Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Blogs
    • AI
    • Deals
    • Layoff Tracker
    • HIMSS 2023
  • Opinion
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - AI and Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
  • Data & Insights
    • Data & Insights Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Government
August 27, 2016 12:00 AM

What scrubbing Social Security numbers from Medicare cards means for data handlers

Joseph Conn
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Getty Images
    Some health IT experts wonder if the CMS is wasting time and money creating yet another payer-specific identifier.

    The CMS is getting to work on replacing Social Security numbers as identifiers for 150 million Medicare recipients, both living and dead.

    By the end of 2019 the agency intends to use randomly generated identifiers instead of the health insurance claim number, composed of a Social Security number plus one or two letters. The proposed new ID will have seven numeric and four alphabetical characters.

    This is happening because Congress, in the 2015 Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act, gave the CMS four years to issue cards to Medicare beneficiaries that don't have Social Security numbers printed on them. The provision is intended to make seniors less vulnerable to identity theft. Some industry stakeholders, however, are already griping that the way the Obama administration is carrying out the mandate will further stratify the flow of healthcare data.

    The planned conversion requires reprogramming 75 complex legacy information technology systems that the CMS and its contractors use to process Medicare claims, according to the agency. It would also mean updating hundreds of thousands of private-sector computers that handle healthcare claims. The users will include hospitals, physician practices, claims clearinghouses, billing companies, post-acute providers and Medicare Advantage carriers.

    A CMS spokesman said the agency would solicit input from the industry “at various points throughout the project to ensure a smooth transition that maintains beneficiaries' access to care while avoiding disruptions to the payment process.”

    Finding the right approach to matching patients to their health information has been controversial for decades. Twenty years ago, Congress called for the creation of a national patient identifier—to be used by all payers, not only Medicare—in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.

    But the Clinton administration blocked federal spending on the initiative because of privacy concerns, and Congress then passed a similar ban that still stands.

    MH Takeaways

    Congress told Medicare to stop putting Social Security numbers on beneficiary cards. But some industry experts question whether it's wise to go through the trouble to replace them with a new Medicare-specific ID.

    Some health IT experts wonder if the CMS is wasting time and money creating yet another payer-specific identifier. The MACRA mandate is for Medicare to scrub Social Security numbers from beneficiaries' cards, not necessarily to generate a new ID.

    “We have identifiers in the DoD (Department of Defense), the VA (Veterans Health Administration) and insurance companies,” said Russell Branzell, CEO of the College of Healthcare Information Management Executives, a professional association for hospital and health system CIOs. “We have identifiers everywhere.”

    Branzell called the Medicare proposal “one more great example of the fractionalizing of our identification system.”

    By April 1, 2018, all organizations that pro-cess Medicare claims must have their IT systems modified to send or accept the new IDs, according to the government's timeline.

    The CMS will assign the new identifiers to nearly 60 million active Medicare beneficiaries and to 90 million former beneficiaries who are deceased and have had their records archived. The agency plans to use both the old and new ID numbers during a transition period that would end in December 2019.

    “Part of this is for security reasons, privacy reasons, and that's a good idea,” said Stanley Nachimson, a health IT consultant in Baltimore. “Unfortunately, it's a big deal for not only CMS, but all of the providers and insurance companies.”

    The proposed timeline is adequate, Nachimson said, although he noted the conversion will come as physicians adopt new technology to meet MACRA's quality reporting requirements. The biggest challenge for healthcare providers won't be reprogramming computers but rather getting everyone to use the new IDs, he said. “This is a big information and education project as well as a technical project.”

    CHIME, meanwhile, is in the homestretch of a contest the organization sponsored to solicit the best way to identify patients and electronically match them to their records. The solution may not involve an ID at all. It could be a matter of finding a sufficiently reliable algorithm based on multiple bits of personal information, such as names, birthdates and addresses.

    But Dr. Charles Jaffe, CEO of Health Level Seven, a standards development organization specializing in healthcare IT, remains optimistic that the government and the industry will embrace a true national identifier.

    “We have a changing Congress and a changing notion as to what people are entitled to,” Jaffe said. “I think health is an entitlement that we all expect and we can't get it without health information exchange—and the absence of an identifier is a barrier to that exchange.”

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    congress prescription drugs
    PBMs, Big Pharma face off in House hearing
    Biden COVID copy_i_i.jpg
    Biden administration asks employers to help more workers who lose Medicaid
    Most Popular
    1
    Centene to lay off 2,000 workers
    2
    How health systems are battling price-gouging allegations
    3
    Senate advances bill to temporarily aid hospitals, health centers
    4
    Elevance, Blue Cross Louisiana halt $2.5B proposed deal
    5
    Tower Health to sell urgent care centers, close others
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare Alert: Sign up for this breaking news email to be kept in the loop as urgent healthcare business news unfolds.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Help Center
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Blogs
      • AI
      • Deals
      • Layoff Tracker
      • HIMSS 2023
    • Opinion
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - AI and Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
      • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
    • Data & Insights
      • Data & Insights Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing