Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Blogs
    • AI
    • Deals
    • Layoff Tracker
    • HIMSS 2023
  • Opinion
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - AI and Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
  • Data & Insights
    • Data & Insights Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Providers
October 16, 2015 12:00 AM

Medicare ACOs lost $41 million to poor quality performance

Melanie Evans
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    Keeping people out of the hospital is a primary goal of Medicare accountable care. For the most financially successful ACOs, however, that proved difficult last year, even with money on the line.

    That weak performance, policy experts say, raises questions about the accuracy of quality measures in the rapidly expanding program. Proponents of ACOs tout the measures as safeguards for patients from providers who may withhold necessary care to curb spending.

    In August, Medicare announced awards for ACOs, including $273 million for 65 Medicare accountable care organizations in their second year under the Affordable Care Act program. The awards are based on how much money ACOs save for Medicare patients under their care. Most ACOs keep half of what they save. But starting in the second year, awards are also adjusted based on the quality of care.

    Medicare reduced the financial awards for 65 ACOs by $41 million based on quality performance, according to an analysis by the consulting firm Leavitt Partners. Medicare ties ACO financial performance to zero measures in year one; 19 measures in year two and all 33 measures in the final year.

    The biggest contributor to a drop of quality ratings was a measure of avoidable initial hospitalizations for patients with congestive heart failure, which accounted for $5.6 million, or about 13% of the total reduction to ACO awards. Another measure of preventable initial hospitalizations—for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma—dragged down awards by another $3.6 million.

    The top financial performers did so poorly that none ranked in the top 90th percentile nationally, said David Muhlestein, senior director of research and development for consulting firm Leavitt Partners. That was true also for the other roughly 260 ACOs that reported performance on the measure for 2014. With such a large group, more variation in performance would be expected, he said, raising questions about why ACOs uniformly did so poorly.

    ACOs must rank in the top 90th percentile to receive full credit for a measure, which is indicated by 2 or 4 points. Points decrease as ACOs performance drops below the 90th percentile. Those that score in the 30th percentile or below get no points. Points are used to calculate an overall score, which Medicare uses to adjust financial awards.

    Among ACOs operated jointly by publicly traded insurer Universal American and physicians' groups across multiple states, five of the nine ACOs to earn financial awards in 2014 performed in the bottom 40th percentile or lower for hospital admissions for conditions that may be managed outside the hospital, in this case among heart failure patients.

    Jeffery Spight, who oversees Universal American's ACOs, said the performance largely reflected the challenges ACOs faced collecting data and documenting heart failure patients appropriately. The two dozen ACOs under Universal American's joint ventures operate across 340 electronic medical records and all but one are made up entirely of physician practices that range from solo operators to multispecialty groups, he said. That presents significant obstacles gathering necessary data to meet Medicare reporting standards.

    The Accountable Care Coalition of Maryland, one of Universal American's ACOs, received no points for prevention of heart failure admissions with performance below the 30th percentile. The ACO saved Medicare roughly $4 million, of which the ACO received $1.4 million after adjustments for quality.

    Measures of hospital use may also be significantly affected by differences across ACO patients, said Dr. J. Michael McWilliams, an associate professor of health policy at Harvard University who studies the issue.

    The CMS makes some effort to adjust performance to reflect the fact that some hospitals and doctors care for sicker patients than others, but that adjustment is limited, he said.

    McWilliams and colleagues reported in JAMA Internal Medicine in September that nearly two dozen social, clinical, financial and demographic characteristics “significantly predicted” hospital readmissions. The characteristics—social support, functional status, income, race and ethnicity, education—are not included in the CMS' formulas to adjust for readmission rates.

    Hospitals with high readmission rates were more likely to have patients with characteristics linked to readmissions, for which Medicare now penalizes hospitals based on performance. “The penalties that are levied are due to the patient they serve and not the quality of care they provide,” McWilliams said.

    The failure to adjust measures of hospital use appropriately might discourage providers from joining ACOs when financial performance suffers as a result, he said. ACOs already offer relatively weak financial incentives and penalties for poor quality performance weaken it further, he said.

    McWilliams said incentives could be designed differently to achieve federal goals to protect patients from stinting and improve quality.

    He questioned measures of use, such as admissions, as markers of quality when it's unclear how well that measure works. “The objective of the healthcare system is not to prevent patients from ever going to the hospital,” he said. "Hospitalization can be quite beneficial.”

    Instead of using quality measures to monitor and protect against doctors who might withhold needed care for financial gain, the CMS could instead track indicators of stinting separately, he said. That would deter providers from scrimping on care to meet financial targets. Quality measures could then target care for which providers may see little financial benefit, such as preventive care that may not save money for years.

    Meanwhile, quality measures should be designed to track care that may not deliver an immediate return on investment. Quality measures could also track historical performance rather than national benchmarks, he said. That might better capture ACO performance over time with less risk of comparisons across diverse patient groups across the country.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    Rob Allen Intermountain 23
    Intermountain's Graphite Health may be AI 'grounding point,' CEO says
    Nursing home wheelchair
    4,000 Michigan nursing home beds at risk in proposed staffing mandate
    Most Popular
    1
    CMS tries luring providers to revamped Medicare ACOs
    2
    Oregon joins other states in setting ratios for nurse staffing
    3
    Blue Shield CA taps Amazon, Mark Cuban, CVS for new PBM model
    4
    A health innovation hub grows in Lake Nona Medical City
    5
    Hospital-at-home providers push for Medicaid coverage
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare A.M. Newsletter: Sign up to receive a comprehensive weekday morning newsletter designed for busy healthcare executives who need the latest and most important healthcare news and analysis.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Help Center
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Blogs
      • AI
      • Deals
      • Layoff Tracker
      • HIMSS 2023
    • Opinion
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - AI and Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
      • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
    • Data & Insights
      • Data & Insights Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing