Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • ESG: THE NEW IMPERATIVE
Subscribe
  • My Account
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • COVID-19
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Transformation
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Digital Health
  • Insights
    • ACA 10 Years After
    • Best Practices
    • Special Reports
    • Innovations
  • Data/Lists
    • Rankings/Lists
    • Interactive Databases
    • Data Points
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Custom Media Event: ESG Summit
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top 25 Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Transformation Summit
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Supply Chain Revenue Cycle
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Virtual Health
    • - Future of Healthcare Staffing
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • MORE +
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Newsletters
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Finance
October 22, 2014 01:00 AM

Reform Update: Bigger doesn't equal cheaper for patients, studies find

Melanie Evans
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    Consolidation across healthcare sectors and local markets may benefit consumers when it reduces costly and potentially harmful duplication and waste. Or not. Consolidation also can increase costs, researchers contend in two newly published studies.

    Patients of doctors in groups owned by hospitals or health systems had much higher annual medical bills (10% to 20%, respectively) than patients treated by doctors who work for themselves or other physicians, according to an analysis of 4.5 million California managed-care enrollees. A second study, which looked nationwide, found an 8% difference in price between the least- and most-competitive markets for physicians.

    Researchers with both studies, published separately by JAMA, said the results underscore the risk that health spending will accelerate thanks to the consolidation that policymakers have encouraged to achieve the opposite result.

    Related Content

    Q3 M&A Watch: Provider, pharmacy sector see lively quarter

    “The consolidation is unstoppable,” said James Robinson, a health economist at the University of California at Berkeley. “The optimistic scenario would be that the consolidating system, instead of increasing prices and increasing use of high-priced services, would collaborate with the insurer to develop targets that hold down the premium.”

    Robinson's look at California's market did not consider prices, but did find results that suggest increased use of high-priced services. The study compared patients' annual total cost of care—for hospital services, physician visits, laboratory tests and pharmaceuticals—by physician employment. Patients of doctors in medical groups owned by health systems were the most costly ($4,776), followed by hospital-owned medical groups ($4,312) and physician-employed doctors ($3,066). (The researchers adjusted for regional differences and the severity of patients' illness.)

    Health system- and hospital-owned medical groups direct patients to laboratories and clinics associated with the hospital or system, which raises prices, Robinson said. Independent doctors may be more likely to use cheaper, independent outpatient services. “There is huge variability out there in the price of the same service, depending on where it is,” he said.

    The second study looked exclusively at physician prices across U.S. markets and compared prices in highly consolidated markets against prices in highly competitive markets. The researchers reviewed prices for 10 common office visits, including internal medicine, cardiology, general surgery and gastroenterology. The more competitive the market, the lower the price, they found.

    The results add to a small group of studies that examine consolidation among physician practices. “This all starts with the growth of larger practices and the policy incentives being created to form larger practices and the private market pushing doctors to form larger practices,” said Laurence Baker, a Stanford University health economist and one author of the study.

    One such policy is the development of accountable care organizations under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Baker said. ACOs encourage closer coordination of doctors' practices, which can be accomplished through consolidation, he said.

    For policymakers, the results should raise questions about how to benefit from consolidation without compromising pricing power, something that may be possible with new incentives for efficiency under creative payment models. Antitrust enforcement also has a role, he said. “I think it's already being done.

    Price-sensitive doctors

    Displaying the price of care to physicians could help constrain costs. But organizations that expose doctors to the price of treatment should, at a minimum, alert doctors to the source of price data and notify patients that doctors can consult the prices of various treatment options, Johns Hopkins University physicians argue in JAMA.

    “Protecting patient autonomy requires informing patients that price displays are being used,” wrote Kevin Riggs and Matthew DeCamp. “This should ideally occur through physician-patient shared decision making, in which the price of a service and its potential influence on a patient's out-of-pocket costs are discussed in conjunction with relevant clinical information, such as potential benefits and risks.” Organizations should also ensure that price displays don't lead to less care or less care for patients with the highest prices, such as those without the discounted rates negotiated by insurance companies.

    Medical homes with multiple payers: Moving beyond the pilot

    The National Academy of State Health Policy released seven recommendations for state Medicaid efforts to foster multi-payer medical homes. The recommendations include this, which also reads like a warning: “Funding: Be tenacious. To be successful, all medical home initiatives require significant ongoing financial investment, administrative effort, and infrastructure.” The recommendation goes on to praise perseverance and creativity as critical. Other recommendations include “reward achievement and drive toward program goals” and “Demonstrate value and make mid-course corrections.”

    Follow Melanie Evans on Twitter: @MHmevans

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    Jason Hollar
    Cardinal Health names new CEO, plans price increases to bolster earnings
    Kaiser Permanente
    Kaiser Permanente has a rough first half as Q2 net loss exceeds $1B
    Sponsored Content
    Daily Finance Newsletter: Sign up to receive daily news and data that has a direct impact on the business and financing of healthcare.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2022. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • COVID-19
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Digital Health
    • Insights
      • ACA 10 Years After
      • Best Practices
      • Special Reports
      • Innovations
    • Data/Lists
      • Rankings/Lists
      • Interactive Databases
      • Data Points
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top 25 Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Transformation Summit
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Supply Chain Revenue Cycle
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Virtual Health
        • - Future of Healthcare Staffing
      • Custom Media Event: ESG Summit
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • MORE +
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Newsletters
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing