Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • ESG: THE IMPLEMENTATION IMPERATIVE
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Digital Health
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Transformation
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Unwell in America
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top 25 Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • Data Center
    • Data Center Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Newsletters
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Providers
October 15, 2014 01:00 AM

Reform Update: Measure ranks docs on how much patients improve

Melanie Evans
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Boynton

    Patients of top-performing doctors were cared for at less expense and left the hospital earlier and in better health than those treated by doctors at the bottom of a new measure of physician value. Demand for ways to rank individual doctors on results is growing and the measure, based on teacher evaluations, highlights the intensity of efforts to develop effective ratings.

    The measure, unveiled in a National Bureau of Economics Research paper, ranked doctors by how much their patients improved during the course of hospitalization, using laboratory test results and surveys throughout hospital visits of patients' health, functional and psychosocial status. The findings—a value rating that researchers analyzed against how long and how often patients were hospitalized and the cost of care—may be the first published attempt to measure physicians' value the same way schools seek to measure the value of teachers: by results.

    Patients of doctors in the top 25% spent less time in the hospital (six hours less) than patients of doctors in the bottom 25%. Patients of top doctors also had an average bill of $17,811, roughly $2,000 less than those of the lowest-ranked doctors, and they saw larger gains in a broad measure of health status with factors that covered heart, respiratory and neurological function.

    The researchers collected health status data using 26 metrics for patients admitted to a Connecticut hospital, from the moment patients arrived until they left. Researchers measured improvement during the course of the hospital stay, much as teacher performance may be measured by students' test scores during an academic year.

    The novel approach may have broader applications with fewer flaws than existing measures of physicians' quality and efficiency, researchers say. Healthcare performance and quality is often measured by whether providers follow the correct procedure to care for patients. Measures of results—quicker recovery and better health—are less common.

    The development of performance measures is a growing priority for employers burdened with ever-rising health benefit costs; public benefit programs with budget constraints; and patients, who increasingly have health plans that encourage comparison shopping. But options are few, and those that exist are limited.

    “There's not really good measurements or mechanisms to measure value,” said Ann Boynton, deputy executive officer for benefit programs, policy and planning, for the California Public Employees' Retirement System, which spent more than $7.5 billion last year on health benefits for more than 1 million people. CalPERS has entered into multiple ventures to test incentives for providers to deliver high-quality, lower-cost care.

    Boynton said such ventures have shown value for specific procedures, such as births, but lack the measures that can identify which doctors, medical groups or hospitals deliver the greatest overall value. “There's really not a lot out there.”

    Hospitals and medical groups, too, are in the market for ratings as public and private insurers move to link a growing share of providers' payments to delivery of high-quality, low-cost care under accountable care and other incentive-based contracts. Medicare introduced accountable care contracts in 2012 and continues to expand their use. Major health systems report a growing number of incentive contracts. Dignity Health, San Francisco, has 74 such contracts with more on the way. Banner Health, Phoenix, Ariz., ended last year with $458 million in revenue from incentive-based contracts.

    Ratings may be used to target incentive payments to high-value providers within networks. Some medical groups, hospitals and accountable care organizations already share performance results with providers and award individual performance incentives.

    “No surprise, provider groups are aligning their compensation model to mimic how they themselves are getting paid in the marketplace,” said Dr. Marcus Zachary, senior medical director for the San Francisco-based Brown & Toland Medical Group. “That just makes good sense.”

    Metrics of performance increasingly take into account results, such as what percentage of doctors' diabetic patients have well-controlled blood sugar, he said. Brown & Toland is shifting its quality improvement focus this year to put more emphasis on results and less focus on process, he said. “That's where the market is going.”

    For policymakers, that market shift is considered critical to maintaining a recent slowdown in the nation's historically fast growth in health expenditures. “It's incredibly obvious, even with the slowdown in spending, that healthcare costs are very important,” said Dr. Leora Horwitz, director of the Center for Healthcare Innovation and Delivery Science at New York University's School of Medicine, and one of three researchers that developed the value measure.

    But practically, consumers care not just about cost but the results they get, she said. “Quality and outcomes and value to patients is equally, if not more, important.” That's why she and her colleagues Jason Fletcher, a healthcare economist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, and Elizabeth Bradley, a public health professor at Yale University, sought to develop a measure of results and cost.

    Early quality-improvement efforts targeted processes but the research on the effectiveness of those processes has significant limits, Horwitz said. Multiple processes contribute to results and it's often unclear which processes are most critical to good outcomes. “There is a relatively limited evidence base for most things,” she said. “That's not a radical statement, although it's disturbing. First of all, we're not even sure what processes we ought to be measuring.”

    Measuring results, however, is a challenge for several reasons. Outcome measures are limited. “Report cards measure mortality or readmission rates,” said Fletcher. And an accurate statistical measure of performance can be undermined when metrics are so discrete and potentially rare among the small pool of patients of any one doctor, said Fletcher.

    In the experiment with the new outcome-based measure carried out in Connecticut, researchers compared average improvement for each doctors' patients through a six-month window.(Researchers also looked at average improvement for the doctors during a second six-month period and found doctors' results were largely the same despite a completely different pool of patients.)

    Researchers acknowledged that limits of the work include the potential contribution of other hospital caregivers. But the method may still be useful.

    “The method allows physicians' added value to be estimated on the basis of every patients' health status rather than on the basis of relatively rate events such as readmission or mortality, and is therefore less sensitive to sampling variation from a small number of patients per physician,” the wrote.

    Pioneer performance: See for yourself

    The CMS for the first time released performance results for Pioneer ACOs, nearly three years after the organizations launched. The new data is the first look at how Pioneer ACOs performed against national quality benchmarks. Modern Healthcare pulled ACOs' financial and quality results for 2013and the national benchmarks at the 30th, 50th and 90th percentile, which you can access here.

    Down or up?

    Politico Pulse and Bloomberg report that Senate Republican budget committee staff projected a $131 billion increase to the U.S. deficit through 2024 from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. That's in contrast to the 2012 Congressional Budget Office estimate that the health reform law would reduce the budget deficit by $109 billion through 2022. The Republican staff analysis took into account implementation delays and changes to economic and health spending projections.

    Follow Melanie Evans on Twitter: @MHmevans

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    373837936 (1).jpg
    New guidelines aim to limit trans healthcare at Catholic hospitals
    InDepth: Private Equity
    Legal questions surround private equity-backed Noble Health
    Most Popular
    1
    More healthcare organizations at risk of credit default, Moody's says
    2
    Centene fills out senior executive team with new president, COO
    3
    SCAN, CareOregon plan to merge into the HealthRight Group
    4
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan unveils big push that lets physicians take on risk, reap rewards
    5
    Bright Health weighs reverse stock split as delisting looms
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare A.M. Newsletter: Sign up to receive a comprehensive weekday morning newsletter designed for busy healthcare executives who need the latest and most important healthcare news and analysis.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Digital Health
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Unwell in America
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top 25 Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Data Center
      • Data Center Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Newsletters
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing