Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Blogs
    • AI
    • Deals
    • Layoff Tracker
    • HIMSS 2023
  • Opinion
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • 40 Under 40
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - AI and Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
  • Data & Insights
    • Data & Insights Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Government
July 22, 2016 12:00 AM

Blog: You thought Obamacare was a big deal? Take a look at the GOP's proposed Medicare overhaul

Harris Meyer
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    In its 2016 platform released this week, the Republican Party took a political risk by embracing House Speaker Paul Ryan's longstanding proposal to convert the highly popular Medicare program from a defined-benefit system into a defined-contribution, “premium support” model. It's not surprising that the proposal wasn't mentioned by Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump at the GOP national convention, since he repeatedly has promised during the campaign that he wouldn't touch Medicare.

    But as the Kaiser Family Foundation points out in a valuable new policy brief, the premium support model's impact on healthcare providers, beneficiaries, insurers and the federal budget would heavily depend on the details. Those details are lacking in the most recent GOP proposals.

    The priority goals of the elected officials who would create it—whether it's federal cost savings, better meeting beneficiaries' needs, or privatizing a public program—matter a lot, because those goals would drive the all-important design features.

    The task would be enormously complicated, and the ramifications could be more far-reaching than the changes made by the Affordable Care Act. “Turning Medicare into a premium support system would be a significant transformation of the Medicare program and have implications for many parts of the health care system,” the brief concludes.

    Depending on the details, federal spending could decline or grow, it notes. Beneficiary premiums and out-of-pocket costs could rise or fall. Private plans could thrive or shrivel. Provider payments could go up or down. The public Medicare program could grow more dominant or fall into an actuarial death spiral. And these outcomes could vary sharply by local market.

    “These policy specifications have important implications for federal savings, beneficiaries' costs, the viability of private plans in markets across the country, and the sustainability of traditional Medicare,” the authors wrote.

    The Medicare premium support model was developed in the 1990s as a proposed solution to the program's rising costs. It originally had some support from Democratic policy thinkers, though that has largely evaporated. Ryan has included different versions of Medicare premium support in a series of House Republican budgets. His latest version would let Americans 55 and older stay in the existing program and apply the changes only to younger people when they reach Medicare eligibility age, which Ryan wants to increase to 67.

    Drawing on the recent health policy white paper from Ryan and other House Republican leaders, the GOP platform (PDF) proposes to give Americans under 55 an “income-adjusted contribution toward a plan of their choice, with catastrophic protection,” which people could apply either to traditional Medicare or the new privatized program. This would strengthen patient choice, promote cost-saving competition among providers, and guard against fraud and abuse, the platform says.

    But Democrats and many senior advocates worry that the Republicans' defined-contribution approach is a thinly disguised move to slowly strangle traditional Medicare. They cite comments like those of former House Speaker Newt Gingrich in 1995 that Republicans weren't trying to get rid of Medicare all at once "because we don't think that that's politically smart," but rather were trying to cause the government-administered part of the program to "wither on the vine.”

    Here's one of the many ways that the details—and the overarching goals—matter a lot. A central feature of premium support proposals is to base the federal per-beneficiary contribution to both private plans and the traditional Medicare program on competitive bidding. But a key question is whether the payments are based on the average bid in a given geographic area or the second lowest plan bid. According to the Congressional Budget Office, beneficiaries' premiums and out-of-pocket costs would decrease if payments are tied to the average bid, but would increase if payments are tied to the second-lowest bid. Either way, however, most beneficiaries who choose to remain in traditional Medicare would pay higher premiums than they do under the current system.

    Another key issue is setting the rules for benefit design. Under the current system, all beneficiaries are entitled to the same set of benefits, whether in traditional Medicare or private Medicare Advantage plans. If private plans are allowed to offer benefits that are merely “actuarially equivalent” to the traditional program, they could set their cost-sharing and benefits to attract healthier, lower-cost enrollees. That could lead to serious risk-selection problems, with plans serving sicker members either having to cut benefits or raise premiums.

    If traditional Medicare had to compete with private plans, how would that change the way the public program pays providers? Would it have to establish limited networks rather than allowing patients to see any participating provider? Would benefits and premiums vary by local area? What would happen to Medicare's value-based payment demonstrations and Medicare payments to teaching hospitals, rural hospitals, and those serving disproportionately poor and uninsured populations?

    Finally, if people 55 and older are grandfathered into the existing program, wouldn't there be logistical difficulties and extra administrative costs involved in running two separate programs for grandfathered beneficiaries and newer beneficiaries – including two public programs and two private-plan programs – with different rules for each?

    Beyond these daunting design issues, even if Trump wins the November election and Republicans keep control of Congress, they will have an uphill fight winning public support for this proposal. According to a mid-2015 Kaiser Family Foundation survey, 70% of people support keeping Medicare as it is today, with only 26% supporting a shift to premium support, with those percentages similar among Democrats and Republicans. Just 18% of seniors supported turning Medicare into a premium support program.

    To gain support, Republicans may have to change their public messaging and emphasize the premium support model's similarity to the popular Medicare Advantage program. “I strongly advised Ryan's people to stop using those words premium support, and just say they want to liberalize and expand Medicare Advantage,” said John Goodman, a veteran Republican health policy strategist. “Instead they are using new words no one has heard of and it sounds scary. I think they could have been a little better about marketing that proposal.”

    But, as the Kaiser Foundation policy brief shows, marketing the premium support plan is just the beginning of their challenges.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    congress prescription drugs
    PBMs, Big Pharma face off in House hearing
    Biden COVID copy_i_i.jpg
    Biden administration asks employers to help more workers who lose Medicaid
    Most Popular
    1
    Centene to lay off 2,000 workers
    2
    How health systems are battling price-gouging allegations
    3
    Senate advances bill to temporarily aid hospitals, health centers
    4
    Elevance, Blue Cross Louisiana halt $2.5B proposed deal
    5
    Tower Health to sell urgent care centers, close others
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare Alert: Sign up for this breaking news email to be kept in the loop as urgent healthcare business news unfolds.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Help Center
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Blogs
      • AI
      • Deals
      • Layoff Tracker
      • HIMSS 2023
    • Opinion
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • 40 Under 40
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - AI and Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
      • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
    • Data & Insights
      • Data & Insights Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing