Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • ESG: THE IMPLEMENTATION IMPERATIVE
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Digital Health
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Transformation
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Unwell in America
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top 25 Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • Data Center
    • Data Center Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Newsletters
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Technology
October 09, 2014 01:00 AM

Reform Update: Generic drugs' high prices spur fears of failed drug adherence

Virgil Dickson
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    Faced with the rising costs of generic prescription drugs, health insurers increasingly are turning to tiers and preferred lists on their formularies to keep costs down. Those strategies previously were used only for brand-name and specialty drugs. Experts say those approaches will increase out-of-pocket costs for patients and could make them less likely to adhere to drug regimens.

    For years, insurers have encouraged patients to choose generic drugs because they were less expensive than their brand-name counterparts, and most prescription drugs currently used are generics.

    But over the past year the cost of generic drugs has skyrocketed, including for products that have been on the market for many years. A study by Pembroke Consulting comparing CMS data for average generic drug acquisition costs between July 2013 and July 2014 found that half of the generic drugs listed rose in cost, with the median increase nearly 12%. Some drug prices saw extreme increases. For instance, the per-unit price for a 500 mg capsule of tetracycline, a common antibiotic, increased from $0.05 cents to $8.59, a more than 17,000 % increase.

    Experts say a combination of lack of government oversight over generic pricing, manufacturers exiting the generic market—some because of quality citations from the Food and Drug Administration and some because of claimed insufficient profits—and shortages of active ingredient have contributed to the sharp price increases.

    The generic price hikes are adding to growing concerns about the cost of prescription drugs, which has become a big issue since Gilead Science's introduction of $1,000 per pill Sovaldi to treat hepatitis C. And moves by insurers to control the cost of generics could lead to confusion among consumers—who increasingly have been trained to choose generics—about how and whether generics are different from brand-name drugs.

    Concerns over generic drug prices have reached Capitol Hill. Earlier this month, Rep. Elijah Cummings (D-Md.) and Sen. Bernard Sanders (I-Vt) sent letters to 14 drugmakers that make or distribute generic drugs, requesting explanations for price increases. Hearings could result from the inquiries depending on the responses, which are due by Oct. 23.

    For many health plans, the solution to the rising cost of generics has been to create tiers and preferred lists, requiring members to pay higher copayments for drugs that are not on low-tier or preferred lists. This may mean a jump in the copay from $5 to $20.

    Some experts say any increase in cost sharing can be too much for patients of modest incomes who may simply stop getting their prescriptions filled or take less of the medication than is prescribed by their doctors.

    But Daniel Foss, a spokesman for the 630,000-member HealthPartners Plans, said pricing tiers “help encourage members to ask if there is a lower-cost generic available that may work for them. His company previously had tiered generic lists for its Medicare Advantage plans. It intends to introduce tiered generic lists in its commercial and exchange plans starting in January.

    Other insurers have revised their definition of tiers that already are in place for brand-name drugs. For instance, the 80,000-member Group Health Cooperative of South Central Wisconsin no longer defines tiers in terms of generics and brands. While most generics remain in tier 1, the lowest tier, the plan has moved more expensive generics up to tier 2. Meanwhile, it has shifted some preferred brand-name drugs down to tier 1. “Now, instead of worrying about the definition of category, costs are more directly tied to the cost of the drug itself,” said Jeanan Yasiri Moe, chief planning and innovation officer for the plan.

    Independent Health, a New York insurer with 400,000 members, says it considers quality and clinical effectiveness over price when developing its preferred drug list, said Marty Burruano, vice president of pharmacy. That's because products that help members stay healthy will lead to lower costs. And if higher costs discourage members from using an effective drug, that also leads to poorer health and higher costs for the insurer, he added.

    Gerry Oster, a vice president at the consulting firm Policy Analysis who wrote an article about rising generic prices published last month in the American Journal of Managed Care, said he has no problem with plans switching to tiers for generics to discourage use of products that are not as effective. What troubles him are the cases where there are no other pharmaceutical options on a plan's preferred list for certain ailments and where the higher-cost generic has been shown to be the best option. “Some of these drugs are lifesaving, and you just have to ask yourself what are these plans thinking?” he said.

    Other insurers say they are finding alternative ways to deal with the rising cost of generics. For instance, HealthSpan, which has 100,000 members in Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky, is launching an initiative known as a Health Savings Medication list, which will cap copays for generics at $4, $6 or $8 starting in January. “The two main functions are to help our members save money and help improve adherence by ensuring that members can afford their medications,” said Laura Dunn, a plan spokeswoman.

    Still others say they are not doing anything special related to the rising cost of generic drugs. “Even while the costs of generics rise, they remain more cost-effective than brand-name drugs,” said Mary Beth Chambers, a spokeswoman for Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas. “We are not currently planning to tier generic drugs or prefer a brand name over a generic. Our primary focus continues to be balancing the costs of high-dollar specialty drugs and brand names, and their impact on premiums, with the medical needs of our members.”

    In a written statement, the Generic Pharmaceutical Association said, “The generic industry is unrivaled in its commitment to access to lower-cost drugs for patients... (and it) will continue to play a central role in generating much needed health cost savings and remains firmly committed to delivering safe, more affordable generic medicines to patients who need them.”

    Sanders said in a written statement that “generic drugs were meant to help make medications affordable for the millions of Americans who rely on prescriptions to manage their health needs. We've got to get to the bottom of these enormous price increases.”

    The companies that were sent letters by the congressional panels requesting information about generic price increases included Actavis, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Endo International, Mylan Laboratories, Heritage Pharmaceuticals, Sun Pharmaceutical and Teva Pharmaceuticals.

    No salary hikes at Wal-Mart

    Wal-Mart has no plans to bump up salaries for the 30,000 part-time employees it announced it will no longer offer health coverage for starting Jan. 1, company spokesman Randy Hargrove said.

    The retail giant's decision to end coverage affected employees who work less than an average of 30 hours a week. Hargrove said there is nothing to stop these staff members from seeking more hours or promotions to full-time positions. But Wal-Mart will not offset the loss of the health benefits by boosting the part-timers' pay to help them pay for their own coverage.

    Many of these Wal-Mart part timers will qualify for federal premium subsidies if they buy coverage on the Obamacare insurance exchanges. And many may qualify for Medicaid in states that have expanded Medicaid coverage to adults earning up to 138% of the federal poverty level.

    Meanwhile, Starbucks, a company known for providing healthcare coverage for its part-time employees, said it has no plans to follow the trend to end coverage for part timers, as Target, Home Depot, Walgreens and Trader Joes have done. “It's important for us to make sure our partners are taken care of,” said Laurel Harper, a company spokeswoman.

    13 states to cut non-ACA compliant health plans

    In coming weeks, 13 states and the District of Columbia say they will require insurers to terminate health plans that don't comply with the coverage requirements of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

    Last November, President Barack Obama initially issued an administrative fix allowing states and insurers to let consumers in the individual and small group markets keep plans that did not meet ACA requirements. A number of states allowed a one-year extension of such plans, while some states allowed longer extensions. A number of insurers have chosen not to continue offering non-compliant plans.

    Follow Virgil Dickson on Twitter: @MHvdickson

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    IBM Quantum System One at Cleveland Clinic_4_0.jpg
    Cleveland Clinic, IBM unveil quantum computer
    Dr. Alice Zheng
    Women's digital health sector poised for growth, venture capitalist predicts
    Most Popular
    1
    More healthcare organizations at risk of credit default, Moody's says
    2
    Centene fills out senior executive team with new president, COO
    3
    SCAN, CareOregon plan to merge into the HealthRight Group
    4
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan unveils big push that lets physicians take on risk, reap rewards
    5
    Bright Health weighs reverse stock split as delisting looms
    Sponsored Content
    Health IT Strategist (HITS) Newsletter: Sign up for the latest IT and medical technology news delivered 3 days a week (M, W, F).
     
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Digital Health
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Unwell in America
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top 25 Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Data Center
      • Data Center Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Newsletters
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing