The changes will have little to no effect on providers and the ONC estimates that only “a small number of EHR technology developers and other health information technology developers will seek to be tested and certified” to those provisions of this new rule.
The ONC establishes hoops that health IT developers must jump through to qualify their systems for use by providers in the $25 billion EHR incentive payment program created under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009.
Providers' Stage 2 meaningful use and other requirements were revised in a final rule released by the CMS last month.
The CMS rule revisions gave hospitals, physicians and other eligible professionals more flexibility in meeting both Stage 1 and Stage 2 meaningful-use criteria under the program and rolled back the start date of Stage 3 until fiscal and calendar years 2017. Stage 3 had been scheduled to start in fiscal and calendar years 2016.
The original Stage 2 rule and attendant testing and certification criteria were revised earlier this year, due in part to the reported failure of a significant number of EHR vendors to keep pace with the 2014 Edition updates and the consequent inability of providers to implement those updates in time for them to meet the original Stage 2 compliance deadlines.
At the same time, the agency floated the idea of creating the voluntary 2015 Edition to give clearer signals to the industry and avoid such lags.
The ONC said Tuesday that its reasons for that proposal “remain valid.” However, they said, in response public comment and “further reflection of ONC goals and timelines,” the ONC instead “adopted a small subset of our original proposals” to be included as optional criteria for the 2014 Edition Release 2 criteria.
“We note that EHR technology developers do not have to update and recertify their products to the 2014 Edition Release 2, nor do participating hospitals, physicians and other eligible professionals have to upgrade their existing 2014 Edition software to Release 2,” according to the rule. Rather, it asks that participants merely consider whether Release 2 “offers any opportunities they might want to pursue.”
Along with the rule, the ONC has posted a two-page fact sheet (PDF) explaining the changes, including naming conventions for the rules.
Follow Joseph Conn on Twitter: @MHJConn