Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • ESG: THE NEW IMPERATIVE
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • COVID-19
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Transformation
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Digital Health
  • Insights
    • ACA 10 Years After
    • Best Practices
    • Special Reports
    • Innovations
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top 25 Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Supply Chain
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • Data Center
    • Data Center Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • MORE +
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Newsletters
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Safety & Quality
January 28, 2017 12:00 AM

The next frontier in quality care measurement: How patients feel

Elizabeth Whitman
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    GETTY IMAGES

    When patients visit Dr. Judy Baumhauer in hopes of getting rid of bunions—a painful, bony bump that develops at the base of the big toe—they often have just one question: Will surgery help?

    The answer varies from patient to patient, said Baumhauer, an orthopedic surgeon at the University of Rochester (N.Y.) Medical Center. A highly useful tool for determining the most effective treatment is a patient survey from Promis, or Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, composed of questions about the patient's quality of life and ability to function.

    “I listen to their concerns about their bunion, we look at X-rays together, and then we look at their Promis scores,” said Baumhauer, who has researched the tool extensively and sits on the board of directors for the Promis Health Organization. If the Promis results show a patient is functioning well, then surgery is unlikely to help. That knowledge allows her to confidently tell a patient that nonsurgical treatment is the best option.

    Physicians, policymakers and payers in healthcare are increasingly asking patients for their input. This information is viewed as vital for clinicians, payers and health systems as the industry transitions from fee-for-service to value-based payment. By shaping clinical decisions and helping gauge the benefit of medical care, the patient's perception of health before and after treatment is critical not only for maximizing the quality of care but also for assessing its value, many in the industry say.

    But the science and technical infrastructure to capture this information and incorporate it into payment programs fall short of the eagerness and optimism for using them. At this frontier of quality measurement, important questions remain over how these metrics can be implemented, what burden they'll impose on physicians and patients, and how they'll be used to determine payment.

    The National Institutes of Health said this past October it would pour $6.3 million into an initiative to integrate these tools into electronic health record systems, including those by Epic Systems Corp. and Cerner Corp. Patient-reported outcomes measures are not readily compatible with these systems, a technological challenge that frustrates many.

    “It's a very, very active space,” said Helen Burstin, chief scientific officer for the National Quality Forum, the Washington, D.C.-based body that reviews and endorses quality measures using a consensus-based process. “The real challenge is thinking about how that data starts to get used in clinical practice.”

    In December, the NQF held its annual meetings of clinicians, hospital leaders and others to discuss performance measures under consideration by the CMS for use in the coming fiscal year. From those meetings emerged “an incredible amount of excitement about how this seems so much more important and relevant—to have the voice of the patient being measured,” Burstin said.

    MH TAKEAWAYS

    Performance measures based on patient-reported outcomes could be invaluable in gauging whether medical care actually made life better for patients, but the field is not yet mature enough to drive value-based payments.

    Patient-reported outcome measures are tools, such as surveys, that capture patient responses. They can then be incorporated into performance measures to judge a hospital or physician's quality of care and may increasingly be tied to reimbursement.

    The growing attention to these tools is driven by a sense that measures of processes and clinical outcomes, which dominate the healthcare quality landscape, are delivering an incomplete picture.

    If a patient has a knee replacement and suffers no medical complications, the operation is a success from a clinical outcome perspective. But if the patient does not regain the mobility that was the point of the procedure, can the operation still be considered successful?

    The principle behind using patient-reported outcomes is straightforward, but putting it into action is far more challenging.

    A patient with congestive heart failure and suffering from shortness of breath might see a doctor in the hopes of eliminating that symptom, but with some patients, the problem will never go away completely, even if they receive excellent care, said Dr. Janis Orlowski, chief healthcare officer of the Association of American Medical Colleges. Other patients' shortness of breath may diminish even if they receive poor care. The challenge for patient-reported outcome measures is to accurately gauge the relationship between outcomes and quality of care, she said.

    The subjectivity of a patient's experience presents a different challenge. As a physician, Orlowski has seen patients who do well clinically but complain bitterly. She has seen other patients, extremely ill, who say they're fine. “How do you look at patients' personalities and their response to how well they're doing?” she asked.

    Although many experts describe the field of patient-reported outcome measures as robust, it is stronger in some specialties—such as in orthopedic surgery, cancer and depression—than in others. Assessing overall health, especially when patients have multiple chronic conditions, remains difficult.

    But these challenges are not stopping measure developers.

    Since 2015, the number of patient-reported outcome performance measures endorsed by the National Quality Forum has nearly doubled to 122. These measures often examine quality-of-life questions, such as “average change in functional status following total knee replacement surgery.” That measure uses a survey called the Oxford Knee Score to compare knee function before the operation and approximately one year after. It asks patients questions such as, “Have you had any trouble washing and drying yourself (all over) because of your knee?” and “Could you walk down a flight of stairs?”

    “Many of the functional outcomes are subjective. There's going to be some variation,” said Burstin, of the National Quality Forum. “It's important to test these measures to make sure that they really are capturing what they're intended to measure.”

    Resources and tools for measuring patient-reported outcomes have accumulated in recent years. But they still don't readily translate into ways to measure performance for reimbursement, which some argue is the real catalyst for quality improvement.

    “The science is actually very good for a lot of the patient-reported outcome measures,” said Eugene Nelson, director of the population health measurement program at the Dartmouth Institute. But although many think they should be used in value-based payment, “for the most part, there's more interest in that area than there is action,” he said.

    Here's a sampling of questions about mobility that a patient might be asked before and after treatment

    They would answer on a scale of 1 to 5, with 1 meaning "unable to do" and 5 indicating "without any difficulty." This survey is for upper extremity function.

    Are you able to dress yourself, including tying shoelaces and buttoning your clothes?

    Are you able to reach into a high cupboard?

    Are you able to use a hammer and pound a nail?

    Are you able to cut your food using eating utensils?

    Are you able to open a can with a hand can opener?

    Are you able to pull heavy objects (10 pounds/5kg) towards yourself?

    Are you able to wash your back?

    Are you able to put on a shirt or blouse?

    Are you able to peel fruit?

    Are you able to hold a plate of food?

    Are you able to trim your fingernails?

    SOURCE: Promis, via healthmeasures.net

    Promis, which Baumhauer uses with her patients, is an open-source, NIH-funded bank of adult and pediatric measures for assessing physical, mental and social health. They are available in several languages.

    The University of Rochester Medical Center is at the vanguard of using patient-reported outcome measures to transform care and is in the process of expanding the use of Promis beyond its orthopedics department and across the entire institution.

    When patients come in to see the doctor, they are given the survey, which is optional, to fill out at registration. It's done on an iPad and is supposed to take a maximum of five minutes. About 80% of patients opt in, according to Baumhauer. The information is then imported into the patient's EHR—the health system plans to integrate it within the year—and can be viewed on a screen in the exam room with the doctor.

    Baumhauer said that both doctors and patients like the survey. It's purely elective, yet 500 doctors so far have opted to use it, and patients love seeing their personal data. The goal is to reach 1,200 providers by the end of the year.

    “It's been a ridiculously positive adventure for us,” Baumhauer said.

    However, the health system is not close to paying providers based on their performance on these measures. “I really think the first bar is collecting the data and deciding how it could be best used,” Baumhauer said. “Only once we understand what that data are telling us can we start to apply it for quality purposes. The external assessment and reimbursement is another ballgame.”

    During the Obama administration the CMS laid the groundwork for these kinds of measures to play an expanding role in its initiatives that penalize or reward physicians and hospitals based on performance.

    The agency's plan for developing quality measures, part of the 2015 Medicare and CHIP Reauthorization Act, or MACRA, that affects how physicians will be paid, highlighted “gaps in the availability of outcome measures, including patient-reported outcome measures, for specialties.”

    “MACRA prioritizes outcome measures, including patient-reported outcomes and measures of patient perception, as well as measurable clinical outcomes,” the CMS said in the plan.

    Medicare's Comprehensive Joint Replacement bundled-payment program, which pays providers a set amount for all the care associated with total hip or knee replacements, offers incentives to providers for simply reporting patient-reported outcomes, without tying payments to performance. It's gathering those data in order to test a hospital-level performance measure still under development “for future use in the CJR model,” according to the CMS.

    Collecting accurate and useful data is a slow process. It takes even longer for that scrutiny to translate to changes on a hospital or clinical level, as demonstrated by the history of one now-commonplace survey of patient experience.

    In 2002, the CMS began developing the questionnaire CAHPS, or Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems, in partnership with the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. In 2006, it began collecting data from hospitals through a standardized version, the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems, or HCAHPS, which asks patients about cleanliness, pain management, communication with nurses and doctors and other aspects of their experience.

    In 2007, the CMS began requiring hospitals to collect and submit HCAHPS data. If they didn't report, Medicare would dock as much as 2% of its annual payments, but at the time, those payments were not affected by how hospitals actually performed on those surveys. A year later, the CMS began publishing that information, still without linking it to payments.

    It “wasn't that earth-shattering,” said Dr. Martha Radford, chief quality officer at NYU Langone Medical Center in New York City. It wasn't until 2013, when Medicare started to factor HCAHPS performance into the Hospital Value-based Purchasing program, that accounting for patient experience spurred major changes at the hospital.

    “Now we have a pretty big department around patient experience, which we didn't have before,” Radford said. “What that does in the end, in a trickle-down effect, is the hospitals—our hospital included—devote resources to improving patient experience,” she said of tying payments to hospitals' performance on these patient surveys.

    Although patient-reported information is seen as valuable, many obstacles remain in figuring out how to capture and use patient-reported clinical outcomes in the same way patient experiences have been. Said Nelson of the Dartmouth Institute, “It's more an idea whose time is coming for value-based payment than whose time has come.”

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    Nursing Home covid
    AHCA sounds alarm on nursing home staffing crisis
    Collage of images, medication pills, elderly man in hospital, bacteria, and triangle caution symbol
    High adverse event rate paints ‘serious’ picture of inpatient harm
    Most Popular
    1
    More healthcare organizations at risk of credit default, Moody's says
    2
    Centene fills out senior executive team with new president, COO
    3
    SCAN, CareOregon plan to merge into the HealthRight Group
    4
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan unveils big push that lets physicians take on risk, reap rewards
    5
    Bright Health weighs reverse stock split as delisting looms
    Sponsored Content
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • COVID-19
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Digital Health
    • Insights
      • ACA 10 Years After
      • Best Practices
      • Special Reports
      • Innovations
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top 25 Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Supply Chain
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Data Center
      • Data Center Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • MORE +
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Newsletters
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing