Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Blogs
    • AI
    • Deals
    • Layoff Tracker
    • HIMSS 2023
  • Opinion
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • 40 Under 40
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - AI and Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
  • Data & Insights
    • Data & Insights Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Government
August 09, 2016 12:00 AM

Essure court ruling in California could bring more lawsuits

Elizabeth Whitman
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    A California state court has cleared the path for nearly a dozen lawsuits to proceed that alleged that pharmaceutical company Bayer's permanent birth control device, Essure, seriously injured patients. The ruling could have major implications for device manufacturers who, like Bayer, argue that federal regulation of their products means they shouldn't be accountable for injuries.

    Bayer sought to have the cases thrown out on three separate grounds, but on each of them, Judge Winifred Y. Smith of the Superior Court in Alameda County sided with the plaintiffs. The rulings, filed Aug. 2, not only mean that Bayer could still be held liable for the harm alleged in current lawsuits, but they also help lay the groundwork for future lawsuits over Essure.

    “I'm hoping the the tide has turned a little bit and that the courts are now starting to understand the gravity of the situation,” said Elizabeth Graham, a lawyer for Grant & Eisenhofer, one of the firms representing the plaintiffs.

    Read all of Modern Healthcare's coverage of the safety concerns about Essure>

    The 11 consolidated suits greenlighted last week represent 14 women who say that Essure, a permanent birth control device consisting of tiny metal coils inserted into the fallopian tubes, injured them in ways well beyond the risks indicated in medical literature.

    They represent a fraction of the some 200 lawsuits that have been filed in California alone, Graham said. Other cases have been filed outside the state in federal court, and lawyers filed a petition before the judicial council Friday to coordinate cases in California, so they can be assigned a single judge in the hopes that rulings would be applicable to all those cases.

    In one of its defenses, Bayer argued that under federal preemption law, the plaintiffs were not allowed to file suit. Because Essure was approved by the Food and Drug Administration, it said, Bayer itself should not be held liable for injuries.

    But the court disagreed, in a motion that not only was vital in allowing the Essure cases to forward but could also have major implications for other medical device manufacturers, lawyers said.

    “It's a court telling Bayer and other similar manufacturers that they don't have immunity,” said Fidelma Fitzpatrick, an attorney with Motley Rice, which also represented plaintiffs in the cases affected by last week's ruling. “They don't have the ability to go out and injure without consequence.”

    In response to the court's rulings, Bayer cited the FDA in maintaining that Essure is both safe and effective for “the majority of women” who want permanent birth control. About 900,000 women use Essure today, a figure based on sales, it said.

    The device consists of a tiny coil, made of nickel, that is inserted into each fallopian tube. As scar tissue builds around the coils, it is supposed to block the tubes and prevents eggs from being fertilized or entering the uterus. The device's straightforward insertion, done quickly and without surgery or anesthesia, is part of its appeal.

    However, thousands of women have reported problems with the device such as its moving after insertion, perforating organs or causing severe pain. Essure Problems, a Facebook support group for women who have suffered after getting it implanted, has more than 12,000 likes.

    “We will vigorously defend against the remaining claims and stand behind the continued availability of this important option for the many women who are seeking permanent contraception,” a spokesperson for Bayer said.

    The cases move forward amid swelling controversy over the safety and efficacy of Essure that has enmeshed the FDA, physicians, thousands of patients, their advocates and one of the biggest pharmaceutical companies in the world, while raising broader questions about how the FDA approves medical devices.

    The FDA approved Essure as a Class III medical device in 2002. Thirteen years later, its Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience database had racked up more than 5,000 adverse event reports, from abnormal bleeding to “device migration," linked to Essure.

    In September 2015, the FDA convened a panel of independent experts who recommended the agency limit the use of Essure because too little research had been done to prove its safety. In February, it recommended a black box warning for Essure, amid calls for it to recall the device entirely.

    In the California suits, specific allegations against Bayer vary by case, but among them are negligence, fraud and negligent misrepresentation. Bayer failed, the plaintiffs claimed, across a wide spectrum, by failing to monitor and test Essure, conduct regular risk analysis, or exercise “reasonable care in its manufacturing and quality control process.” Nor did it “appropriately certify and train physicians” to prescribe and implant the device, on complaint said, according to court documents.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    congress prescription drugs
    PBMs, Big Pharma face off in House hearing
    Biden COVID copy_i_i.jpg
    Biden administration asks employers to help more workers who lose Medicaid
    Most Popular
    1
    Centene to lay off 2,000 workers
    2
    How health systems are battling price-gouging allegations
    3
    Senate advances bill to temporarily aid hospitals, health centers
    4
    Elevance, Blue Cross Louisiana halt $2.5B proposed deal
    5
    Tower Health to sell urgent care centers, close others
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare Alert: Sign up for this breaking news email to be kept in the loop as urgent healthcare business news unfolds.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Help Center
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Blogs
      • AI
      • Deals
      • Layoff Tracker
      • HIMSS 2023
    • Opinion
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • 40 Under 40
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - AI and Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
      • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
    • Data & Insights
      • Data & Insights Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing