Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • ESG: THE NEW IMPERATIVE
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • COVID-19
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Transformation
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Digital Health
  • Insights
    • ACA 10 Years After
    • Best Practices
    • Special Reports
    • Innovations
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top 25 Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Supply Chain
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • Data Center
    • Data Center Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • MORE +
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Newsletters
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Providers
August 04, 2014 01:00 AM

Not all 30-day readmissions indicate problems, study says

Sabriya Rice
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    Are all 30-day readmissions really a bad thing? Not necessarily, according to researchers comparing readmission rates among California hospitals. The study found safety net hospitals in the state often had better outcomes on 30-day mortality measures, but were still more likely to face readmission penalties.

    The research adds to a growing body of data delving into the penalties' effect on hospitals in economically disadvantaged communities.

    When compared to other hospitals, patients treated for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure and pneumonia at California safety net hospitals had lower 30-day risk-adjusted mortality rates, but the hospitals still were more likely to be fined under the value-based purchasing program and the hospital readmissions reduction program, found the study published in the August issue of the journal Health Affairs.

    The main finding is consistent with several other recent studies looking at how hospitals in low-income communities may be disproportionally affected by readmissions penalties.

    The general assumption that readmissions are inherently bad could be part of the issue, explained lead author Edmund Becker, a health policy professor at Emory University's Rollins School of Public Health.

    A readmission could represent a high-quality outcome, especially among patients with advanced or difficult to treat stages of a disease, because it means the patient survived long enough to be readmitted, Becker suggested. Or a readmission could be representative of a low-quality outcome, because the readmission was due to a lower standard of care. It also potentially could be linked to other factors, such as the patient's lack of access to a primary-care physician, the study authors suggest.

    “Predicting readmissions is notoriously difficult,” they write. More research is needed to understand if simply allowing the additional readmission to occur might lead to less-costly overall care, they said.

    A safety-net hospital was defined in the study as those whose percentage of Medicare disproportionate-share patients fell within the highest quartile, which the authors say indicates the hospital cared for more low-income patients relative to other hospitals in the same geographic region.

    Of the 242 hospitals analyzed, 60 were defined as safety net. To make the comparison, researchers used data from the 2013 Medicare Impact File; a CMS list of hospitals that received Medicare payments in March 2013; Hospital Compare data from 2011; the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development; and data on hospital referral regions from the Dartmouth Institute.

    See Related ContentReform Update: PCORI under fire as it prepares to accept new proposals

    Using big data to target preventable readmissions

    NQF to study socio-demographic factorsSafety net hospitals face socio-economic disadvantages

    The fairness of readmission penalties has been a topic of increased interest as hospitals now have Medicare reimbursements docked up to 2% for excess readmissions. That penalty rises to 3% in fiscal 2015. America's Essential Hospitals, a national association that advocates for the nation's safety net hospitals and health systems, links to more than 20 other recent studies looking at the impact of socio-economic factors on health outcomes. These types of studies are catching the attention of policymakers.

    In June, a group of six U.S. senators introduced legislation called the Hospital Readmissions Program Accuracy and Accountability Act, which aims to address what the senators called the “unfair penalization and stigmatization of hospitals serving low-income populations.” Last week, the National Quality Forum announced it plans to conduct a trial examining the effects of various socio-economic factors factors on risk-adjustments. Thirty-day readmission measures may potentially be included as a component of the trial, though NQF says specific details have not been established.

    The current study, conducted by researchers from Emory University in Atlanta; Brown University in Providence, R.I. and Stanford University School of Medicine in Palo Alto, Calif., was funded by one of the first pilot grants issued through the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute. The not-for-profit organization was established through the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act to support comparative-effectiveness research.

    Becker says the current report is a subset of a larger project. The researchers plan to look at similar data in 13 other states, and will also investigate how the size of the penalties affect hospitals' abilities to improve patient outcomes.

    Follow Sabriya Rice on Twitter: @MHsrice

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    rural-health1.png
    Transgender patients in rural states struggle to find doctors
    The Check Up: John Nickens, LCMC Health
    The Check Up: John Nickens, LCMC Health
    Most Popular
    1
    More healthcare organizations at risk of credit default, Moody's says
    2
    Centene fills out senior executive team with new president, COO
    3
    SCAN, CareOregon plan to merge into the HealthRight Group
    4
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan unveils big push that lets physicians take on risk, reap rewards
    5
    Bright Health weighs reverse stock split as delisting looms
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare A.M. Newsletter: Sign up to receive a comprehensive weekday morning newsletter designed for busy healthcare executives who need the latest and most important healthcare news and analysis.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • COVID-19
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Digital Health
    • Insights
      • ACA 10 Years After
      • Best Practices
      • Special Reports
      • Innovations
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top 25 Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Supply Chain
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Data Center
      • Data Center Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • MORE +
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Newsletters
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing