesn't expect the enhanced match to be a sticking point in the bipartisan discussions, because Republicans recognize it would be "a significant disruption if you change funding midstream on a biennial (state) budget."

    Republicans on the House Health Subcommittee explored how much it would cost to do a two-year reauthorization at that level, as well as keeping the enhanced match in the coming fiscal year, scaling it back to 11 percentage points in fiscal 2019, and returning to traditional funding levels for 2020 through 2022. The short-term reauthorization actually needs more pay-fors than a five-year plan with a ramp down.

    While the Congressional Budget Office baseline assumes the federal government will continue to spend $5.7 billion a year on the Children's Health Insurance Program, this year's spending is estimated at $14.5 billion, to cover about 6.3 million children at any given time, and 8.9 million across the course of a year.

    Kelly Whitener, an associate professor at the Georgetown University Center for Children and Families, said states would prefer a five-year reauthorization, even if there is lower federal funding after the first or second fiscal year. States sign contracts with managed-care companies for two or three years, she said, so they need more certainty than a two-year extension.

    Even though the House of Representatives has just 12 legislative days in September, Whitener believes it's still possible the reauthorization bill could be passed by the Sept. 30 deadline.

    "If the Senate Finance hearing goes well, that will be a really good sign for swift action," she said. That hearing is expected in the first week of September. "What I will be looking for to see is if there's bipartisan engagement on needing to do CHIP, not just from (Chairman Orrin) Hatch and (Ranking Member Ron) Wyden. If a lot of members show up and actually talk about CHIP and wanting to do it, that sends a really clear message to (Minority Leader Chuck) Schumer and (Majority Leader Mitch) McConnell."

    But, she added, "If they can do something, a short term patch, that's better than nothing. If they can actually get it done in September that's the best."

    Sara Rosenbaum, a former chairwoman of the Medicaid and CHIP Payment and Access Commission and law professor at George Washington University, said: "The common rumor is that it's going to take the fall to make these decisions, and also the [federally qualified] health center fund that travels on the same pathway. I think everybody's been told not to expect final legislation by the end of September."

    "I think everyone wants to get CHIP [reauthorization] done in a timely manner," a senior House Republican aide said. Conversations between Democrats and Republicans about added revenue or cuts to offset the spending over the $5.7 billion annual threshold have been productive, he said.

    Maureen Hensley-Quinn, senior program director at the National Academy for State Health Policy, said her group surveyed 39 CHIP directors around the country in July, and 36 said their states' budgets assumed the enhanced match would continue through Sept. 30, 2019. Three have contingency funds, but Hensley-Quinn said the states are offered anonymity for participating in the survey, so she couldn't say which ones.

    "They'd absolutely prefer a longer time period of federal funds, even if that meant their enhanced federal match would ramp down, over just a two-year extension at the enhanced match level," she said.

    The Congressional Budget Office says that returning to historical CHIP funding rates will not result in fewer children being insured.

    Whitener said that's probably broadly true, though there were about 17,000 immigrant children in Florida who gained coverage because that state lifted its five-year waiting policy for CHIP because of the additional funding.

    Would states cut rates to providers when they have to come up with more money to cover CHIP? "It would really vary. For the most part states are trying not to cut provider rates. They are recognizing they need to keep rates where they are or even increase them," Whitener said. But, she added: "If you're a state with a budget crisis, you only have so many places to go to generate savings."

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    congress prescription drugs
    PBMs, Big Pharma face off in House hearing
    Biden COVID copy_i_i.jpg
    Biden administration asks employers to help more workers who lose Medicaid
    Most Popular
    1
    Centene to lay off 2,000 workers
    2
    How health systems are battling price-gouging allegations
    3
    Senate advances bill to temporarily aid hospitals, health centers
    4
    Elevance, Blue Cross Louisiana halt $2.5B proposed deal
    5
    Tower Health to sell urgent care centers, close others
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare Alert: Sign up for this breaking news email to be kept in the loop as urgent healthcare business news unfolds.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Help Center
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Blogs
      • AI
      • Deals
      • Layoff Tracker
      • HIMSS 2023
    • Opinion
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • 40 Under 40
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - AI and Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
      • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
    • Data & Insights
      • Data & Insights Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing