Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • ESG: THE NEW IMPERATIVE
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • COVID-19
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Transformation
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Digital Health
  • Insights
    • ACA 10 Years After
    • Best Practices
    • Special Reports
    • Innovations
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top 25 Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Supply Chain
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • Data Center
    • Data Center Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • MORE +
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Newsletters
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Insurance
September 26, 2014 01:00 AM

Reform Update: Narrow-network concerns spur legal, regulatory, political action

Paul Demko
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    In November, voters in South Dakota will decide whether to adopt an “any willing provider” requirement for insurers operating in the state.

    The genesis of the campaign dates back to well before the Obamacare exchanges opened for business. In March 2013, the South Dakota Senate voted down legislation requiring insurers to cover procedures by any licensed medical provider. “This has nothing to do with the Affordable Care Act, pro or con,” said Dr. Stephen Eckrich, a Rapid City-based orthopedic surgeon, who helped get the measure on the ballot. “Those pressures have been existing.”

    But the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act has heightened concerns about narrow-network plans that have proved popular with consumers during the first year of insurance exchange operations under the federal healthcare law. Insurers and many healthcare economists argue that limiting consumer choice is necessary to control costs and keep premiums affordable.

    On Thursday, California Gov. Jerry Brown signed legislation increasing scrutiny of provider networks in the state. The bill requires insurers to file annual reports with the California Department of Managed Health Care. The agency's assessment of that data will be posted on its website.

    Tensions over narrow networks have been particularly intense in California, with multiple lawsuits challenging the provider networks of plans offered by Anthem Blue Cross, Blue Shield of California and Cigna. Two more cases alleging that consumers were deceived were filed this week in Los Angeles.

    Similar issues have prompted concerns in other parts of the country as well. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners is in the process of revising its model regulations for network adequacy. A draft of its new policy is expected to be released by the end of the year. And the CMS indicated in a letter to insurers in March that it intends to apply heightened scrutiny to provider networks for plans that will be sold on the exchanges during the next open-enrollment period, which begins Nov. 15.

    Richard Cauchi, a state health program director at the National Council of State Legislatures, points out that many state legislatures were far into their sessions, or had already adjourned by the time constituents began using state exchange health plans and subsequently encountered problems with provider networks. “This was a tricky year for legislatures to respond,” Cauchi said. “This is a topic that's quite likely to get increased attention in 2015 once there's a full year of information about results.”

    On Friday, the American Heart Association released a study, conducted by Avalere Health (PDF), looking at exchange-plan inclusion of the specialists most frequently needed by heart disease patients. The study looked at 10 regions across nine states and found wide disparities in access to cardiologists, neurologists and radiologists.

    In Los Angeles, just 8% of those doctors were included in the provider networks of three silver exchange plans scrutinized. By contrast, 83% of those in the Philadelphia region were included in provider networks.

    “This is important because heart attack and stroke patients often don't have a choice as to which physician they're seeing when admitted to a hospital,” said Stephanie Mohl, senior government relations advisor at the American Heart Association. She made her remarks during a forum on network adequacy in Washington on Friday, sponsored by the Alliance for Health Reform.

    The heart association study also looked at access to comprehensive stroke centers, which are certified to treat patients with the most complex conditions. Just 11% of those facilities were part of provider network for the silver plans studied in the Atlanta region, compared with 100% in New Jersey and Philadelphia.

    But former HHS secretary and Utah Gov. Michael Leavitt, speaking at the same forum, warned against a rush to aggressively regulate provider networks. Leavitt pointed out that insurers, providers and consumers are dealing with a lot of unknowns in the fledgling marketplaces and that the markets likely won't stabilize for at least three years.

    The ballot initiative in South Dakota is opposed by health plans operating in the state and large provider networks, particularly Sanford Health and Avera Health. They warn that it will drive up healthcare costs, resulting in higher premiums, by limiting consumer choices.

    A recent study by healthcare researchers Stephen Parente and Robert Book (PDF) lends credence to that fear. By their calculations, premiums would spike by roughly $3,000 to $5,000 over the course of a decade, depending on what level of coverage a family chooses.

    “They're well-meaning, but they usually come at a cost,” Parente said of the any-willing-provider mandates. “You can see who you want, but it's going to cost you.”

    Eckrich, the surgeon who worked to get the issue on the South Dakota ballot, isn't buying those fears. He became dedicated to the cause after an elderly patient came back to see him for a follow-up procedure a year and a half after an ankle procedure. Eckrich was no longer in her plan's network, so she would have had to pay the entire cost of having the second procedure performed by her preferred doctor.

    He's optimistic that voters will embrace what he sees as a common-sense consumer protection. “I don't know who would oppose a patient being able to choose their doctor,” Eckrich said.

    SHOP exchanges offer lower-priced plans, study says

    Obamacare's Small Business Health Option Program exchanges have largely been a bust during year one of enrollment. That's because few states had operational marketplaces where companies could shop for coverage. But the SHOP exchanges have the potential to offer employers cheaper coverage options, according to a new study by the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago. Researchers found that plans offered through the government marketplaces were on average 7% cheaper than coverage options available elsewhere. For middle-tier plans, that translates into more than $200 in annual premium savings.

    Dems not suffering for failed Oregon exchange

    Oregon's exchange was arguably the most dysfunctional in the country, with online enrollment impossible throughout the first sign-up period. State officials have decided to jettison the problem-plagued website and use HealthCare.gov instead. But according to polling data released Friday by SurveyUSA, Democrats don't seem to be paying a price for the disaster. Gov. John Kitzhaber leads his Republican opponent by 12 percentage points. And Democratic Sen. Jeff Merkley—whose GOP challenger, Dr. Monica Wehby, has run on the slogan “keep your doctor, change your senator”—is ahead by 20 percentage points.

    Follow Paul Demko on Twitter: @MHpdemko

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    medicare-advantage-CMS-audits
    More MA insurer audits mean more scrutiny on providers
    medicare advantage directories
    Provider directories are a mess. CMS' plan to fix them has few fans
    Most Popular
    1
    More healthcare organizations at risk of credit default, Moody's says
    2
    Centene fills out senior executive team with new president, COO
    3
    SCAN, CareOregon plan to merge into the HealthRight Group
    4
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan unveils big push that lets physicians take on risk, reap rewards
    5
    Bright Health weighs reverse stock split as delisting looms
    Sponsored Content
    Daily Finance Newsletter: Sign up to receive daily news and data that has a direct impact on the business and financing of healthcare.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • COVID-19
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Digital Health
    • Insights
      • ACA 10 Years After
      • Best Practices
      • Special Reports
      • Innovations
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top 25 Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Supply Chain
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Data Center
      • Data Center Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • MORE +
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Newsletters
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing