Both sides said the proposal still needs refining after coming together the day before the House Health and Human Services Policy Committee met.
Minnesota Hospital Association's president, Lawrence Massa, said the group that represents 144 hospitals is "on board in concept" with the arrangement.
"Nobody is being asked to change anything. Just report what you're doing," he said.
Nurses Association executive director Walt Frederickson said his union still regards hospital staffing as strained and causing unnecessary patient risk. He said increasing hospital transparency is a big step.
"The members will be happy with being able to gather this data. Right now this data has been non-existent to us and the public," Frederickson said. "It's the consumers of health care that really benefit from this."
Other states have similar reporting systems; only California has a mandatory staffing law that the Minnesota union had been seeking. Past efforts to attain minimum staffing requirements through collective bargaining have fallen short, which led the union to Minnesota's Capitol.
The issue rose to the level where House Speaker Paul Thissen personally worked to broker the compromise in a Thursday afternoon meeting with stakeholders. The legislation had caused consternation within the House Democratic caucus between those members partial to the union's arguments and those representing districts where a local hospital is a major employer. Democratic Gov. Mark Dayton had expressed some hesitation with the earlier version.
Rep. Tina Liebling, the committee's chairwoman, also had been cool to the original proposal. She said the changes to the bill help defuse a contentious topic.
"There's broad agreement we need to do something in this area," said Liebling, DFL-Rochester. "There is a problem. We need to do some study of the problem."
The bill still has a ways to go before becoming law, and the Senate has yet to start its consideration of the nursing proposal. The first Senate hearing on the nursing issue is Monday.