Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • Data Center
    • Data Center Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Insurance
March 07, 2015 12:00 AM

Dramatic day at high court leaves everyone guessing about ACA's future

Lisa Schencker
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Paul Demko
    Michael Cannon, director of health policy studies for the libertarian Cato Institute, spoke with reporters last week after oral arguments in King v. Burwell. Cannon was a key strategist behind this latest legal challenge to the Affordable Care Act.

    Everyone inside the Supreme Court's vaulted chambers last week knew they were witnessing a historic case with high stakes for healthcare.

    Congressional leaders, including Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and Sen. Lamar Alexander (R-Tenn.) sat next to each other. HHS Secretary Sylvia Mathews Burwell and former HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius watched from farther back. Journalists packed the side of the chamber, some peering from behind curtains to see the action. They saw a tense 80 minutes of oral arguments in the King v. Burwell case challenging the legality of premium subsidies in as many as 37 states.

    The justices were their usual feisty selves, peppering U.S. Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. and the petitioners' attorney Michael Carvin of Jones Day with lots of tough questions, which the two advocates ably handled.

    No one can predict which side will prevail. But the justices offered some intriguing clues about how the behind-the-scenes negotiations will go in the case.

    Justice Anthony Kennedy, a possible swing vote, raised doubts about Carvin's argument, saying that yanking subsidies from residents of states that did not set up their own insurance exchanges might violate principles of federalism and states' rights. “There's a serious constitutional problem if we adopt your argument,” he said.

    With those words, Kennedy provided fuel for speculation over the next three months that he may side with the Obama administration and save the Affordable Care Act.

    MH Takeaways

    The justices offered intriguing clues about how the behind-the-scenes negotiations will go in King v. Burwell.

    The King case turns on whether the ACA's language allows federal premium tax credit subsidies in all states or only those states that “established” their own exchanges. If the justices invalidate subsidies in states using the federal exchange, millions of Americans likely would drop their coverage because they would not be able to afford it, and insurance markets in those states might go into a death spiral. A ruling is expected in June.

    It was clear from the beginning that the four liberal-leaning justices—Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Elena Kagan, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor—were on the government's side from the thrust of their questions for Carvin.

    He argued that the case is one of “straightforward” statutory construction. A part of the law that says subsidies are available to Americans who enrolled through “an exchange established by the state” speaks for itself, he said.

    Kagan responded that it's important to consider the law's structure and context, not only those few words. Breyer commented on another section of the law that states the HHS secretary shall “establish and operate such exchange within the state,” saying that phrase paired with another phrase seemed to indicate that the law envisioned only one type of exchange.

    Later, conservative Justices Antonin Scalia and Samuel Alito fired critical questions at Verrilli. Justice Clarence Thomas characteristically remained silent, sometimes leaning back in his chair with his eyes closed.

    Scalia said it's “gobbledygook” to say that the phrase “establish and operate such exchange within the state” indicates the federal government can establish a state exchange. Alito hinted that the justices might consider staying a ruling against the subsidies until the end of 2015 to give Congress and the states time to mitigate any potential fallout, though such a delay would be highly unusual.

    “You could speculate that was an effort by Justice Alito to bring on board a few wavering justices,” said Thomas Miller, a resident fellow at the conservative American Enterprise Institute, which favors eliminating the subsidies.

    Scalia added that he was confident Congress would take action to minimize “disastrous consequences” if the subsidies were struck down. Verrilli drew laughs when he responded: “This Congress, your honor?”

    Scalia's and Alito's comments signal possible negotiating points in coming months, said Ankur Goel, a health partner with McDermott Will & Emery who co-authored an amicus brief in the case for the American Public Health Association, siding with the government. He predicted that the justices who want to invalidate the subsidies will argue that such a ruling would not necessarily lead to an insurance market death spiral.

    Everyone in the courtroom closely watched Chief Justice John Roberts. He was the swing vote in upholding the ACA's constitutionality in 2012, giving healthcare industry stakeholders hope that he might swing the same way this time.

    But Roberts offered few clues, remaining mostly silent as arguments swirled around him. Veteran court watchers said he usually participates much more actively.

    “To me that says that he's very cognizant that this is one of those cases that will define the tenor of his court and his legacy,” said Andrew Shin, healthcare policy director at the government consulting firm ML Strategies. Shin said Roberts likely was trying to demonstrate that he didn't come in with an agenda.

    But Roberts made brief comments at the end that became the subject of intense speculation. He asked Verrilli to clarify whether the government thought the court, if it found the ACA's language ambiguous, should defer to the Internal Revenue Service's interpretation that the subsidies should be available in all states.

    “If you're right,” he asked Verrilli, “that would indicate that a subsequent administration could change that interpretation?”

    Tim Jost, a law professor at Washington and Lee University and supporter of the law, said Roberts' comment suggests he may be willing to follow the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel ruling in the case. That court found the law's language ambiguous and upheld the subsidies under the Supreme Court's longstanding Chevron doctrine of deferring to federal agencies' interpretations when a law is ambiguous.

    Some observers thought that question suggested Roberts might choose this approach in deciding the case because it would let a subsequent Republican administration change the IRS rule and eliminate the subsidies.

    Larry Vernaglia, chairman of the healthcare practice at Foley & Lardner, which filed an amicus brief on behalf of Trinity Health siding with the government, said that applying the Chevron doctrine would save the subsidies for now. But he said it “also would be an unfortunate outcome if the court wants finality, which it appears they do.”

    However, Kennedy expressed skepticism about applying the Chevron doctrine and deferring to the IRS' interpretation about the availability of subsidies in all states. It seemed like “a drastic step,” he said, to give the IRS discretion considering the billions of dollars involved.

    With that comment, Kennedy tempered the excitement ACA supporters felt about his earlier constitutional concerns regarding the challengers' case. It was a reminder that betting on Supreme Court rulings based on oral arguments is often a bad gamble.

    Follow Lisa Schencker on Twitter: @lschencker

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    cybersecurity_i.jpg
    Massachusetts health insurer faces ransomware attack, member data at risk
    Medicaid website 2
    Insurance brokers banking on Medicaid redeterminations
    Most Popular
    1
    More healthcare organizations at risk of credit default, Moody's says
    2
    Centene fills out senior executive team with new president, COO
    3
    SCAN, CareOregon plan to merge into the HealthRight Group
    4
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan unveils big push that lets physicians take on risk, reap rewards
    5
    Bright Health weighs reverse stock split as delisting looms
    Sponsored Content
    Daily Finance Newsletter: Sign up to receive daily news and data that has a direct impact on the business and financing of healthcare.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Data Center
      • Data Center Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing