Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Blogs
    • AI
    • Deals
    • Layoff Tracker
    • HIMSS 2023
  • Opinion
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - AI and Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
  • Data & Insights
    • Data & Insights Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Opinion
June 15, 2017 12:00 AM

Are GOP's proposed Medicaid cuts paltry? Not if you have to look a patient in the eye

Harris Meyer
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Getty Images/iStockphoto
    \

    The congressional Republican proposal to establish a budget cap on federal Medicaid spending has raised alarms among healthcare industry leaders, state policymakers and patient advocacy groups.

    The American Medical Association came out firmly against Medicaid spending caps Tuesday, with one AMA board member calling the GOP proposal "disastrous for patients."

    But last week, prominent conservative health policy expert Dr. Avik Roy downplayed the impact of the per capita limits on Medicaid spending contained in the House Republican bill to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act and likely to be included in the Senate repeal bill.

    That may be a sign that supporters of the Republican repeal-and-replace drive are nervous about the growing political backlash to cutting Medicaid.

    Roy, the opinion editor at Forbes, argued in a column that the growth cap would result in a "paltry" $107 billion, or 1.6%, cut from 2017 to 2026 in Medicaid's pre-ACA federal spending.

    In making his case, he took a shot at a recent Modern Healthcare article about Medicaid managed-care insurers fearing financial losses under the bill's spending limit. That provision would cap the annual growth of federal payments to each state at the medical component of the Consumer Price Index for most beneficiaries, and at M-CPI plus 1 for the elderly and disabled. Payments would be based on each state's spending for fiscal 2016.

    "I expect margin compression as states claw back rates in Medicaid to offset the funding pressure from the rollback in Medicaid funding and a move to per capita caps," said Leerink Partners analyst Ana Gupte.

    Roy wrote that "the numbers these alarmists are using are factually wrong. Indeed, the per capita cap in the American Health Care Act may not end up saving any money."

    That's hard to square with recent analyses of the House bill done by the CMS' Office of the Actuary and the Congressional Budget Office.

    On Tuesday, CMS Actuary Paul Spitalnic projected that the House bill's per capita cap would reduce federal Medicaid spending by $64.9 billion over 10 years, out of a total of $383.2 billion in Medicaid cuts. Federal payments under the per capita caps would be about 0.5 percentage points per year lower than under current law.

    While the CBO did not break out the dollar impact of the per capita cap, it projected that under the cap formula Medicaid payments to the states for most beneficiaries would lag behind actual Medicaid per capita costs by 0.7 percentage points—3.7% versus 4.4%. The CBO estimated the House bill's Medicaid provisions overall would reduce federal Medicaid spending by $834 billion over 10 years, or about 25%.

    Meanwhile, Senate conservatives are pushing to peg per capita growth to the CPI, which the CBO projects will be 2.4%; that would reduce federal Medicaid spending much more steeply.

    Experts say the House Republicans' proposed Medicaid growth cuts might look relatively innocuous at first, but that would change.

    "By its very nature, a per capita cap tends to generate small cuts initially that get steadily larger over time," said Matt Fiedler, a budget expert at the Brookings Institution's Center for Health Policy, commenting on Roy's argument. "It's perfectly reasonable to be very concerned about a per capita cap even if the near-term budgetary impacts are small relative to the other very large Medicaid cuts included in the AHCA."

    "States simply do not have the resources to make up even a small cut in federal support, and this is not a small cut," said Vernon Smith, a senior adviser at Health Management Associates who formerly served as Michigan's Medicaid director and budget director under Republican Gov. John Engler.

    As the federal cap started to bite, states would have to boost their own Medicaid spending by 30% to 40% to maintain current benefits and payment rates, and "I cannot fathom that happening," he said. Barring that, states would have to slash eligibility, benefits and payment rates.

    That scenario is giving state policymakers—including Republican governors such as Nevada's Brian Sandoval, Michigan's Rick Snyder and Ohio's John Kasich—nightmares. They and other governors and state lawmakers have signaled their opposition to the GOP's proposed Medicaid caps and rollbacks.

    Smith said that while he respects Roy's Medicaid reform views, he sees the program differently based on his many years as a Medicaid and budget official. "Perhaps Mr. Roy hasn't had face-to-face discussions with people with disabilities who, with tears in their eyes, describe how budget-driven program restrictions threaten the care they depend on to live," Smith said.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    Bernie Sanders 23
    Senate panel advances bill limiting hospital facility fees
    GettyImages-654573744.jpg
    Biden administration to ban medical debt from credit scores
    Most Popular
    1
    CMS tries luring providers to revamped Medicare ACOs
    2
    Oregon joins other states in setting ratios for nurse staffing
    3
    Blue Shield CA taps Amazon, Mark Cuban, CVS for new PBM model
    4
    A health innovation hub grows in Lake Nona Medical City
    5
    Hospital-at-home providers push for Medicaid coverage
    Sponsored Content
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Help Center
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Blogs
      • AI
      • Deals
      • Layoff Tracker
      • HIMSS 2023
    • Opinion
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - AI and Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
      • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
    • Data & Insights
      • Data & Insights Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing