Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • ESG: THE NEW IMPERATIVE
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • COVID-19
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Transformation
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Digital Health
  • Insights
    • ACA 10 Years After
    • Best Practices
    • Special Reports
    • Innovations
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top 25 Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Supply Chain
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • Data Center
    • Data Center Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • MORE +
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Newsletters
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Government
December 10, 2016 12:00 AM

Back to abstinence-only education for teens?

Steven Ross Johnson
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Milwaukee's successful campaign to reduce teen pregnancies focused on collaboration among the city's health department, healthcare providers, schools and community groups.

    In 2008, the United Way of Greater Milwaukee & Waukesha County launched an initiative to lower Milwaukee's high rate of teen childbirths.

    That year, more than 5% of Milwaukee teens between 15 and 17 gave birth—double the national average. The campaign involved building communitywide awareness through the Milwaukee Health Department, local businesses, healthcare providers, schools and community groups. The goal was to cut the rate of teen pregnancies in half by 2015.

    Related Content

    More pregnancy stats: Data Points

    The centerpiece of the campaign was an eight-hour, evidence-based, sex education curriculum aimed at middle-school youth called “Making Proud Choices! A Safer Sex Approach to STDs, Teen Pregnancy, and HIV.” By increasing teen knowledge, Milwaukee lowered its teen pregnancy rate for six straight years. By 2012, it stood at 2.6%, nearly achieving its goal three years early.

    “We know that we have to give young people information to help empower them to make healthier decisions,” said Nicole Angresano, who has led the United Way's teen pregnancy prevention effort for the past nine years. “We think it was a significant contributor to the reduction in rates.”

    Proud Choices is one of more than 40 teen pregnancy prevention programs endorsed by HHS' Office of Adolescent Health as part of its Teen Pregnancy Prevention Initiative (TPPI). The Obama administration program provided grants to agencies and organizations to implement programs with demonstrated effectiveness as well as develop new strategies that educate youth on sex-related issues.

    MH Takeaways

    The U.S. teen pregnancy rate, which has been falling for decades, fell sharply after the Obama administration supported broad reproductive health education in its Teen Pregnancy Prevention Initiative. Advocates fear that progress may reverse should federal policy shift back to abstinence-only education.

    Whether those deserve all the credit—some argue the culture is shifting away from early sexual activity among teens—the fact is between 2007 and 2015 the rate of teen births fell 50% in urban counties and 37% in rural counties, according to a recent study from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Indeed, rates of both teen pregnancy and childbirth have fallen every year since 1991, with only a brief two-year rise between 2005 and 2007.

    Critics who supported the abstinence-only sex education approach taken by federal policymakers during the 1990s and 2000s argue the Obama administration programs have been ineffective at best and may have even promoted an increase in sexual activity among teens. But public health advocates are convinced evidence-based, medically accurate sex education programs provided teens with the resources needed to make informed decisions when it comes to sex and contributed to lowering the teen pregnancy rate.

    A 2015 National Family Growth Survey conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention showed a 14% decline over the past quarter-century in female teenagers and a 22% drop among male teenagers age 15-19 who reported having sex. The study also found an increase in the number of teen girls who reported using condoms during sex from 94% in 2002 to 97% in 2013.

    A change in sex ed policy

    The Obama administration's sex education policies represented a major break from the abstinence-only approach, which had been federal policy for decades. Abstinence-only programs received $1.5 billion in federal funding over the past quarter- century, according to the Sexuality Information and Education Council of the United States.

    The Obama administration initially invested $110 million in a more comprehensive approach, which grew to $180 million this year. “We have moved toward focusing on the results and not the content,” said Andrea Kane, vice president for policy and strategic partnerships with the National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unwanted Pregnancy.

    With the arrival of a Trump administration in January, however, advocates of evidence-based programs fear policy will shift back to the old approach and set back progress in reducing teen pregnancy rates. “The federal investments since 2010 have really moved from being focused on a particular type of sex education that's based on a certain ideology to evidence-based programs,” Kane said.

    Even some public health officials in conservative parts of the country are worried about cuts to the programs. “Every little bit we do certainly is cost-effective because lives are forever changed when a woman has a child sooner than they are ready,” said Dr. Bob England, director of the Maricopa County Public Health Department in Arizona, where the state's teen birth rate fell 57% between 2007 and 2015.

    Studies have found babies born to teen mothers are more likely to be premature and have low birth weights, which carries a higher risk of infant mortality as well as physical and mental disorders. Only 40% of teen mothers earn a high school diploma, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures, with two-thirds of teen mothers living in poverty and a quarter dependent on public assistance within three years after giving birth.

    TPPI program supporters hope the data will convince the new administration to maintain the programs. “We're hoping … we can make the connection that, yes, these evidence-based program initiatives really make a difference,” said Lauren Killelea, director of development and communications with the Massachusetts Alliance on Teen Pregnancy.

    Videos in the AMAZE program aim to "take the awkward out of sex ed." The program was launched by the groups Answer, Advocates for Youth and Youth Tech Health.

    Providers bracing for cuts

    Yet many providers are bracing for cuts. They say GOP-led legislatures are likely to shift the focus of teen pregnancy-prevention to abstinence-only sex education. “Certainly when we've had Republicans in the White House and Republican-controlled houses of Congress there's been more support for abstinence-only programs,” said Nicole Cushman, executive director for Answer, a national organization that trains teachers and other professionals to provide sex education for youth.

    GOP majorities in the House and Senate routinely proposed funding cuts to programs that provide contraception and screening for HIV and sexually transmitted diseases. Only a threatened veto from President Obama saved the programs. More than 4 million low-income and uninsured individuals received services under the programs during the Obama years.

    It is still unclear where the Trump administration will take the issue. According to the New York Times, the president-elect plans to delegate responsibility for reproductive health issues to Vice President-elect Mike Pence, the conservative governor of Indiana.

    Last March Pence signed an anti-abortion law in Indiana that makes it a criminal act to seek an abortion based on the fetus being diagnosed with a genetic disorder. Pence has also sought to defund Planned Parenthood, which resulted in the closing of a number of clinics in the state and the loss of preventive health services such as access to contraception for low-income individuals.

    “The same lawmakers that tend to support restrictions on reproductive rights and access to abortion also have tended to favor abstinence-only programs and to oppose more comprehensive approaches to sex education,” Cushman said.

    Indeed, that's exactly what advocates for abstinence-only education expect from the new administration. “We are hoping that the Trump administration gives the sexual risk-avoidance approach, also known as abstinence education, a stronger acceptance in both the policy and the funding levels than the past administration has offered,” said Mary Anne Mosack, national director of state initiatives for Ascend, formerly known as the National Abstinence Education Association.

    Mosack said the launch of Obama's TPPI effectively ended more than two decades of bipartisan support for sexual risk-avoidance education. There were 169 such programs prior to 2010, she said.

    Of course, no one knows what impact returning to that approach will have on teen pregnancy rates. England in Arizona believes greater awareness of the unfavorable economics of teen pregnancy and a culture shift away from early childbearing had a greater impact on reducing the rate of teen childbirths than reproductive health education.

    “What will happen if these programs get defunded is we will have a large national experiment, and we'll see what the impact was,” England said.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    Hospital systems finance 3
    Mississippi lawmakers consider easing restrictions on public hospitals
    Biden COVID_i.jpg
    Biden to end COVID emergency declarations on May 11
    Most Popular
    1
    More healthcare organizations at risk of credit default, Moody's says
    2
    Centene fills out senior executive team with new president, COO
    3
    SCAN, CareOregon plan to merge into the HealthRight Group
    4
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan unveils big push that lets physicians take on risk, reap rewards
    5
    Bright Health weighs reverse stock split as delisting looms
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare Alert: Sign up for this breaking news email to be kept in the loop as urgent healthcare business news unfolds.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • COVID-19
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Digital Health
    • Insights
      • ACA 10 Years After
      • Best Practices
      • Special Reports
      • Innovations
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top 25 Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Supply Chain
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Data Center
      • Data Center Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • MORE +
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Newsletters
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing