Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • Data Center
    • Data Center Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Providers
May 17, 2014 01:00 AM

Clashing visions on medical care practice prove to be hurdle

Merrill Goozner, Editor
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Goozner

    Clashing visions of how physicians should practice medicine in the 21st century bubble beneath the surface of nearly every controversial issue in delivery system reform.

    On the one side is what Press Ganey chief medical officer Dr. Thomas H. Lee in a recent essay in JAMA Internal Medicine called a “last-century perspective. It reflects a time when patient outcomes were considered unmeasurable and when the idea of team care meant everyone following the orders of whichever physician was in charge.”

    This approach put heroic practitioners at the center of the diagnosis, treatment and healing process. It posited that the best therapy for any patient should be discerned and delivered by someone with years of training and experience and, hopefully, a personal relationship with the individual in need of care.

    In a practice environment where knowledge and technology evolved slowly and medical evidence in the form of clinical trials and outcomes data was scant, that approach offered comfort to physicians and patients alike. If things turned out poorly, both the healer and the family at least came away thinking they had tried their best.

    However, the rapidly evolving protocols of population health medicine and coordinated care challenge that century-old model. They do so both on the medical science and on methods of practice.

    Today, much more is known about what works in medicine, how well it works, and how well it compares to alternative approaches, both in terms of outcomes and costs. This advancing medical knowledge presents practitioners with the choice of making judgments based on their own experiences or following scientifically derived clinical practice guidelines and protocols.

    Most physicians, even those who are most vociferous in their complaints about “cookbook” medicine, say they adhere to the science in all but the exceptional cases. But do they really?

    Medical science remains a sphere where technology developers can make claims based on minimal or poorly designed trials about their latest drug, heart implant or radiation delivery system. Most providers—and this includes hospitals as well as physicians—still operate under the misaligned incentives of fee-for-service medicine. The opportunity for pseudo-knowledge and self-interest to cloud judgment is ever-present.

    There also is a growing recognition that many medical technologies, even when approved by regulators and incorporated into guidelines, have trade-offs that may reduce or even eliminate their medical value. A cancer-screening test may turn up some early tumors. But if it simultaneously generates numerous false positives that lead to unnecessary treatments with their own downsides, the effort to catch disease early may in fact wind up causing more harm than it prevents.

    Patient preferences and growing financial responsibilities also play a greater role in determining the medical decisions made by physicians and hospitals. Given the option, most patients will choose watchful waiting or palliation to treatments that have serious side effects or offer little likelihood of a long-term cure.

    No matter what technology gets chosen, physicians and hospitals practicing 21st century medicine will have to confront process issues as they strive to achieve the higher overall quality that leads to better outcomes. There's no question that adhering to well-defined surgical procedures or immediately administering an aspirin to heart attack patients will reduce unnecessary complications and mortality. The issue is how to achieve 100% compliance with proven standards like those.

    The old model is stood on its head here, too. To achieve superior performance, the once-unquestionable physician leader must give way to the team. She must adhere to standard protocols for procedures and administer therapeutic approaches that the scientific evidence—which may come just as often from registries and outcomes databases as from clinical trials—suggests will lead to the best outcomes for the greatest number.

    In this brave new world, variation in care is the enemy of quality—not the wise choice of an experienced clinician. Standardization is the surest path to achieving the best outcomes. It is analogous to the wise investor picking an index fund over the stock-picking money manager who once had a good year.

    In his essay, Lee pushed back against those who argue that “improving value” is just the latest code word for rationing care. Stinting on care “in ways that hurt outcomes is not improving value,” he wrote. “Improving outcomes without raising costs is improving value. So is reducing costs without compromising outcomes.”

    The biggest hurdle on the road to increasing the value of what Americans spend on healthcare is ensuring that clinicians, provider organizations, payers and the public understand the difference.

    Follow Merrill Goozner on Twitter: @MHgoozner

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    finance graphs hospital
    Primary care physicians' pay growth picked up in 2022: MGMA
    Home cancer treatment faces challenges post-pandemic
    Home cancer treatment faces challenges post-pandemic
    Most Popular
    1
    More healthcare organizations at risk of credit default, Moody's says
    2
    Centene fills out senior executive team with new president, COO
    3
    SCAN, CareOregon plan to merge into the HealthRight Group
    4
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan unveils big push that lets physicians take on risk, reap rewards
    5
    Bright Health weighs reverse stock split as delisting looms
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare A.M. Newsletter: Sign up to receive a comprehensive weekday morning newsletter designed for busy healthcare executives who need the latest and most important healthcare news and analysis.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Data Center
      • Data Center Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing