Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Blogs
    • AI
    • Deals
    • Layoff Tracker
    • HIMSS 2023
  • Opinion
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - AI and Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
  • Data & Insights
    • Data & Insights Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Safety & Quality
November 30, 2015 11:00 PM

C-section overuse adds to maternal, infant deaths

Sabriya Rice
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    Far too many women in the U.S. continue to give birth by cesarean section, leading to unnecessarily high rates of maternal and infant deaths, according to research published in JAMA.

    About 33% of pregnant women in the U.S. deliver babies via C-section, but an optimal rate would be around 19%, according to the study. The researchers looked at outcomes of more 23 million cesarean deliveries from 194 countries and examined the relationship between C-section rates and maternal and neonatal mortality.

    Alternatively, researchers found that in many countries, not enough C-sections were being performed, suggesting inadequate access to safe and timely emergency obstetrical care.

    "This suggests on a policy level that benchmarks for C-section rates a on countrywide level should be re-examined and could be higher than previously thought," said Dr. Alex Haynes, the primary investigator. He's a researcher with Ariadne Labs, a joint center of Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Harvard School of Public Health. Researchers from the Stanford University School of Medicine also participated in the study.

    While the surgical procedure is can be lifesaving for women who experience obstructed labor, patient safety experts say too many pregnant women and their physicians in the U.S. schedule the surgery for convenience. Like any operation, the procedure carries risks, such as potential infections, blood loss and scarring.

    There have been major national campaigns aimed at significantly reducing the rates. A total of 1,284,339 (or 32.7%) of all deliveries were done by C-section in 2013, according tofederal estimates released this year (PDF). Those rates had steadily increased every year since 1996 before peaking in 2009. They dropped 0.1% between 2012 and 2013.

    Maternal mortality rates and costs are higher for women who undergo C-section compared with those for women who have a vaginal birth. For women with newborns who had employer-provided health insurance, the average total charge for cesarean births was about $20,000 higher than for women who had vaginal births, according to estimates from the Center for Healthcare Quality and Payment Reform.

    Other studies have found that the rates of women giving birth by C-section vary widely by location. For example, a Consumer Reports investigation in 2014 showed higher rates among for-profit hospitals and facilities that serve large urban areas. The lowest rates were in the Mountain states, the Upper Midwest and West Coast.

    While groups such as the March of Dimes, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine have sounded the alarm in the U.S., the JAMA study notes that the opposite problem exists in other countries, where surgery may not be an available option. The study also suggests that the World Health Organization's 10% to 15% “ideal rate” for cesarean births is too low.

    The study notes several limitations. Causality could not be inferred for the relationship between cesarean delivery rates and mortality. Nor could differences in delivery rates related to regional differences or wealth be accounted for.

    Still, the findings highlight the need for a re-evaluation of international efforts to lower rates, Drs. Mary D'Alton and Mark Hehir of the Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons suggest in an accompanying editorial. Scheduling fewer C-sections has long been seen as a marker of better quality, but the rates alone may not be a strong enough measure, they said.

    “Viewed in isolation they provide inadequate information regarding the quality of practice in a healthcare system,” they wrote. Determining what rate works best “cannot be as simple as a one-fits-all figure.”

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    QUALITY OFFICER
    NCQA health plan quality ratings include new equity measure
    Hospital with money
    More hospitals to be charged readmissions penalties: CMS
    Most Popular
    1
    CMS tries luring providers to revamped Medicare ACOs
    2
    Oregon joins other states in setting ratios for nurse staffing
    3
    Blue Shield CA taps Amazon, Mark Cuban, CVS for new PBM model
    4
    A health innovation hub grows in Lake Nona Medical City
    5
    Hospital-at-home providers push for Medicaid coverage
    Sponsored Content
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Help Center
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Blogs
      • AI
      • Deals
      • Layoff Tracker
      • HIMSS 2023
    • Opinion
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - AI and Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
      • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
    • Data & Insights
      • Data & Insights Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing