Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • ESG: THE NEW IMPERATIVE
Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • COVID-19
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Transformation
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Digital Health
  • Insights
    • ACA 10 Years After
    • Best Practices
    • Special Reports
    • Innovations
  • Data/Lists
    • Rankings/Lists
    • Interactive Databases
    • Data Points
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Awards
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top 25 Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
    • Women in Healthcare
    • - Luminaries
    • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
    • - Leaders to Watch
    • - Luminaries
    • - Top 25 Women Leaders
    • - Women to Watch
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Custom Media Event: ESG Summit
    • Transformation Summit
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Supply Chain Revenue Cycle
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Strategic Marketing
    • - Virtual Health
  • Listen
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • MORE +
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Newsletters
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Providers
December 22, 2016 12:00 AM

HHS finds social risk factors affect patient outcomes and provider performance

Elizabeth Whitman
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    HHS quietly released a report to Congress Wednesday on the controversial topic of social risk factors in value-based payment programs, acknowledging that patients with certain risk factors fare worse on many quality measures, and that their providers perform worse, too.

    The report—the first of two reports the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation is required to publish under the 2014 Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation Act— examined nine Medicare payment programs, including the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program and the Medicare Shared Savings Program.

    It found that Medicare beneficiaries with social risk factors fared worse on process, clinical outcome and patient experience measures. The most powerful predictor of poor performance was dual eligibility status--which describes people who qualify for both Medicare and Medicaid because they are some combination of disabled, elderly and low-income.

    The report also found that providers who disproportionately served patients with social risk factors tended to perform worse on quality measures, including in all five CMS programs that levy penalties on hospitals.

    The subject of social risk factors, such as income, race and ethnicity and geography, is controversial. As providers like hospitals and physicians increasingly are rewarded and penalized based on value of the care they provide, they do not want to be punished for factors beyond their control.

    HHS has set a goal of tying 90% of traditional Medicare dollars to quality and efficiency performance by 2018. By that year, Medicare spending is projected to be $574 billion.

    As the report explains, if patients have poor health outcomes because they receive poor care, value-based payments can drive improvements. But if they have worse health outcomes because of social risk factors, also referred to as social determinants of health, “value-based payment models could do just the opposite.”

    Risk adjustment has sparked much debate in discussions of Medicare's quality incentive programs. Providers and their advocates are clamoring for patients' socioeconomic status to be factored into performance results, warning that without such adjustments, providers that are penalized for taking on sicker, poorer patients might refuse to see such patients.

    “We must guard carefully against any value-based purchasing arrangements that would lead some providers to decide against serving those individuals with social risk factors,” wrote Dr. Patrick Conway, CMS acting principal deputy administrator and chief medical officer, and Kathryn Martin, the acting assistant secretary for planning and evaluation at HHS, in a blog post Wednesday.

    In the past, the CMS has been wary of adjusting for socioeconomic factors, arguing that such handicaps would lead to a two-tiered health system that allows lower-quality healthcare for certain patients.

    But Congress recently forced the agency's hand on its hospital readmissions reduction program. The 21st Century Cures Act called for stratifying hospitals by the socioeconomic status of patients, as measured by their proportion of dual eligible patients, to allow apples-to-apples comparisons of hospitals under the program.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    Beyond the Byline: Roe v. Wade ruling compromises patient safety
    Beyond the Byline: Roe v. Wade ruling compromises patient safety
    Dr. Alex Jahangir
    Q&A with Dr. Alex Jahangir of Vanderbilt Medical Center: 'It really was a big private-public partnership'
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare A.M. Newsletter: Sign up to receive a comprehensive weekday morning newsletter designed for busy healthcare executives who need the latest and most important healthcare news and analysis.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2022. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • COVID-19
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Digital Health
    • Insights
      • ACA 10 Years After
      • Best Practices
      • Special Reports
      • Innovations
    • Data/Lists
      • Rankings/Lists
      • Interactive Databases
      • Data Points
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Awards
      • Nominate/Eligibility
      • 100 Most Influential People
      • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
      • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
      • Excellence in Governance
      • Health Care Hall of Fame
      • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
      • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
      • Top 25 Innovators
      • Diversity in Healthcare
        • - Luminaries
        • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
        • - Leaders to Watch
      • Women in Healthcare
        • - Luminaries
        • - Top 25 Women Leaders
        • - Women to Watch
    • Events
      • Conferences
        • Transformation Summit
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Leadership Symposium
      • Galas
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Supply Chain Revenue Cycle
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Strategic Marketing
        • - Virtual Health
      • Webinars
      • Custom Media Event: ESG Summit
    • Listen
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • MORE +
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Newsletters
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing