Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • Data Center
    • Data Center Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Insurance
July 01, 2014 01:00 AM

Most HealthCare.gov application discrepancies unresolved: HHS

Paul Demko
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    The federal government was unable to resolve 90% of the 2.9 million inconsistencies discovered on insurance applications submitted through the federal exchange, according to a report (PDF) issued Tuesday by HHS' Office of the Inspector General. Roughly three-quarters of those inconsistencies dealt with either income or immigration status.

    The 14 state-run exchanges and the District of Columbia's exchange appear to have had slightly more success in resolving inconsistencies found on insurance applications. Half of those exchanges reported no problems in resolving data discrepancies, while three others indicated that any inconsistencies were dealt with by their state Medicaid office. However, four states reported that they were unable to rectify discrepancies on exchange applications. And only 11 of the 15 state-run exchanges provided actual data detailing inconsistencies to the OIG investigator.

    The OIG report stressed, however, that applications flagged for discrepancies don't necessarily mean that the associated individuals are receiving benefits that they aren't entitled to.

    That didn't stop Republicans from pouncing on the report as the latest evidence that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act is failing to meet expectations. "Vital portions of the exchanges still sit incomplete, generating serious questions about the system's ability to process inconsistencies or handle next year's open enrollment period," said Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, in a statement. "The reports underscore the perils of the administration's incompetence, the reckless rollout and the systemic disregard for taxpayer dollars."

    Applications are typically flagged when the information provided by an applicant doesn't match what's contained in the federal data hub, which includes records from the Internal Revenue Service, the Social Security Administration and the Department of Homeland Security, among other agencies.

    It's uncertain how many federal exchange applications contained multiple errors and therefore how many of the more than 5.4 million enrollments in private health plans through HealthCare.gov are affected. The state-run exchanges enrolled an additional 2.6 million individuals in private coverage during the open enrollment period that closed at the end of March.

    The OIG analysis only covered enrollments during the first three months of exchange operations, a time when the federal marketplace and many of its state counterparts were beset by technological problems.

    In a statement responding to the report, HHS stressed that vast progress has been made in resolving those issues and that individuals with imperfect applications have been contacted multiple times to resolve the issues.

    "CMS is working expeditiously to resolve inconsistencies to make sure individuals and families get the tax credits and coverage they deserve and that no one receives a benefit they shouldn't," the statement said. "We are actively reaching out to consumers to provide additional information that supports their application for coverage and verifying their information every day."

    The discrepancies for income and immigration status are potentially troubling because they are crucial in determining eligibility for plans offered through the exchanges. Federal subsidies are determined by income, with individuals making up to 400% of the federal poverty threshold eligible for assistance. Immigrants who lack proper immigration documents are not eligible to obtain any coverage through the state and federal marketplaces.

    "To date there has been no evidence of an applicant defrauding the (federal marketplace) or a state-based marketplace in order to unlawfully enroll in a (health plan) through the marketplace or take advantage of an insurance affordability program for which the applicant is not eligible," the report noted.

    The four states that were unable to resolve inconsistencies—Massachusetts, Nevada, Oregon, and Vermont—blamed their problems on failures in their information technology systems that led to manual data entry. Among the states that reported specific data on discrepancies, there were vast differences in the percentage of flagged applications. In Massachusetts, 98% of the state's roughly 7,000 applications were found to have problems, according to the OIG report. By contrast, just 6% of Maryland's roughly 18,000 applications were deemed problematic.

    The OIG report recommended that HHS come up with a detailed plan for reconciling discrepancies found in applications submitted through the federal exchange and a means for tracking its progress. In addition, it recommended that the federal agency heighten its scrutiny of state-run exchanges to make sure they are dealing with problematic applications in a timely manner. HHS indicated in its response to the report that it would follow through on both recommendations.

    Follow Paul Demko on Twitter: @MHpdemko

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    diversity2_i.png
    How Connecticut's Broker Academy targets health disparities
    cybersecurity_i.jpg
    Massachusetts health insurer faces ransomware attack, member data at risk
    Most Popular
    1
    More healthcare organizations at risk of credit default, Moody's says
    2
    Centene fills out senior executive team with new president, COO
    3
    SCAN, CareOregon plan to merge into the HealthRight Group
    4
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan unveils big push that lets physicians take on risk, reap rewards
    5
    Bright Health weighs reverse stock split as delisting looms
    Sponsored Content
    Daily Finance Newsletter: Sign up to receive daily news and data that has a direct impact on the business and financing of healthcare.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Data Center
      • Data Center Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing