Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • ESG: THE NEW IMPERATIVE
Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • COVID-19
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Transformation
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Digital Health
  • Insights
    • ACA 10 Years After
    • Best Practices
    • Special Reports
    • Innovations
  • Data/Lists
    • Rankings/Lists
    • Interactive Databases
    • Data Points
  • Op-Ed
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Awards
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top 25 Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
    • Women in Healthcare
    • - Luminaries
    • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
    • - Leaders to Watch
    • - Luminaries
    • - Top 25 Women Leaders
    • - Women to Watch
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Custom Media Event: ESG Summit
    • Transformation Summit
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Supply Chain Revenue Cycle
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Strategic Marketing
    • - Virtual Health
  • Listen
    • Podcast - Next Up
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • MORE +
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Newsletters
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Government
March 01, 2016 12:00 AM

Supreme Court sides with insurer, against Vermont in data-sharing case

Lisa Schencker
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    (This story was updated at 3:40 p.m. ET.)

    In a win for insurers and a loss for states trying to collect data for healthcare reform efforts, the U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday decided 6-2 that a federal law protects a self-funded insurer from having to share certain information with the state of Vermont.

    A Vermont official, however, expressed optimism after the ruling Tuesday that the state may still be able to work with other states to press the federal government for a solution.

    The court ruled in Gobeille v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. (PDF) that a federal law takes precedence over a Vermont state law, shielding the self-funded insurer and its third-party administrator from having to share the data with the state.

    Vermont argued (PDF) it needed certain data from Liberty, such as on claims, member eligibility and other issues, to help it improve the cost and effectiveness of healthcare. Liberty Mutual, however, argued that the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act, known as ERISA, protected it and its third-party administrator from having to turn over the information.

    The Supreme Court on Tuesday upheld a lower court's ruling that ERISA does take precedence over state law.

    Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote in the court's majority opinion that Vermont's law “imposes duties that are inconsistent with the central design of ERISA, which is to provide a single uniform national scheme for the administration of ERISA plans without interference from laws of the several states.”

    The decision is a “great victory” for insurers, said Steve Wojcik, vice president for public policy with the National Business Group on Health, an association representing large employers on healthcare and health benefits. He said it's a particularly important decision for employers that operate in multiple states that might otherwise have to comply with a conflicting patchwork of state laws and requirements.

    “To have to comply with the laws and administrative requirements for running their plans in each of those jurisdictions would incur significant cost, significant staff time and really inhibit their ability to uniformly administer their plans,” Wojcik said.

    The court remained true to the purpose of ERISA, said Stuart Gerson, a member at Epstein Becker Green who often represents insurers.

    “Congress has spoken to a need for national uniformity and we and the Supreme Court are going to stand up for that,” Gerson said.

    Others, however, decried the decision as a blow to state efforts at healthcare reform. Seventeen other states have all-payer databases similar to Vermont's, meaning the decision could affect them as well. Eighteen states and the District of Columbia filed briefs in the case supporting Vermont.

    In a dissenting opinion, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg noted that 20% of Vermont's database information comes from self-insured plans.

    “Stopping states from collecting claims data from self-insured employer health care plans would thus hugely undermine the reporting regimes on which Vermont and other States depend to maintain and improve the quality, and hold down the cost, of health care services,” Ginsburg wrote.

    The American Hospital Association called the decision “disappointing,” saying that self-insured plans cover a growing number of people. About 63% of covered workers are enrolled in a plan that is either partially or totally self-funded, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

    “It is essential that they be included in all-payer databases if those databases are to realize their potential,” the AHA said in a statement.

    But Alfred Gobeille, chair of the Green Mountain Care Board and the official petitioner in the case, said in an interview Tuesday the decision won't necessarily stop states from continuing to seek the data from insurers for their databases. The Green Mountain Care Board is an independent board that oversees healthcare regulation in Vermont.

    “It's tough when you lose, but I still see some hope in this decision,” Gobeille said.

    He noted that though the justices decided against Vermont, they laid out a path by which Vermont and other states might still be able to compel self-funded insurers to share the information.

    In the majority opinion, Kennedy wrote that the secretary of labor may be able to require self-funded insurers to report the kinds of data that Vermont wants. Kennedy wrote “these decisions are for federal authorities, not for the separate states.”

    Gobeille said the question now is whether Vermont and the other states with all-payer databases can work together to seek a remedy from the Secretary of Labor. He acknowledged that getting such a remedy might not be easy or fast, but the justices seem to be saying it's possible. Also, the federal government filed a brief in the case supporting Vermont's efforts.

    Gobeille also said the ruling, for the most part, doesn't stop Vermont from getting the data it needs. Self-funded insurers are mostly submitting the data to the state voluntarily, he said. The state has enough data to get a good view of the system, he said.

    Vermont brought the case to the Supreme Court, however, to get clarity moving forward—and the decision Tuesday provided that, he said.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    Ezike 800.jpg
    Former Illinois health chief Ezike under scrutiny by state's top ethics investigator
    AHRQ Director Robert Valdez in front of American flag
    Q&A: AHRQ chief aims to help communities improve their health systems
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare Alert: Sign up for this breaking news email to be kept in the loop as urgent healthcare business news unfolds.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2022. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • COVID-19
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Digital Health
    • Insights
      • ACA 10 Years After
      • Best Practices
      • Special Reports
      • Innovations
    • Data/Lists
      • Rankings/Lists
      • Interactive Databases
      • Data Points
    • Op-Ed
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Awards
      • Nominate/Eligibility
      • 100 Most Influential People
      • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
      • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
      • Excellence in Governance
      • Health Care Hall of Fame
      • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
      • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
      • Top 25 Innovators
      • Diversity in Healthcare
        • - Luminaries
        • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
        • - Leaders to Watch
      • Women in Healthcare
        • - Luminaries
        • - Top 25 Women Leaders
        • - Women to Watch
    • Events
      • Conferences
        • Transformation Summit
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Leadership Symposium
      • Galas
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Supply Chain Revenue Cycle
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Strategic Marketing
        • - Virtual Health
      • Webinars
      • Custom Media Event: ESG Summit
    • Listen
      • Podcast - Next Up
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • MORE +
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Newsletters
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing