Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Login
  • My Account
  • Logout
  • Register For Free
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Blogs
    • AI
    • Deals
    • Layoff Tracker
    • HLTH 2024
    • Sponsored Content: Vital Signs Blog
  • Opinion
    • Letters
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • 40 Under 40
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Innovators Awards
    • Diversity Leaders
    • Leading Women
    • Best in Business Awards
    • The 2030 Playbook Conference
    • Innovations in Patient Experience
    • Leading Women Conference & Awards Luncheon
    • Leadership Summit
    • Workforce Summit
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Diversity Leaders Gala
    • - Looking Ahead to 2025
    • - Financial Growth
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Looking Ahead to 2026
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
  • Data & Insights
    • Data & Insights Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Skilled Nursing Facilities
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
    • Sponsored Content
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Finance
March 28, 2015 12:00 AM

Questions mount on VA cost overruns, delays

Andis Robeznieks
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Getty images
    Medicaid penalties for hospital-acquired conditions would include and perhaps go beyond those targeted by Medicare, including infections associated with vascular catheters.

    “Good riddance.”

    That was the two-word statement issued by U.S. Rep. Jared Polis (D-Colo.) on hearing the news that Glenn Haggstrom, the Veterans Affairs Department chief of acquisition, logistics and construction, had resigned last week.

    Haggstrom had become the face of the controversy over huge cost overruns and delays on four large VA hospital projects in Aurora, Colo., Orlando, Fla., New Orleans and Las Vegas. Those projects have seen their costs mushroom between 66% and 487% and their openings delayed by 14 to 86 months.

    Haggstrom's resignation came after VA Deputy Secretary Sloan Gibson told Congress on March 17 that the cost of the Aurora hospital, under construction on the Anschutz Medical Campus outside Denver, had increased by $930 million to $1.73 billion and that the VA needed Congress to approve another $830 million to complete the project.

    But Rep. Jeff Miller (R-Fla.), chairman of the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs, said Congress “will not authorize another dime until VA gets its construction affairs in order. VA must generate a deficit-neutral plan to pay for these options. The department owns this mess, and it's not fair to force taxpayers to bail out the bungling bureaucrats who created it.”

    Dennis Kaiser, healthcare market sector leader for the Boston office of Perkins & Will architects, said large projects like the VA facilities have to be constantly reviewed to ensure their scope is still aligned with their budgets. He said checkpoints need to be established that allow for course correction if projects go astray. His firm, he said, employs two independent estimators to assess whether designs will match their budgets.

    “The crystal-balling of where prices are going is more of an art,” Kaiser said. He added, however, that history and data can be used to develop a reasonable schedule that can account for changing circumstances.

    Richard Galling, president and chief operating officer of healthcare developer Hammes Co., said common mistakes that lead to runaway costs include approving projects before their scope is defined and the potential risks are thoroughly reviewed, and basing expense projections on faulty market assessments or incomplete cost information.

    Colorado's congressional delegation released a statement that condemned the cost overruns and delays but also expressed support for getting the Aurora project completed.

    Rep. Mike Coffman (R-Colo.) introduced a bill in January that would cap spending on the new Aurora facility at $1.1 billion. The bill also would “fire” the VA from managing any future construction projects costing more than $10 million and turn that responsibility over to the Army Corps of Engineers. It also calls for the Government Accountability Office to find out when senior VA officials knew about “excessive cost overruns” on the Aurora project and why that information was withheld from Congress.

    A House Committee on Veterans' Affairs hearing to explore options on how to proceed with the Aurora hospital is scheduled for April 15.

    The GAO has chronicled the problems experienced with these projects in reports released this past January and in April 2013. The reports said the Aurora and Orlando projects were first envisioned as joint ventures between the VA and local academic medical centers, but that they were later changed to stand-alone facilities; those decisions contributed to significant cost increases. For the Aurora project, the GAO said the VA had concerns about sharing a facility and governance with the University of Colorado and also about space limitations.

    The GAO also said the Aurora site had to mitigate problems caused by asbestos in existing buildings, a swimming pool that had been built over, and a previously undetected underground spring that required water to be constantly pumped away from the site.

    The Las Vegas facility originally was considered a clinic expansion of a facility shared with the Nellis Air Force Base. Costs increased 80% after it was decided to build a stand-alone facility. The GAO also noted that after designs were completed on a mental-health ward in Las Vegas, the VA released new guidelines on mental-health facilities and the space had to be redesigned to meet those guidelines.

    The eventual site of the Orlando project, the Lake Nona Medical City development, is the third location for which the project has been designed. A primary-care clinic opened there in February, and a phased opening of the rest of the facility is underway but may not be complete until next year.

    On the New Orleans project, the GAO said massive rebuilding in that city after Hurricane Katrina added to labor and material costs of that facility.

    Experts say, however, that none of these issues should have created such massive delays and additional expenses.

    “Communication is at the heart of most of these types of problems,” Kaiser said. “If any agency doesn't have a clear point of direction or someone who can respond to issues quickly, problems occur.”

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    tariffs-healthcare-money-finance-0225
    How health system CFOs are navigating the growing uncertainty
    value based care integrated
    Evernorth, Optum, CenterWell units buoyed insurers in Q1
    Most Popular
    1
    'Legendary' Hemsley takes over at UnitedHealth amid rough seas
    2
    Big retail tried to disrupt healthcare—who is making a dent?
    3
    These are the regulations the AHA wants RFK Jr. to scrap
    4
    Downside risk, upside payment highlight new CMS innovation agenda
    5
    Medicaid cuts bill clears key House committee
    Sponsored Content
    Daily Finance Newsletter: Sign up to receive daily news and data that has a direct impact on the business and financing of healthcare.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Help Center
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2025. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Blogs
      • AI
      • Deals
      • Layoff Tracker
      • HLTH 2024
      • Sponsored Content: Vital Signs Blog
    • Opinion
      • Letters
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • 40 Under 40
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Innovators Awards
        • Diversity Leaders
        • Leading Women
        • Best in Business Awards
      • Conferences
        • The 2030 Playbook Conference
        • Innovations in Patient Experience
        • Leading Women Conference & Awards Luncheon
        • Leadership Summit
        • Workforce Summit
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Diversity Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Looking Ahead to 2025
        • - Financial Growth
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Looking Ahead to 2026
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
      • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
    • Data & Insights
      • Data & Insights Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Skilled Nursing Facilities
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing
      • Sponsored Content