Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • Data Center
    • Data Center Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Safety & Quality
August 30, 2014 01:00 AM

AHA's Richard Umbdenstock on value-based payments, narrow networks

Modern Healthcare
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    Richard Umbdenstock has served as president and CEO of the American Hospital Association since 2007. His career includes experience in hospital administration; health system governance, management and integration; association governance and management; HMO governance; and healthcare governance consulting. He is vice chairman of the National Quality Forum and serves on the board of Enroll America. Modern Healthcare Editor Merrill Goozner recently spoke with Umbdenstock about the future of value-based payment, narrow networks and antitrust enforcement. This is an edited transcript.

    Modern Healthcare: What's your reaction to the recent court decision barring Obamacare premium subsidies in the federal insurance exchange?

    Richard Umbdenstock: We continue to be supportive of people receiving subsidies through the federal exchange. We're glad to see that this thing will probably move faster toward some sort of Supreme Court resolution.

    MH: What would happen if the Supreme Court struck down subsidies in states using the federal exchange?

    Umbdenstock: That would mean a whole lot less coverage and a whole lot more confusion. I think Congress intended for people (in all the states) to get these subsidies.

    MH: What do you see as the future of moving to value-based payment and of fee-for-service drawing to a close?

    Umbdenstock: The movement to value is here to stay. It's going to take Medicare a while to move off fee-for-service, and that's a bellwether. But there's a whole lot more in Medicaid and Medicare managed care. The nongovernmental payers are all moving in this direction. We all assume fee-for-service will be greatly diminished.

    Large national employers can be real influences in their respective marketplaces. And you see states trying to limit their exposure as well. It could be a global budget approach with a targeted rate of increase, as in Maryland and Massachusetts. In Maryland, 10 rural institutions have adopted the value approach of less utilization, more community-based services, and less reliance on inpatient care because they only get a fixed amount of money. They are out in the community collaborating with social service providers. I see them embracing it and it's terrific.

    The future will be in reserving acute care for when it's absolutely necessary but trying to reach the community through less intensive, less expensive forms of intervention. But everybody's question is, how do you make it work financially?

    MH: Will there be a backlash against narrow networks as in the 1990s?

    Umbdenstock: The jury is out as to how well that works on the access and customer satisfaction side. We've been through one cycle of this on the exchange level, and you're starting to see some tinkering with those networks. On the provider side, you're seeing people say, how do I become one of those preferred providers? So there's movement in the market. The good news is we see positive patient response and performance indicators from provider-sponsored plans. We actually have rating systems and measures this time. We didn't have those in the 1990s. There's a level of accountability and transparency that wasn't there back then, and that gives me hope.

    MH: With population health, how will the role of physicians change?

    Umbdenstock: Physicians will probably play either more of a consultative role within a larger team, or their services will be reserved for issues of clinical ambiguity that no other team member is as qualified to address. They may be seeing fewer patients who are more appropriate to their capabilities and specialties. That would be more rewarding. Would they have as much contact with as many patients? Maybe not. Would they have more time for the truly serious conditions when the patient needs that clinical support and the reassurance that they're getting the highest level of expertise? There will be different practice models, and I think much of it is for the good.

    MH: Is having networks compete with each other, such as in Pittsburgh, a long-term positive for the healthcare system?

    Umbdenstock: Historically, my member hospitals have competed based on array of services and level of technology, and now they're competing more on cost, patient satisfaction and quality outcomes. In that sense, it's healthy for us. But we're starting to figure out where competition should and shouldn't occur. Patient quality and safety should not be a competitive issue. When we figure out what works, or when we have information in one system that is necessary to treat a patient who is being treated elsewhere, we need to be able to share those successes and move that information. Competing on price and patient satisfaction is fine, have at it. But on quality and safety, if the American Hospital Association could find out what works in one institution, we want to spread it to all others because every institution should be the safest place possible for patients.

    MH: Is there a mixed signal from Washington on consolidation and antitrust enforcement?

    Umbdenstock: They are not forcing people back to square one, tearing things up, denying opportunities. But it does keep lots of lawyers, consultants, executives and boards busy all the time. Our members are moving within that reality. What I'd like to see is some acknowledgment that the entities in the system have to be connected more closely to get to the type of coordinated care we all want to see. We have to be able to figure out how these entities can work together legally without wasting a lot of time and money looking over their shoulder. I'd like the government to think about a more appropriate setting going forward.

    MH: What would you like to see happen on the Medicare rule requiring a three-day inpatient stay before patients qualify for coverage of rehab care?

    Umbdenstock: We'd certainly like to see that sort of threshold lessened if not eliminated. But that's going to depend on the type of payment system, incentives and accountability mechanisms in place. The reality at the moment is that if you try to eliminate the three-day rule, it would increase Medicare spending. How are you going to find savings elsewhere? If you want to bundle post-acute care and give the providers a fixed amount of money to take care of their post-inpatient needs, then fine, we'll take that. Now, how do we manage it? Can we move the patient to the most appropriate level without having to worry about these particular hurdles?

    MH: What's the outlook for reforming Medicare physician payment?

    Umbdenstock:I don't think the political calculus has changed, which is that fixes need to be paid for. We are certainly making our view clear that taking the money from one provider entity to pay for a fix in another area is not real reform and doesn't make sense. We think that the physician payment system should be fixed in and of itself. But we're not happy being the target of cuts on a repeated basis.

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    Cleveland-clinic-for web_i.jpg
    Increase in hospital police forces brings criticisms, warnings
    home-infusion
    Rise in home infusion therapy leads to questions on safety, cost
    Most Popular
    1
    More healthcare organizations at risk of credit default, Moody's says
    2
    Centene fills out senior executive team with new president, COO
    3
    SCAN, CareOregon plan to merge into the HealthRight Group
    4
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan unveils big push that lets physicians take on risk, reap rewards
    5
    Bright Health weighs reverse stock split as delisting looms
    Sponsored Content
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Data Center
      • Data Center Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing