Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • Data Center
    • Data Center Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Providers
November 17, 2015 12:00 AM

Joint Commission shelves Top Performer program

Sabriya Rice
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    A total of 1,043 hospitals made the Joint Commission's 2015 Top Performers list, an annual award that recognizes facilities for high marks on a suite of 49 accountability measures. That's about 180 fewer high achievers than last year.

    However, it's telling that in the current chaotic state of healthcare quality measures, the accreditation body also said during the release of its annual report that it will suspend the highly popular award for at least one year. (Search the 2015 Top Performers by hospital and state.)

    “Due to the evolving national performance measure environment—particularly within the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services,” the program will be put on hiatus, CEO Dr. Mark Chassin said in the report's introduction. “In 2017, we will return with a refreshed program.” The commission has been issuing the recognition each fall since 2010.

    The science of performance measurement in healthcare is “all over the place,” safety leaders have said. Researchers who specialize in health policy, quality and safety, and organizations that represent hospitals have all urged scrutiny of the metrics that rate, rank and financially penalize U.S. facilities.

    “The stakes are getting much higher,” said Dr. Peter Pronovost, director of the Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality at Johns Hopkins Medicine.

    For example, as much as 6% of a hospital's base operating pay from Medicare could be on the line by 2017 through combined federal quality incentive programs.

    “When you ratchet up the stakes, you'd better make sure that what you are measuring is accurate,” Pronovost said.

    The Joint Commission said it is re-evaluating the current landscape, and part of the goal is to make sure the measures used remain closely aligned with the CMS' reporting programs. But it appears that is becoming more challenging.

    The federal government has “gone in a different direction” and is increasingly relying on billing data, Chassin said in an interview with Modern Healthcare. During a news conference, he noted that the Joint Commission does not use measures derived from hospital billing data because they don't work well to accurately identify complications and they don't provide insight on the severity of patients' conditions. "We don't believe those are valid measures of quality," he said.

    The report released Tuesday notes significant changes to the CMS' Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting program, as well as the CMS retiring topped out measures.

    The latter concerned Chassin. “Taking the spotlight off of very valid measures of quality is not an appropriate policy position,” he said. “When you take the spotlight off, performance deteriorates. Why would you want to take that risk?” he said.

    It's a very delicate issue, agreed Pronovost, noting that it is also expensive to collect data. He suggests randomly rotating measures in and out of the cycle to ensure accountability and coming up with more robust ways of evaluating the effectiveness of metrics across the board.

    The proliferation of ratings groups and the wildly different conclusions that are generated have been ongoing concerns as transparency becomes more prevalent in healthcare. A rating scheme can be created nowadays by “anyone with a computer,” said Dr. Robert Wachter, interim chairman of the department of medicine at the University of California at San Francisco. “But the result for patients may be cacophony,” he said. “Sometimes less is more.”

    The Joint Commission says another reason for its pause next year is because the way data is collected is changing. The group introduced a flexible reporting option for the current calendar year so hospitals could choose which measure they would report based on the procedures they perform.

    Critics have said the commission's top performance award focuses too much on process measures (such as how many heart attack patients received aspirin) rather than outcome measures (like how many patients died or had complication). Data suggests that processes are easier to improve on than outcomes.

    However, Chassin countered that you can't improve outcomes if you don't change the process. Furthermore, he said that while many of the process measures are evidence-based, some outcome metrics used by other ratings groups are “so fundamentally flawed,” that they can't judge performance.

    The determination for this year's list of recognized hospitals is based on 2014 data submitted by 3,315 facilities. The facilities are evaluated on accountability measures that relate to care for children's asthma, heart attacks, perinatal care, pneumonia, psychiatry, stroke, surgery, substance use, tobacco treatment and venous thromboembolism.

    Nearly one-third of Joint Commission-accredited hospitals achieved the award this year. While 180 fewer made the list this year compared to last fall, Chassin said this was anticipated as more required metrics were added to the list. A total of 650 hospitals made the list for the second year in a row and 117 have been on the list for five consecutive years.

    While the temptation to add more measures and introduce new ratings is great, Wachter encourages “taking a bit of a breather and trying to separate out the wheat from the chaff” when it comes to the ratings maze. Others who issue such lists may want to do the same, he said, to understand whether they are truly adding unique value.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    finance graphs hospital
    Primary care physicians' pay growth picked up in 2022: MGMA
    Home cancer treatment faces challenges post-pandemic
    Home cancer treatment faces challenges post-pandemic
    Most Popular
    1
    More healthcare organizations at risk of credit default, Moody's says
    2
    Centene fills out senior executive team with new president, COO
    3
    SCAN, CareOregon plan to merge into the HealthRight Group
    4
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan unveils big push that lets physicians take on risk, reap rewards
    5
    Bright Health weighs reverse stock split as delisting looms
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare A.M. Newsletter: Sign up to receive a comprehensive weekday morning newsletter designed for busy healthcare executives who need the latest and most important healthcare news and analysis.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Data Center
      • Data Center Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing