Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Blogs
    • AI
    • Deals
    • Layoff Tracker
    • HIMSS 2023
  • Opinion
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - AI and Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
  • Data & Insights
    • Data & Insights Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Providers
January 21, 2015 11:00 PM

Value-based care not likely to end payer/provider financial spats

Bob Herman
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    A large payer and health system in California are embroiled in a bitter feud over expired contract terms, the type of fight all too common in the fee-for-service world. With healthcare switching to value-based care, some had hoped these types of financial squabbles would disappear as the interests of providers and payers became more closely aligned on reducing costs.

    But healthcare observers shouldn't hold their breath for that change yet. Experts largely agree that value-based contracting will not be a panacea for healthcare payment spats, and these types of disagreements will persist in a value-based reimbursement setting. What will change will be the sticking points between insurers and providers—issues such as per-member per-month fees and performance measures, for example.

    “It'll just change what they argue about, not whether they argue,” said Mark Pauly, a health economist at the University of Pennsylvania.

    Some believe “we're going to see more of these price disputes than less,” said Texas A&M health economist Michael Morrisey, because true price transparency has not yet permeated the consumer market and negotiations remain veiled in secrecy.

    The two players at the center of the most recent argument are Blue Shield of California and Sutter Health. Blue Shield is a not-for-profit health insurer with $11 billion in annual revenue and a profit margin that is capped at 2%, said spokesman Steve Shivinsky. Sutter Health, headquartered in Sacramento, is a not-for-profit network of doctors and hospitals with about $10 billion in revenue per year. Through the first nine months of 2014, Sutter posted a 3% margin.

    Similar battles between payers and health systems have routinely cropped up across the country, including high-profile cases in Connecticut, Florida and Georgia. And they all center on which party has more negotiating clout in the respective market. But shouldn't value-based reimbursements—payments that prioritize high-quality outcomes and shared savings—minimize these types of feuds?

    Not really, according to health economists. Richard Hirth, a health policy professor at the University of Michigan, said value-based reimbursement has the potential to decrease price conflicts between insurers and providers because it should, hypothetically, result in more collaborative, less wasteful care, he said.

    “If their incentives are a little more aligned, they obviously have less to fight about,” Hirth said. “I think there's less benefit to airing your laundry in public,” he added. “You essentially are a team, whether you're integrated or not.”

    But instead of merely haggling on fee-for-service rate increases, value-based contracting may spur the two sides to butt heads over other issues. Experts predict that determining lump-sum payments, quality metrics to be used for bonuses or penalties, and arrangements for how shared savings should be split will be the new payment bargaining chips.

    “There's all kinds of dimensions that aren't really part of a straight fee-for-service negotiation,” Hirth said.

    Movement toward value-based payment arrangements is evident, but the number of such contracts is difficult to peg. Catalyst for Payment Reform, a not-for-profit healthcare think tank funded by large employers, estimates 40% of commercial health insurer payments to hospitals and doctors are tied to value-based incentives. That figure could change when factoring in capitated rates associated with Medicare Advantage plans.

    These types of payment designs also come as more consumers and employers demand price transparency, another value-oriented wrinkle that hypothetically should quell industry infighting. Price transparency has become a point of emphasis for patients who increasingly shoulder more of their out-of-pocket healthcare costs through high-deductible health plans.

    But price transparency in the context of payer-provider rate disputes may affect only smaller, elective-type procedures such as colonoscopies, Pauly said. Consumers care only about the prices they have to pay, which are those that come in under their deductible. Most of the costs associated with expensive procedures, such as heart-valve surgery, will likely be covered by those with health insurance, and consumers will assume insurers have gotten the best prices possible, Morrisey added.

    In California, about 270,000 Blue Shield members are stuck in the middle of the quarrel, potentially losing in-network access to Sutter's doctors and hospitals. HMO enrollees have access to Sutter providers until March 31, while PPO members have until June 30.

    Sutter spokesman Bill Gleeson said the system made “an extremely fair and reasonable offer” by proposing an overall price increase “that is less than 1%.” However, Blue Shield officials said in a statement that “Sutter has a long history of driving up the cost of healthcare.” The insurer argued that Sutter's charges are already up to 30% higher than other providers in the region and state, driven in part by Sutter's acquisition of hospitals and other provider groups.

    Blue Shield said another disagreement, aside from payment rates, occurred when Sutter sought new contract terms “that would insulate them from any potential litigation.” Those terms would require Blue Shield and its self-insured customers to take any anticompetitive complaints through an arbitration process instead of the court system. One of Blue Shield's self-insured clients, the benefit trust of the United Food and Commercial Workers union, filed a class-action lawsuit against Sutter last April alleging price gouging.

    But Sutter contends Blue Shield's argument is a “red herring,” saying that it is “standard in the healthcare industry” to settle such disputes through arbitration. “This is about a very large and powerful health insurance company demanding to spend less on actual patient care,” Gleeson said.

    Blue Shield said it hopes it can come to terms, but Sutter isn't expecting a breakthrough. “The parties are very far apart,” Gleeson said. “And we're not optimistic.”

    Follow Bob Herman on Twitter: @MHbherman

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    diversity
    Health equity execs leveraging academic roles to drive long-term change
    Patrick Blair InnovAge
    PACE could expand amid possible nursing home closures: InnovAge CEO
    Most Popular
    1
    Centene to lay off 2,000 workers
    2
    How health systems are battling price-gouging allegations
    3
    Senate advances bill to temporarily aid hospitals, health centers
    4
    Elevance, Blue Cross Louisiana halt $2.5B proposed deal
    5
    Tower Health to sell urgent care centers, close others
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare A.M. Newsletter: Sign up to receive a comprehensive weekday morning newsletter designed for busy healthcare executives who need the latest and most important healthcare news and analysis.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Help Center
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Blogs
      • AI
      • Deals
      • Layoff Tracker
      • HIMSS 2023
    • Opinion
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - AI and Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
      • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
    • Data & Insights
      • Data & Insights Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing