Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Blogs
    • AI
    • Deals
    • Layoff Tracker
    • HIMSS 2023
  • Opinion
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - AI and Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
  • Data & Insights
    • Data & Insights Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Government
April 07, 2016 12:00 AM

MedPAC outlines post-acute pay overhaul, backs Part D changes

Virgil Dickson
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission has completed work on a road map for overhauling how the program pays for post-acute care. The advisory panel voted to back a variety of changes to the Part D prescription drug program that could save as much as $10 billion over five years.

    The post-acute proposal, to be included in the commission's June report to Congress, would change the way Medicare reimburses skilled-nursing facilities, home health agencies, inpatient rehabilitation facilities and long-term-care hospitals. It would establish rates according to specific patient conditions instead of the kind of specific care setting.

    Congress directed MedPAC to develop a plan to pay these providers under one prospective payment system.

    HHS would have until 2022 to develop an actual payment prototype, and MedPAC would need to weigh in on it by 2023.

    Kathy Buto, a commissioner and independent health policy consultant in Arlington, Va., during a MedPAC meeting on Thursday called the report “a thoughtful road map.”

    A provider in the room immediately expressed concern. It's unclear what impact the model will have on patients' out-of-pocket costs, since copays now vary depending on the post-acute-care setting, said Dr. John Votto, CEO of Hospital for Special Care, a private not-for-profit rehabilitation long-term acute and chronic-care hospital in Connecticut.

    In 2013, about 42% of Medicare beneficiaries discharged from an inpatient hospital went to a post-acute-care facility: 20% to a skilled-nursing facility, 17% to a home health agency, 4% to an inpatient rehabilitation facility and 1% to a long-term-care hospital. Post-acute-care spending has more than doubled since 2001, from $27 billion to $59 billion in 2013.

    MedPAC commissioners also unanimously passed a package of nine recommendations related to Part D. If implemented, the package of proposals could save Medicare as much as $2 billion in one year, and as much as $10 billion in in five years, according to a Congressional Budget Office assessment.

    Perhaps the most controversial of MedPAC's suggestions was to limit which drugs would be a part of the protected class of Medicare Part D.

    Under the policy, a Part D plan is required to cover all or substantially all drugs in six therapeutic classes: antiretrovirals, immunosuppressants when used to prevent organ rejection, antidepressants, antipsychotics, anticonvulsant agents and antineoplastics.

    MedPAC suggested removing from the list antidepressants and immunosuppressants used to prevent transplant rejection. The commission argued that the move would save money without affecting medication access by switching patients to generic options. But the exact amount saved and the potential number of people who would be impacted were unknown.

    Jack Hoadley, a Georgetown University health policy analyst, said he thought beneficiaries wouldn't be harmed by the proposal because there are numerous generic offerings for both drug types.

    Providers and advocates, however, were furious. “Without protected class status, there is no other guarantee under Medicare that would ensure patient access to all immunosuppressive drugs,” Dr. Matthew Cooper, transplant surgeon and board member of the National Kidney Foundation, said in a statement. “In order to find the right combination for individual patients, physicians must have the full-range of approved immunosuppressive drugs at their disposal.”

    Joe Baker, president of the Medicare Rights Center, said in a statement that the advocacy organization is “deeply concerned that the proposed formulary flexibilities, specifically the changes to the protected classes, could limit beneficiary access to needed medications.”

    The CMS has tried twice to make this change through rule-making—once in 2012 and again in 2014. Stakeholders thwarted both efforts, arguing the change would deny patients their medications. Members of both parties in Congress also slammed the idea.

    Another controversial recommendation would reduce the reinsurance subsidy for Part D plans from 80% to 20%, while increasing what plans are paid upfront.

    By law, Medicare Part D subsidizes 74.5% of the expected cost of basic drug benefits, with enrollees paying the remainder through premiums. The subsidy is composed of two components: direct monthly subsidy payments and expected individual reinsurance payments to plans.

    MedPAC said the change would force plans to more diligently track their spending.

    Last month, Dr. Craig Samitt, a MedPAC commissioner and chief clinical officer at Anthem, said he was worried about how the proposal would affect smaller plans. On Thursday, even though he ultimately supported the proposal, he said he still had reservations.

    “One of the weaknesses of the recommendation is that we haven't studied the impact on plan sponsors,” Samitt said.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    congress prescription drugs
    PBMs, Big Pharma face off in House hearing
    Biden COVID copy_i_i.jpg
    Biden administration asks employers to help more workers who lose Medicaid
    Most Popular
    1
    CMS tries luring providers to revamped Medicare ACOs
    2
    Oregon joins other states in setting ratios for nurse staffing
    3
    Blue Shield CA taps Amazon, Mark Cuban, CVS for new PBM model
    4
    A health innovation hub grows in Lake Nona Medical City
    5
    Hospital-at-home providers push for Medicaid coverage
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare Alert: Sign up for this breaking news email to be kept in the loop as urgent healthcare business news unfolds.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Help Center
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Blogs
      • AI
      • Deals
      • Layoff Tracker
      • HIMSS 2023
    • Opinion
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - AI and Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
      • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
    • Data & Insights
      • Data & Insights Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing