Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Blogs
    • AI
    • Deals
    • Layoff Tracker
    • HIMSS 2023
  • Opinion
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • 40 Under 40
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - AI and Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
  • Data & Insights
    • Data & Insights Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Government
February 20, 2015 11:00 PM

Challengers avoid legal standing issue in King subsidies case

Lisa Schencker
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    A new brief filed by those asking the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down the Obamacare premium subsidies focuses on what they fear are the government's strongest arguments for upholding the subsidies, experts say. But it makes no mention of new questions about whether the four individual plaintiffs have legal standing to even bring the case.

    “The petitioners are trying to avoid (the standing issue) at all costs,” said Lisa McElroy, an associate professor of law at Drexel University.

    At issue in King v. Burwell is whether the language of the Affordable Care Act allows federal premium tax credits only in states that established their own insurance exchanges. Experts say that if the petitioners win and subsidies are no longer available in as many as 37 states using the federal exchange, the law's insurance expansion and reforms will fall apart.

    The brief filed last week argues that the ACA's term “established by the state” is not a “term of art” as the government claims, and that the Internal Revenue Service rule interpreting the law to allow premium subsidies in all states should be invalidated. “It would certainly be convenient, for an agency seeking to rewrite a statute, if an English phrase can become a term of art on the Government's mere say-so,” the brief argues. “It cannot.”

    The brief also seeks to debunk the government's argument that the word “such” proves that Congress intended the federal exchange to be considered identical to the state-run exchanges. The law says that if a state does not establish its own exchange, then HHS “shall (directly or through agreement with a not-for-profit entity) establish and operate such Exchange within the State.”

    MH Takeaways

    Media reports have raised doubts about the four plaintiffs' legal right to bring the case.

    The petitioners' brief argues that “ 'such Exchange' clarifies what HHS is establishing; it does not alter the reality that HHS, not the state, is establishing it.”

    Media reports this month have raised doubts about the legal right of the plaintiffs to sue because they may not be required to buy insurance and therefore may not be harmed by the law. All four may have incomes low enough that they qualify for hardship exemptions from having to buy coverage. In addition, two reportedly are military veterans and may have health coverage through the Veterans Affairs Department. One will qualify for Medicare in June, probably before the court decides the case.

    The petitioners' lack of acknowledgement of the standing issue doesn't necessarily mean they aren't worried about it, McElroy said. The Supreme Court could ask for supplemental briefings on the standing issue, or it could come up during oral arguments next month. If the justices decide that none of the plaintiffs have standing, they could dismiss the case as improvidently granted, McElroy said.

    Tim Jost, a law professor at Washington and Lee University who supports the ACA, said the petitioners should have addressed the standing questions in their brief. The government previously raised the standing issue but without the benefit of the new information about the plaintiffs that has been reported. “I think very serious questions have been raised about the standing of the plaintiffs in this case and I think they have an obligation to come forward and refute those challenges,” he said.

    But Andrew Kloster, a legal fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation, said the standing issue was addressed in earlier briefs. “It's an effort to play the PR game and distract people and make it look like this is some nefarious effort rather than an honest effort to make the federal government comply with the letter of the law,” he said.

    Follow Lisa Schencker on Twitter: @lschencker

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    congress prescription drugs
    PBMs, Big Pharma face off in House hearing
    Biden COVID copy_i_i.jpg
    Biden administration asks employers to help more workers who lose Medicaid
    Most Popular
    1
    Centene to lay off 2,000 workers
    2
    How health systems are battling price-gouging allegations
    3
    Senate advances bill to temporarily aid hospitals, health centers
    4
    Elevance, Blue Cross Louisiana halt $2.5B proposed deal
    5
    Tower Health to sell urgent care centers, close others
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare Alert: Sign up for this breaking news email to be kept in the loop as urgent healthcare business news unfolds.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Help Center
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Blogs
      • AI
      • Deals
      • Layoff Tracker
      • HIMSS 2023
    • Opinion
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • 40 Under 40
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - AI and Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
      • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
    • Data & Insights
      • Data & Insights Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing