Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • Data Center
    • Data Center Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Government
June 06, 2017 01:00 AM

GOP health plan could doom Medicaid managed care

Virgil Dickson
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    Unless it's significantly revamped by the Senate, the House Republicans' bill capping federal Medicaid payments to the states could put Medicaid managed-care plans out of business.

    The American Health Care Act, passed by the House in early May, would convert Medicaid from an open-ended entitlement to a system of per capita or block grant payments to the states. The growth of those payments would be kept below projected increases in actual Medicaid costs.

    The bill also would phase out enhanced federal payments to the states for the ACA's expansion of Medicaid to low-income adults. In total, it would reduce federal Medicaid spending by a projected $834 billion over 10 years, according to the Congressional Budget Office.

    But the House bill, which Senate Republicans currently are revising, isn't all bad news for Medicaid plans, because plans might see their enrollment increase, at least in states that didn't end their Medicaid expansion programs, experts said.

    "States are going to look for what gives them budget predictability, and that's what managed care does," said Joe Moser, who served until recently as Indiana's Medicaid director and led the implementation of the state's Healthy Indiana 2.0 program. "You will see more states expanding their managed-care populations to more difficult populations."

    Currently, more than 50 million people, or about 73% of Medicaid beneficiaries, are covered through Medicaid managed care, according to research firm PwC. Disabled people and those in need of long-term care and support largely remain outside of managed care.

    But states could curb costs by shifting those populations to managed care as federal funds shrink, said Ari Gottlieb, a healthcare industry analyst with PwC, also known as PricewaterhouseCoopers. "A per capita cap could accelerate the trend of managed care," he said.

    Nevertheless, the current fixed-payment formula congressional Republicans are proposing to use puts plans at risk. Insurers say the proposed formula would not provide adequate resources if there's an unexpected economic downturn, if major new public health needs develop, or if expensive new prescription drugs or other treatments emerge.

    The House GOP bill would use fiscal 2016 as a baseline for each state's per-capita spending on five beneficiary groups—the elderly, blind and disabled people; children; adult expansion beneficiaries; and adult non-expansion beneficiaries.

    Payments would increase annually at the rate of the medical component of the Consumer Price Index, except for the aged, blind and disabled, for whom it would rise at medical CPI plus 1 percentage point.

    In federal fiscal 2016, total Medicaid spending reached $548 billion, with nearly half of all spending flowing through Medicaid managed-care plans. Managed-care spending hit $269 billion in 2016, up from $238 billion in 2015, according to the consulting firm Health Management Associates.

    Locking the baseline at 2016 increases the odds that states will cut payment rates to managed-care plans if enrollment and/or medical costs rise, according to Leerink Partners analyst Ana Gupte.

    Nationally, Medicaid plans' operating margins average average around 2%.

    "I expect margin compression as states claw back rates in Medicaid to offset the funding pressure from the rollback in Medicaid funding and a move to per capita caps," Gupte said.

    To ensure the financial viability of Medicaid plans under a per capita cap system, insurers hope Senate Republicans will revise the House bill's framework for federal Medicaid payments to the states.

    "The concept of a per capita cap is fine," said John Lovelace, president of Medicaid, Children's Health Insurance Program and Medicare Advantage plans at UPMC in Pennsylvania. "It's a devil in the details conversation."

    Insurers want Senate Republicans to revise the funding formula so that the baseline year for calculating the capped federal payments to the states changes at least every two years.

    Insurers also want the Senate to include a provision that would require states to continue following federal actuarial soundness rules in setting payment rates to Medicaid plans.

    Current federal rules require that rates paid to Medicaid plans cover all of the plans' medical costs, administrative costs, taxes and fees.

    Without this protection, and if the House bill passes with no changes, the consequences could be dire for insurers, said Meg Murray, CEO of the Association for Community-Affiliated Plans, which represents safety net plans. Her group has strongly criticized the House bill's Medicaid provisions and other aspects.

    "What we're worried about is that plans wouldn't be able to survive," Murray said. "It could end up fundamentally undermining the (Medicaid) managed-care system and all the good things that have occurred because of it."

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    abortion-pill-misoprostol-legal
    Abortion pill case advances to appeals court, on course to Supreme Court
    young doctor medical resident
    Federal physician recruitment program at risk
    Most Popular
    1
    More healthcare organizations at risk of credit default, Moody's says
    2
    Centene fills out senior executive team with new president, COO
    3
    SCAN, CareOregon plan to merge into the HealthRight Group
    4
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan unveils big push that lets physicians take on risk, reap rewards
    5
    Bright Health weighs reverse stock split as delisting looms
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare Alert: Sign up for this breaking news email to be kept in the loop as urgent healthcare business news unfolds.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Data Center
      • Data Center Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing