Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • ESG: THE NEW IMPERATIVE
Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • COVID-19
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Transformation
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Digital Health
  • Insights
    • ACA 10 Years After
    • Best Practices
    • Special Reports
    • Innovations
  • Data/Lists
    • Rankings/Lists
    • Interactive Databases
    • Data Points
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Custom Media Event: ESG Summit
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top 25 Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Transformation Summit
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Supply Chain Revenue Cycle
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Virtual Health
    • - Future of Healthcare Staffing
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • MORE +
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Newsletters
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Providers
January 20, 2015 12:00 AM

Justices appear split on lawsuits over low Medicaid rates

Lisa Schencker
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    Some U.S. Supreme Court justices are skeptical, based on questions they posed Tuesday, that healthcare providers should be allowed to sue state Medicaid agencies over low reimbursement rates. Other justices, though, asked where providers can challenge rates if not in court.

    The split made the outcome hard to gauge from the oral arguments in Armstrong v. Exceptional Child Center Inc. Providers argue that the courts are an important avenue for challenging low rates—which they say lead to less access to care for Medicaid patients because too few providers are willing to participate. A number of states, however, counter that Congress has not authorized such lawsuits.

    The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in favor of Idaho providers who sued state Medicaid officials over low rates there. The Idaho Medicaid officials then appealed that ruling to the Supreme Court, which agreed to consider the question of whether such lawsuits are barred by the supremacy clause of the Constitution, which says federal laws take precedence over state laws that conflict with them. The case does not involve whether Idaho's rates actually violate the federal law.

    Carl Withroe, an attorney for the Idaho officials, argued Tuesday that providers have no right under the law to sue state Medicaid officials—an argument that led to questions from the justices about a number of technical legal issues. Justice Sonia Sotomayor also questioned how providers might challenge low Medicaid rates if not in court.

    “Let's assume, as inflation is going up constantly, what happens two years into the plan when providers can't work for what the state is giving or the state is imposing a tremendous hardship on them, which is happening to a lot of providers who are being underpaid. Where do they go?”

    But several of the justices suggested allowing providers to litigate rates could undermine states' ability to control their budgets.

    “The effect, it seems to me, will be putting the setting of budget priorities in the hands of dozens of different federal judges, and I just don't know what the practical significance of that's going to be,” Chief Justice John Roberts said during arguments by James Piotrowski, the attorney representing the providers.

    Piotrowski responded that lawsuits challenging rates have been allowed since at least 1969, “and in that 45-year period, we haven't seen a flood of litigation.”

    Justice Antonin Scalia, though, said that if Congress wanted to allow providers to challenge rates in court, it would have made that explicit. Congress “has not created a private cause of action here and, therefore, it impliedly does not want the scheme that you desire,” Scalia said.

    Scalia and Justice Samuel Alito asked if providers would be better off taking their complaints to the CMS. At least Sotomayor and Justice Elena Kagan, meanwhile, seemed skeptical of Idaho's arguments, said Joel Hamme, a principal with Powers Pyles Sutter & Verville, who filed an amicus brief in the case on behalf of several organizations supporting the providers.

    Hamme said providers might have a bit of an uphill battle persuading the justices to allow them to sue, especially because the Supreme Court reviewed a similar case in 2012 and voted 5-4 at the time not to issue a ruling. That case arose after California providers sued the state over amendments to the state's Medicaid program, including a 10% rate cut.

    Jeff Micklos, general counsel for the Federation of American Hospitals, which also filed an amicus brief in the case, said he felt the questioning was fairly balanced.

    “I do think both sides of the court really recognized the conundrum that there is no meaningful avenue for patients and providers to challenge inadequate state Medicaid rates,” Micklos said. Still, he said, it's difficult to predict which way the justices will rule.

    Matt Salo, executive director of the National Association of Medicaid Directors, also said it was difficult to glean which way the court will lean based on the arguments.

    Salo, who believes rate disputes should not be resolved in court, said the justices asked a number of good questions, including what kind of a precedent could be set by the case.

    “I think that's the right question to ask because that's the question our members are raising,” Salo said. “If we're allowing [providers] to have standing in order to sue, whether or not that opens up the floodgates, it certainly changes the way government works, and I think not in a good way.”

    Follow Lisa Schencker on Twitter: @lschencker

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    colorful-people_i_i.png
    The Joint Commission to add health equity standards to accreditations
    Supporting a truly diverse C-suite
    Supporting a truly diverse C-suite
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare A.M. Newsletter: Sign up to receive a comprehensive weekday morning newsletter designed for busy healthcare executives who need the latest and most important healthcare news and analysis.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2022. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • COVID-19
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Digital Health
    • Insights
      • ACA 10 Years After
      • Best Practices
      • Special Reports
      • Innovations
    • Data/Lists
      • Rankings/Lists
      • Interactive Databases
      • Data Points
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top 25 Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Transformation Summit
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Supply Chain Revenue Cycle
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Virtual Health
        • - Future of Healthcare Staffing
      • Custom Media Event: ESG Summit
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • MORE +
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Newsletters
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing