Skip to main content
Sister Publication Links
  • ESG: THE NEW IMPERATIVE
Subscribe
  • Sign Up Free
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • News
    • Current News
    • COVID-19
    • Providers
    • Insurance
    • Government
    • Finance
    • Technology
    • Safety & Quality
    • Transformation
    • People
    • Regional News
    • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Patients
    • Operations
    • Care Delivery
    • Payment
    • Midwest
    • Northeast
    • South
    • West
  • Digital Health
  • Insights
    • ACA 10 Years After
    • Best Practices
    • Special Reports
    • Innovations
  • Opinion
    • Bold Moves
    • Breaking Bias
    • Commentaries
    • Letters
    • Vital Signs Blog
    • From the Editor
  • Events & Awards
    • Awards
    • Conferences
    • Galas
    • Virtual Briefings
    • Webinars
    • Nominate/Eligibility
    • 100 Most Influential People
    • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
    • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
    • Excellence in Governance
    • Health Care Hall of Fame
    • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
    • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
    • Top 25 Innovators
    • Diversity in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
      • - Leaders to Watch
    • Women in Healthcare
      • - Luminaries
      • - Top 25 Women Leaders
      • - Women to Watch
    • Digital Health Transformation Summit
    • Leadership Symposium
    • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
    • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
    • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
    • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
    • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
    • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
    • - Hospital of the Future
    • - Value Based Care
    • - Supply Chain
    • - Hospital at Home
    • - Workplace of the Future
    • - Digital Health
    • - Future of Staffing
    • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
  • Multimedia
    • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
    • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
    • Video Series - The Check Up
    • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
  • Data Center
    • Data Center Home
    • Hospital Financials
    • Staffing & Compensation
    • Quality & Safety
    • Mergers & Acquisitions
    • Data Archive
    • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
    • Surveys
    • Data Points
  • MORE +
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise
    • Media Kit
    • Newsletters
    • Jobs
    • People on the Move
    • Reprints & Licensing
MENU
Breadcrumb
  1. Home
  2. Insurance
May 04, 2013 01:00 AM

Narrow negotiations

Hospitals fear disruptions from limited networks

Rich Daly
  • Tweet
  • Share
  • Share
  • Email
  • More
    Reprints Print

    Large safety net hospitals and academic medical centers fear they will be cut out of the picture by the narrow networks on steroids that many insurers will offer in the new insurance marketplaces that open for business Oct. 1.

    Narrow networks—where a limited set of providers are fully covered by an insurance plan—have emerged as a common theme in recent negotiations between hospitals and insurers, participants say. The restricted networks are likely to exclude public and academic medical centers because of their generally higher rates, which those hospitals say are due to their treating more seriously ill patients.

    Truman Medical Centers, a safety net hospital in Kansas City, Mo., has seen the emphasis on provider networks in its discussions with insurers planning to submit plans for the federally run Missouri health insurance exchange, according to Gerard Grimaldi, the hospital's vice president for government relations. Although Truman expects inclusion in some exchange plans, the outlook may be worse for other facilities.

    “I can easily see how a similar institution like Truman Medical Centers and the patients who rely on them in another marketplace could see disruptions in their provider-patient relationships” due to narrow networks, Grimaldi said.

    Patients locked into narrow networks could see prohibitively higher co-pays and deductibles when they seek care outside of the networks, which is typical of most managed-care plans. Their use in exchange-offered plans is expected to accelerate, though, because regulations in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act limit insurers' ability to restrict services, increase enrollees' cost sharing or spread costs to people with pre-existing conditions or the near-old, health policy analysts say.

    The use of a limited group of providers with whom insurers have negotiated reduced rates is among the few ways plans have to lower their costs. The law's exchange rules “make it in the interest of health plans to keep their networks tight,” said Ellen Pryga, director of policy for the American Hospital Association.

    Commercial insurers and for-profit hospitals have indicated in investor calls in recent months that they are negotiating narrow network arrangements for plans that will be offered on the new exchanges.

    While the exchange network adequacy rules include a provision that essential community providers (ECPs) be included in any plan with a limited network, officials at large public safety net hospitals are worried those safeguards may have been undermined by recent guidance issued by the Center for Consumer Information and Insurance Oversight at the CMS. On April 5, the office wrote insurers considering plans for the 33 federally operated exchanges that they could meet the ECP requirement by adding a single hospital of any type to their networks.

    “There are a lot of hospitals that qualify under the federal definition of ECP, and not all of them are true safety net hospitals,” said Xiaoyi Huang, assistant vice president for policy at the National Association of Public Hospitals and Health Systems. Huang's group is writing the CMS about its concerns, but the use of guidance instead of a formal rule means the CMS is not required to respond.

    Although the full impact of large-scale use of tight provider networks in exchange plans may not be known for several years, public hospitals and academic medical centers are concerned it could reduce their number of insured patients, raise uncompensated care costs and boost their bad debt. Patients in narrow network plans who seek care at out-of-network safety net hospitals will be more likely to fail to pay the high patient copays that federal rules allow in such cases.

    That leaves the hospitals to absorb those costs. “There's not going to be out-of-network coverage except for very limited services,” said Sara Rosenbaum, a professor of health policy at George Washington University.

    Such uncompensated care costs have traditionally been offset by federal and state assistance for hospitals with high numbers of uninsured patients—so-called disproportionate share payments. But governments at all levels are planning to cut back on such assistance due to the expanded coverage provided by the federal healthcare overhaul.

    Meanwhile, hospitals that have aggressively expanded to develop their own networks of providers and can offer insurers a one-stop narrow network are likely to be big winners from the narrow network plans. They are expected to gain wide acceptance in exchange plans.

    “They stand a better chance because what the plan wants to do is buy a specialty package in a box,” Rosenbaum said. “It's cheaper and you only have to shop once.”

    Follow Rich Daly on Twitter: @MHrdaly

    Letter
    to the
    Editor

    Send us a letter

    Have an opinion about this story? Click here to submit a Letter to the Editor, and we may publish it in print.

    Recommended for You
    medicare-advantage-CMS-audits
    More MA insurer audits mean more scrutiny on providers
    medicare advantage directories
    Provider directories are a mess. CMS' plan to fix them has few fans
    Most Popular
    1
    More healthcare organizations at risk of credit default, Moody's says
    2
    Centene fills out senior executive team with new president, COO
    3
    SCAN, CareOregon plan to merge into the HealthRight Group
    4
    Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan unveils big push that lets physicians take on risk, reap rewards
    5
    Bright Health weighs reverse stock split as delisting looms
    Sponsored Content
    Daily Finance Newsletter: Sign up to receive daily news and data that has a direct impact on the business and financing of healthcare.
    Get Newsletters

    Sign up for enewsletters and alerts to receive breaking news and in-depth coverage of healthcare events and trends, as they happen, right to your inbox.

    Subscribe Today
    MH Magazine Cover

    MH magazine offers content that sheds light on healthcare leaders’ complex choices and touch points—from strategy, governance, leadership development and finance to operations, clinical care, and marketing.

    Subscribe
    Connect with Us
    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • Facebook
    • RSS

    Our Mission

    Modern Healthcare empowers industry leaders to succeed by providing unbiased reporting of the news, insights, analysis and data.

    Contact Us

    (877) 812-1581

    Email us

     

    Resources
    • Contact Us
    • Advertise with Us
    • Ad Choices Ad Choices
    • Sitemap
    Editorial Dept
    • Submission Guidelines
    • Code of Ethics
    • Awards
    • About Us
    Legal
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Privacy Request
    Modern Healthcare
    Copyright © 1996-2023. Crain Communications, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
    • News
      • Current News
      • COVID-19
      • Providers
      • Insurance
      • Government
      • Finance
      • Technology
      • Safety & Quality
      • Transformation
        • Patients
        • Operations
        • Care Delivery
        • Payment
      • People
      • Regional News
        • Midwest
        • Northeast
        • South
        • West
      • Digital Edition (Web Version)
    • Digital Health
    • Insights
      • ACA 10 Years After
      • Best Practices
      • Special Reports
      • Innovations
    • Opinion
      • Bold Moves
      • Breaking Bias
      • Commentaries
      • Letters
      • Vital Signs Blog
      • From the Editor
    • Events & Awards
      • Awards
        • Nominate/Eligibility
        • 100 Most Influential People
        • 50 Most Influential Clinical Executives
        • Best Places to Work in Healthcare
        • Excellence in Governance
        • Health Care Hall of Fame
        • Healthcare Marketing Impact Awards
        • Top 25 Emerging Leaders
        • Top 25 Innovators
        • Diversity in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Diversity Leaders
          • - Leaders to Watch
        • Women in Healthcare
          • - Luminaries
          • - Top 25 Women Leaders
          • - Women to Watch
      • Conferences
        • Digital Health Transformation Summit
        • Leadership Symposium
        • Social Determinants of Health Symposium
        • Women Leaders in Healthcare Conference
      • Galas
        • Best Places to Work Awards Gala
        • Health Care Hall of Fame Gala
        • Top 25 Diversity Leaders Gala
        • Top 25 Women Leaders Gala
      • Virtual Briefings
        • - Hospital of the Future
        • - Value Based Care
        • - Supply Chain
        • - Hospital at Home
        • - Workplace of the Future
        • - Digital Health
        • - Future of Staffing
        • - Hospital of the Future (Fall)
      • Webinars
    • Multimedia
      • Podcast - Beyond the Byline
      • Sponsored Podcast - Healthcare Insider
      • Video Series - The Check Up
      • Sponsored Video Series - One on One
    • Data Center
      • Data Center Home
      • Hospital Financials
      • Staffing & Compensation
      • Quality & Safety
      • Mergers & Acquisitions
      • Data Archive
      • Resource Guide: By the Numbers
      • Surveys
      • Data Points
    • MORE +
      • Contact Us
      • Advertise
      • Media Kit
      • Newsletters
      • Jobs
      • People on the Move
      • Reprints & Licensing