Skip to main content
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Digital Health
    • Transformation
    • ESG
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Blogs
    • AI
    • Deals
    • Layoff Tracker
    • HIMSS 2023
  • Opinion
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • 40 Under 40
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - AI and Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
  • Data & Insights
    • Data & Insights Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • Newsletters
  • MORE+
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Providers
April 12, 2014 12:00 AM

A promising start

Merrill Goozner, Editor
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print
    Goozner

    Medicare's long-anticipated release of individual physician payments revealed there is huge potential in public use of this newly available data source—although not in the ways most observers expected.

    Physician groups led by the American Medical Association fought release of the data for decades. They claimed unveiling what for one year turned out to be 9 million payments involving 880,000 physicians and practices totaling $77 billion would violate providers' privacy and be widely misinterpreted.

    Those fears proved unfounded. Most media stories on the first or second day after the massive data dump prominently noted that reports for single providers might actually cover dozens or even hundreds of physicians. They also reported the Medicare payments had to cover office overhead, staff salaries, equipment and drugs and supplies. Payment dollars didn't translate into physician salaries or practice earnings.

    Those caveats didn't stop two national media outlets—the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal—from immediately posting the data with a user-friendly interface on their websites. It enabled anyone desiring to look up their own physicians—or one they want to know more about or compare—to discover how many patients that doctor saw with the same condition, how many times they performed the procedure, how much they billed the CMS and how much they got paid.

    How useful is that information? From a consumer or patient perspective, it would be nice to know how many times your doctor has performed a particular procedure. Experience matters.

    But beyond that, the data aren't very useful for patients. Medicare is only one slice of a physician's practice. Billing and payment data reveal nothing about outcomes, adverse events or how much an individual would have to pay out of pocket. It is not likely that many seniors will avail themselves of these new transparency tools.

    On the other hand, one can imagine private insurers sifting the information to see how their rates compare with Medicare rates. Investigators for public and private payers also will be looking for individual and geographic hot spots that might signal overutilization and fraud.

    The CMS reported there were nearly 40,000 data downloads last week. It's doubtful many were seniors. One has to assume that sophisticated analysis of the database is already underway.

    So what can we expect as these professional users delve into the data? Even the first rough cuts at analysis by the media revealed how transparency of physician claims data could one day contribute to the nationwide effort to eliminate unnecessary costs.

    One example will suffice. As Modern Healthcare and other news outlets reported, ophthalmologists represented the professional group receiving the most payments other than general internists. As representatives for that specialty quickly noted, their fees were inflated by payments for an expensive drug used in the treatment of macular degeneration, a common eye malady among seniors.

    Lucentis (ranibizumab), developed and manufactured by Genentech, a unit of Roche, costs about $2,000 per monthly treatment. The anti-angiogenesis drug—it stops vision-impairing capillary formation when injected in minute amounts into the eye—is a true miracle of modern medicine. But as a study financed by the National Eye Institute and published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2011 noted, there's an equally effective alternative called Avastin (bevacizumab), which is available from the same company at one-fortieth of the price.

    Indeed, Avastin is essentially the same drug and it does exactly the same thing as Lucentis. The only difference is that it is sold in large vials for treating cancer. Some ophthalmologists had been using it for years before Genetech developed the pricier Lucentis, which is specifically labeled for macular degeneration.

    Ophthalmologists' incentives are easily explained. They prefer using the more expensive drug because Congress established a reimbursement scheme for Part B drugs administered in physician offices that includes a 6% markup to pay for the ancillary costs of running an office. Six percent of $2,000 beats 6% of $50 every time.

    One can imagine the data revealing dozens of similar scenarios where physicians opted for pricier products or services over equally effective but cheaper alternatives. As researchers and investigators uncover those patterns, it will escalate pressure on Congress to come up with more cost-effective reimbursement mechanisms—ones that reward value, not volume or markups.

    Follow Merrill Goozner on Twitter: @MHgoozner

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    diversity
    Health equity execs leveraging academic roles to drive long-term change
    Patrick Blair InnovAge
    PACE could expand amid possible nursing home closures: InnovAge CEO
    Most Popular
    1
    Centene to lay off 2,000 workers
    2
    How health systems are battling price-gouging allegations
    3
    Senate advances bill to temporarily aid hospitals, health centers
    4
    Elevance, Blue Cross Louisiana halt $2.5B proposed deal
    5
    Tower Health to sell urgent care centers, close others
    Sponsored Content
    Modern Healthcare A.M. Newsletter: Sign up to receive a comprehensive weekday morning newsletter designed for busy healthcare executives who need the latest and most important healthcare news and analysis.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Help Center
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Digital Health
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • ESG
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Blogs
      • AI
      • Deals
      • Layoff Tracker
      • HIMSS 2023
    • Opinion
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • 40 Under 40
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • ESG: The Implementation Imperative Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - AI and Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
      • Sponsored Video Series - Checking In with Dan Peres
    • Data & Insights
      • Data & Insights Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • Newsletters
    • MORE+
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing